I have this due very soon, and I just cant seem to get much out of it. Its barely a paragraph, but have you got any ideas on what I could do with it?

The intro isnt here either because I normally do that last...
“I come also as a hero of the deed that till now was never attempted”.
How does Malouf explore this idea of heroism in Ransom?
Contrary to the stereotypical belief of a hero, Malouf explores whether a hero can truly be aspirable. To be a hero is stereotypically seen as a positive and self-fulfilling role in which an individual will feel proud and achieved, yet Malouf portrays the very opposite of this in “Ransom”. Malouf depicts this through Achilles; a half-god warrior who is lost within the 9 year battle for Troy. Achilles struggle to go on was emphasised when he struck the killing blow to Hector which was seen to be the most vital moment he had as a hero. However Malouf depicted this moment as a harsh and unsatisfying moment, as “still his grief was not consumed”. This is further shown in which Achilles becomes tormented with grief as he realises that he is without saving because his only redemption he knew had already been done. Through this Malouf shows the stereotypical hero to be one who is suffering and is therefore clearly not aspirable.
Malouf demonstrates to the reader that an individual doesn’t have to be a warrior to be a hero. Once again, Malouf shows the readers that the stereotype of a hero being a saviour relying on physical force to not always be the case. This is shown through Priam, and consolidated to a further extent when contrasted with Priam.
Please help, I'm stressing out :/