Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

October 21, 2025, 01:18:14 am

Author Topic: How to write a 20/20 Section B Creating and Presenting Context Piece  (Read 57075 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

akeergar

  • Victorian
  • Trailblazer
  • *
  • Posts: 42
  • Respect: 0
  • School: The Grange P-12 College
Re: How to write a 20/20 Section B Creating and Presenting Context Piece
« Reply #45 on: September 05, 2013, 06:21:56 pm »
0
Hey,

I'm just curious, and I hope you don't mind me asking, but what were your SAC scores like for you to obtain a 48 in English?
Hopeful Atar score: 98

Arts/Law Monash University.

VivaTequila

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1136
  • Respect: +131
Re: How to write a 20/20 Section B Creating and Presenting Context Piece
« Reply #46 on: September 06, 2013, 07:27:54 pm »
0
I averaged a 91% across my SACs

Alwin

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 838
  • Respect: +241
Re: How to write a 20/20 Section B Creating and Presenting Context Piece
« Reply #47 on: September 17, 2013, 11:30:51 pm »
0
This is probably a very stupid question, but why is writing a pure imaginative piece (no hybrid stuff) such a big risk?

I always feel inclined to write creatively whether it be a short story / scene from a play / etc. I can write persuasively effectively if required, but it's not my preferred style for C&P responses - takes a bit longer to get it going.


Do you guys think I should continue with creative, or practise persuasive more?

Probably should add I get ~9s for either style... it's just this "risk" of creative pieces that worries me... =\
2012:  Methods [48] Physics [49]
2013:  English [40] (oops) Chemistry [46] Spesh [42] Indo SL [34] Uni Maths: Melb UMEP [4.5] Monash MUEP [just for a bit of fun]
2014:  BAeroEng/BComm

A pessimist says a glass is half empty, an optimist says a glass is half full.
An engineer says the glass has a safety factor of 2.0

VivaTequila

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1136
  • Respect: +131
Re: How to write a 20/20 Section B Creating and Presenting Context Piece
« Reply #48 on: September 18, 2013, 12:26:08 am »
+1
This is probably a very stupid question, but why is writing a pure imaginative piece (no hybrid stuff) such a big risk?

I always feel inclined to write creatively whether it be a short story / scene from a play / etc. I can write persuasively effectively if required, but it's not my preferred style for C&P responses - takes a bit longer to get it going.


Do you guys think I should continue with creative, or practise persuasive more?

Probably should add I get ~9s for either style... it's just this "risk" of creative pieces that worries me... =\

This is the exact sort of question I like because I feel like I can give real insight here.

So to sum up your case
- I believe you think writing creatively comes naturally, but you also have the skills/competency to write persuasively and that you'll still get great marks if you write persuasively.

- You think writing creatively is easier because you think you can assess all the criteria (firstly relating your imaginative piece to the characters and events in the book, then relating those to the prompt, and finally making sure that the ideas are appropriate for your context) by just creating something that links them all together. Fabricating a story. Writing an article. Being creative - just make it up and it works, right?

- In other words, you write something like a story that has characters like the books characters or people in similar positions to characters in the story, they encounter a situation which is related to the events in the book, and they have to confront ideas aroused in their context that are also relevant to the prompt

- Your conundrum is that you are unsure of whether or not to go creatively (you are wondering what the dangers of such an approach are, if any), and you are erring on the side of safety - safety in the sense that you can virtually guarantee yourself a high mark writing persuasively, just because it's methodical and you can deal with that no problems.

So my advice, in short, is that creative has a bigger potential to go wrong but you can totally deal with that if you want to write creatively come exam time, and with no doubt get a high mark if you practice skills that will guarantee you marks on the exam in this study period. However, you are less likely to screw up writing persuasively - there's not much to be left to the imagination, and they are entirely methodical and so therefore easy to work through under the pressures of an exam situation. You could guarantee yourself an 8/10, but how would you be feeling after it? You could also totally blitz a creative piece if you know how to do it and feel confident about the rest of your exam knowing you owned a complex prompt.

But to elaborate on a couple of points I think are important...

If you are going to do this, pick which one you want now based on your own predilections in conjunction with advice you get here from AN members. The earlier you pick, the more you capitalise on your finite revision and preparation time. Don't waste time on the activities that aren't going to help you come exam time, unless you have a good reason for it.

Make sure that if you decide to write creatively, you play it smart. You know that there is the real danger of not being able to think creatively on the day, and you will be under pressure of knowing that it all comes down to this essay. You might be able to spin -a- story, but you have to make it as radiant as your other best ones. Only someone very mentally strongwilled can walk confidentally into an exam situation and know with their entirety that if they didn't stress out and thought about the problem before them, they would be able to find a great way through that would impress their examiners. I'm not saying "if you don't have the confidence here back out now". I'm saying "if you are tentative, then prepare until you know you can link any idea together with a wicked story so that the exam will be breezy just like any other practice essay." In other words, practice to the point where you can make up 5 stories in 5 minutes; worry about the framework, the detail can come as you're writing. That's the best possible mentality you can enter an exam situation in. And if you get there, you'll kill it. It's about being positive and confident and knowing that, hey, you actually can do this pretty damn well.

On the topic of playing it smart when writing creatively, make a plan. Realise what the examiners are looking for, and what they award marks to. The assessors need to analyse three major things - how well your story works into the text, the context, and the prompt. They look at the relationships between your story and things in the book (these could be characters, people, places, plot twists, structure formats, alternate media like letters, tv shows, or psychiatric reports that could be relevant to the book that would justify writing in these mediums). They look at the relationship between your story and the context (what are the ideas in your context? how are they represented in the books? what were you supposed to pay attention to in class when they were discussing context for your chosen book on the exam?). What are the relationships between your story and the (highly generic, always easy-to-handle) prompt.

If you figure out a way to connect the main ideas in your book (in other words, learn all of the main ideas in your book. all of them. then you've satisfied this step) and imbue them in your story, you'll be fine.

And then you figure out a way to link that into the ideas that are in your context (you will discuss highly generic ideas in class that are widely applicable and "universal") and imbue them in your story, you'll be fine.

And finally if you figure out a way to link the ideas that are in the prompt to your story, and maybe even give your own special take / interpretation / personal twist of the prompt, you'll be fine.

Practice making stories that you can do that super efficiently in. In other words, learn about the book, the context, and think about the prompt, then just make stuff up.

If you practice this enough and came pre-loaded with the ability to write well, you can guarantee yourself a 10... If you practice.

The other option is just getting bloody brilliant at persuasive writing, and if this is something that doesn't bring you dismay, then by all means master the art of persuasive writing. It is definitely more methodical and easier to work through if you have a writer's brain, and it's a lot harder to get lost for inspiration. You can, also, again, guarantee yourself an 8 or 9 on the exam.

You clearly must be adept with writing if you have some propensity to write creatively - it's a skill not a lot of people have, so if your case is anything like what I imagine it to be as described above, then I would encourage you to go with what feels natural. Because, chances are, you're not too bad at writing creatively and if you revise-smart, then seriously, just chill you're fine bro and you know it lol.

I'm super inebriated right now but you only live once. Let's see what I was thinking when I come back and read this tomorrow.

charmanderp

  • Honorary Moderator
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 3209
  • Respect: +305
  • School Grad Year: 2012
Re: How to write a 20/20 Section B Creating and Presenting Context Piece
« Reply #49 on: September 18, 2013, 12:46:05 am »
+1
I think being able to write an expository essay is a skill everyone can have - it's the most adaptable on exam day, and you can achieve good marks on any prompt with an expository essay if you know the context well enough.
University of Melbourne - Bachelor of Arts majoring in English, Economics and International Studies (2013 onwards)

Alwin

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 838
  • Respect: +241
Re: How to write a 20/20 Section B Creating and Presenting Context Piece
« Reply #50 on: September 18, 2013, 06:45:34 pm »
0
I think being able to write an expository essay is a skill everyone can have - it's the most adaptable on exam day, and you can achieve good marks on any prompt with an expository essay if you know the context well enough.
Yeah, I've been told similar things. The only problem with my expository writing is that I make a bit too many technical errors which brings me down since a lot of C&P marking is (according to my teacher) based on how well you express yourself. My last expository essay I tried came back with the comment: "neologism", which was a bit of a worry :P
Also, I feel like if I go into the exam and write a TR, LA anddd expository CP ill be pretty bummed pretty quickly since they're all kind of similar structured styles...
Thanks for your input tho! :))

This is the exact sort of question I like because I feel like I can give real insight here.
I believe you think writing creatively comes naturally
.....
Your conundrum is that you are unsure of whether or not to go creatively (you are wondering what the dangers of such an approach are, if any), and you are erring on the side of safety - safety in the sense that you can virtually guarantee yourself a high mark writing persuasively, just because it's methodical and you can deal with that no problems.
haha pretty much. my english teacher likes my style or flow... or something like that :P

So my advice, in short, is that creative has a bigger potential to go wrong but you can totally deal with that if you want to write creatively come exam time, and with no doubt get a high mark if you practice skills that will guarantee you marks on the exam in this study period.
Make sure that if you decide to write creatively, you play it smart. You know that there is the real danger of not being able to think creatively on the day, and you will be under pressure of knowing that it all comes down to this essay. You might be able to spin -a- story, but you have to make it as radiant as your other best ones.
.....
In other words, practice to the point where you can make up 5 stories in 5 minutes; worry about the framework, the detail can come as you're writing.
Is that the "only" danger? I heard that another danger would be if the story doesn't "click" with the examiner, do I need to be careful with that too?
I always plan as a write imaginative lol. Otherwise I find if attempt to structure it at the start, it gets clunky or restrictive sometimes, esp towards the end when I'm halfway thro, thought of a great end / twist that doesn't fit with my "original plan" and have to alter everything.

Also how much do you plan for pieces, just out of curiosity? Normally I just write ~3 key dot points and start... I've seen some people do MASSIVE, like page long, plans before they start  =\

The assessors need to analyse three major things - how well your story works into the text, the context, and the prompt. They look at the relationships between your story and things in the book (these could be characters, people, places, plot twists, structure formats, alternate media like
.....
They look at the relationship between your story and the context (what are the ideas in your context? how are they represented in the books? what were you supposed to pay attention to in class when they were discussing context for your chosen book on the exam?). What are the relationships between your story and the (highly generic, always easy-to-handle) prompt. If you figure out a way to connect the main ideas in your book (in other words, learn all of the main ideas in your book. all of them. then you've satisfied this step) and imbue them in your story, you'll be fine. And then you figure out a way to link that into the ideas that are in your context (you will discuss highly generic ideas in class that are widely applicable and "universal") and imbue them in your story, you'll be fine. And finally if you figure out a way to link the ideas that are in the prompt to your story, and maybe even give your own special take / interpretation / personal twist of the prompt, you'll be fine.
Hmm, this actually reminds me of another question (hope you don't mind Viva, but your answers have been awesome so far :))):

Do I spoon feed the examiner or can I use more complex writing?

My context is Whose Reality and we did Spies and Death of a Salesman.
For Spies, I used to write relatively simple, straightforward stories from the point of an unreliable narrator who has a best friend and they encounter a situation, different point of views, someone else's reality imposed on the narrator etc etc basically I can twist the story however which way to suit most prompts (except memory ones, then I use diff style but I digress)
For DoS, in my last sac I tried a more linguistically complex story because its from an older narrator's point of view etc etc, using motifs and symbolism heavily. I haven't gotten this sac back, so don't know how it went down...

So basically is there a "better" story type? Or is it just dependent on how well I can write and link with context, texts, ideas etc


Practice making stories that you can do that super efficiently in. In other words, learn about the book, the context, and think about the prompt, then just make stuff up.
If you practice this enough and come pre-loaded with the ability to write well, you can guarantee yourself a 10... If you practice.
The other option is just getting bloody brilliant at persuasive writing, and if this is something that doesn't bring you dismay, then by all means master the art of persuasive writing. It is definitely more methodical and easier to work through if you have a writer's brain, and it's a lot harder to get lost for inspiration.

I'm super inebriated right now but you only live once. Let's see what I was thinking when I come back and read this tomorrow.
What do you mean by "preloaded"? As in having written short stories before and can 'pull one out of the hat' to suit the prompt, or alter it so?
I like persuasive.. but always seem to imbue it will elements of imagination, like a made up scenario where a passionate speech is required or a debate script etc etc. Don't have that much experience writing articles and whatnot


HAHA it made sense and was great!! Clearly since you didn't go back and change anything, you agree too? :P
THANKS +1
« Last Edit: September 18, 2013, 06:47:26 pm by Alwin »
2012:  Methods [48] Physics [49]
2013:  English [40] (oops) Chemistry [46] Spesh [42] Indo SL [34] Uni Maths: Melb UMEP [4.5] Monash MUEP [just for a bit of fun]
2014:  BAeroEng/BComm

A pessimist says a glass is half empty, an optimist says a glass is half full.
An engineer says the glass has a safety factor of 2.0

akeergar

  • Victorian
  • Trailblazer
  • *
  • Posts: 42
  • Respect: 0
  • School: The Grange P-12 College
Re: How to write a 20/20 Section B Creating and Presenting Context Piece
« Reply #51 on: October 22, 2013, 06:08:29 pm »
0
I legit have no idea but what style i should write in for my context so I thought I would just write as I felt and see how it goes. This is experimental and I appreciate that this isn't a marking and feedback forum so I only wrote my first paragraph (it's not the intro but my first point) just to give you a feel of how I plan to write. Feedback would be great, thanks!

‘Conflict reveals what is wrong and what is right in the world’

Destruction and violence, conflict on the global and universal scale, in the form of wars, terrorism and crimes against humanity undoubtedly expose the fragmentation of our world. In situations such as those occurring currently in Egypt, were political conflict as lead to the genocide of hundreds of people, the evil and destructive nature of the human condition  cannot be hidden. Sitting at home and watching the endless images of dead children, of men, women and the elderly wrapped in white cloths and laid out in rows inside every warehouse, street side and building. Twenty minutes of Aljazeera footage showing the most gut wrenching and sickening displays of human cruelty and chaos.  We want to shut our eyes to it, turn off the television and pretend that what we saw wasn't reality but the disturbing genius of some strange movie. This is the power of such conflicts, the ability for such images of horror to create a hollow feeling in the pit of our stomach, to force is to challenge and question every form of human happiness and worldly pleasures. It is in an unrelenting and completely unforgiving way that such conflicts reveal the complete irrationality, lack of human compassion and reasoning in our world.

(205 words, decent for the exam?)
..............................
I would go on to talk about how our factors such as race, gender, religion ect can lead to moral relativism and thus affect our ability to subjectively distinguish right from wrong in times of conflict. Finally I would talk about how conflict, in some cases, can show us what is right in the world by showing the power of human compassion and strength in times of conflict.
« Last Edit: October 22, 2013, 06:14:50 pm by akeergar »
Hopeful Atar score: 98

Arts/Law Monash University.

zerbe6

  • Victorian
  • Adventurer
  • *
  • Posts: 10
  • Respect: 0
  • School: Luther College
Re: How to write a 20/20 Section B Creating and Presenting Context Piece
« Reply #52 on: October 24, 2013, 11:30:49 pm »
+1
Hi all. I haven't really posted much here but I have decided I am going to write creatively next Wednesday. I am writing on The Quiet American under the Encountering Conflict context. My reasons for doing so are that I came into English 10 days before the first SAC this year (which was context) and wrote an expository piece on Paradise Road. While it scored really well, I felt that the style was really clunky and I did not like it much. When it came to our second context SAC, I spent a lot of time with The Quiet American and learnt a fair bit about its context and what not. Anyway, I came up with a story based on events in the book from the perspective of the minor character Captain Trouin. Basically I have the novel's protagonist, Fowler, and Captain Trouin in an opium den. Rather than having an electric current of narrative development running through my piece I chose to develop a reflective piece which relied on developing my own interpretation of Captain Trouin's character based on evidence in the text. I write from first person perspective, I have a few external events which occur to almost mark time in the piece, and a couple of character's off whom I am able to bounce ideas such as the prompt, but mostly it is an introspective piece which reflects on the prompt.

In this way I have developed a 'set piece' story in which the components are prepared but the discussion of ideas and expression is quite fluid. I feel that in this way I have an almost safe creative piece. It does not rely on whirlwind inspiration or last minute drastic change. Rather it is a scenario in which the major ideas represented by Captain Trouin and some aspects of The Quiet American can be discussed yet still allow me to show off somewhat. The initial SAC received full marks and a very unpolished version in an externally marked practice SAC still received an 8. I am feeling fairly confident that the development of a 'set piece' is an important aspect of my comfort with this approach as it means I am a man with a plan.

Just thought I would share some semblance of how I developed the piece I will be taking into section B. Here's hoping it goes well. 

Lolly

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 765
  • Respect: +114
Re: How to write a 20/20 Section B Creating and Presenting Context Piece
« Reply #53 on: October 25, 2013, 04:23:26 pm »
0
^I'm doing something along the lines of this, also based on TQA but in Fowler's voice. :)

chxara

  • Victorian
  • Fresh Poster
  • *
  • Posts: 1
  • Respect: 0
Re: How to write a 20/20 Section B Creating and Presenting Context Piece
« Reply #54 on: October 03, 2014, 11:17:09 pm »
0
Even though this is an old post, I thought I'd let you know this helped me so much. Thankyou, thankyou thankyou! Its really helped me understand how to actually repsond to a prompt & given me some confidence in writing :)

VivaTequila

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1136
  • Respect: +131
Re: How to write a 20/20 Section B Creating and Presenting Context Piece
« Reply #55 on: October 06, 2014, 11:17:36 pm »
0
Even though this is an old post, I thought I'd let you know this helped me so much. Thankyou, thankyou thankyou! Its really helped me understand how to actually repsond to a prompt & given me some confidence in writing :)

Hahah, you've made my day! No problems, I'm glad it's still helping current students out.

chansena

  • Victorian
  • Trailblazer
  • *
  • Posts: 49
  • Respect: +14
  • School Grad Year: 2015
Re: How to write a 20/20 Section B Creating and Presenting Context Piece
« Reply #56 on: April 10, 2015, 10:35:59 pm »
0
haha I'll add to that too I dread of doing part B as its too open and i think you highlighted the enormity of part B. and the key step is background research

thank you soo much for your advice from years Back aha.  Better start doing research this weekend then  ;)

(definitely bookmarking this thread)

2014 - Health & Human Development
2015 - English | Business Management | Further | Chemistry | Methods


"With But a Few Expectations it is Always the Underdog Who wins through Sheer Will Power" <-- (Motivational Quote )

Waiting4Pizza

  • Fresh Poster
  • *
  • Posts: 1
  • Respect: 0
  • School: Ballarat Grammar School
  • School Grad Year: 2016
Re: How to write a 20/20 Section B Creating and Presenting Context Piece
« Reply #57 on: September 27, 2015, 03:20:46 pm »
0
Hey I read your essay and it's great, but like how do I tell the difference between such rigorous analysis of author's motivations in a context essay and a text response? thanks