Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

April 01, 2026, 10:12:34 pm

Author Topic: correct term?  (Read 4996 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Kaille

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 264
  • oohhh football friend?
  • Respect: +6
  • School Grad Year: 2012
correct term?
« on: September 17, 2012, 04:45:27 pm »
0
Yesterday i worked hard

is this an example of an adverbial phrase?
B.Biomed, Melbourne 2013-

binders

  • Guest
Re: correct term?
« Reply #1 on: September 17, 2012, 04:56:21 pm »
+4
yesterday and hard are adverbial, but 'i worked' isn't. it's a noun phrase ('i'), and a verb phrase ('worked')

Kaille

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 264
  • oohhh football friend?
  • Respect: +6
  • School Grad Year: 2012
Re: correct term?
« Reply #2 on: September 17, 2012, 05:13:40 pm »
0
oh ok thanks :)
B.Biomed, Melbourne 2013-

Kaille

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 264
  • oohhh football friend?
  • Respect: +6
  • School Grad Year: 2012
Re: correct term?
« Reply #3 on: September 23, 2012, 05:41:59 pm »
0
another grammar issue,

happy people, adjective phrase or noun phrase?
B.Biomed, Melbourne 2013-

Starlight

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Superstar
  • ******
  • Posts: 2948
  • Respect: +275
Re: correct term?
« Reply #4 on: September 23, 2012, 06:09:25 pm »
+1
^ Noun phrase I think (studied this sort of stuff in uni).. but you can count happy as an AP
2012-2014. BSc: Neuroscience. University of Melbourne.
2015-2018. Doctor of Optometry. University of Melbourne.

Unlikely to respond to any PMs these days.

Kaille

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 264
  • oohhh football friend?
  • Respect: +6
  • School Grad Year: 2012
Re: correct term?
« Reply #5 on: September 23, 2012, 06:58:59 pm »
0
shank you!
B.Biomed, Melbourne 2013-

Kaille

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 264
  • oohhh football friend?
  • Respect: +6
  • School Grad Year: 2012
Re: correct term?
« Reply #6 on: September 26, 2012, 06:43:39 pm »
0
help again!

this one requires some context.

This is a conversation between a bunch of people discussing the negative aspects of the word "vag****" in the public domain.

So one guy goes, "i prefer saying front bottom" Can i say "front bottom" is a compound (being two words) neologism euphemism? or am i trying to squeeze in metalanguage that doesn't actualy apply?
B.Biomed, Melbourne 2013-

Starlight

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Superstar
  • ******
  • Posts: 2948
  • Respect: +275
Re: correct term?
« Reply #7 on: September 26, 2012, 07:16:44 pm »
+1
If it was an essay and if you were going to talk about what it is, you might say the euphemism 'front bottom', specifically a compound, ....

Haha I have no idea what neologism is.
2012-2014. BSc: Neuroscience. University of Melbourne.
2015-2018. Doctor of Optometry. University of Melbourne.

Unlikely to respond to any PMs these days.

Kaille

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 264
  • oohhh football friend?
  • Respect: +6
  • School Grad Year: 2012
Re: correct term?
« Reply #8 on: September 26, 2012, 07:33:53 pm »
0
thanks!

a neologism is kinda like a made up word. lol
B.Biomed, Melbourne 2013-

RTandon

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 302
  • Forever a fob
  • Respect: +31
  • School Grad Year: 2012
Re: correct term?
« Reply #9 on: September 26, 2012, 07:36:10 pm »
+1
I think it can be a compound and euphemism but not a neologism, since that is a new made up word and technically front bottom isn't made up... I think. Haha :P
Accounting | English Language | Product & Design | Psychology | Business Management | Methods

A fashion designer in the making ;)

golden

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1065
  • Sharpshot
  • Respect: +102
  • School: VSC
  • School Grad Year: 2011
Re: correct term?
« Reply #10 on: September 26, 2012, 07:39:43 pm »
0
I think it can be a compound and euphemism but not a neologism, since that is a new made up word and technically front bottom isn't made up... I think. Haha :P

If it isn't part of the norm (do many people know of this term) to use it I think it would be a neologism. Whether it is; this is another story.
2014: Microbiology/Immunology Major.

Thanks to (alphabetical order):
2010: appianway. 2011: Kamil9876, laseredd, xZero. 2012: dc302, harper, marr.
Multiple times: pi, Russ, stonecold, TT.

Starlight

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Superstar
  • ******
  • Posts: 2948
  • Respect: +275
Re: correct term?
« Reply #11 on: September 26, 2012, 07:44:48 pm »
+1
Hmm.. seems problematic, i'd avoid the term neologism in that case
2012-2014. BSc: Neuroscience. University of Melbourne.
2015-2018. Doctor of Optometry. University of Melbourne.

Unlikely to respond to any PMs these days.

golden

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1065
  • Sharpshot
  • Respect: +102
  • School: VSC
  • School Grad Year: 2011
Re: correct term?
« Reply #12 on: September 26, 2012, 07:48:35 pm »
0
Hmm.. seems problematic, i'd avoid the term neologism in that case

Yeah true. If you really wanted to use it though lol just completely make something up as an example (hehe).
2014: Microbiology/Immunology Major.

Thanks to (alphabetical order):
2010: appianway. 2011: Kamil9876, laseredd, xZero. 2012: dc302, harper, marr.
Multiple times: pi, Russ, stonecold, TT.

kensan

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 692
  • Do you even lift?
  • Respect: +20
  • School: L.C.
  • School Grad Year: 2012
Re: correct term?
« Reply #13 on: September 26, 2012, 07:51:37 pm »
0
I don't think it is a neologism as 'front' and 'bottom' are already existing words, so it would be just compounding as well as a euphemism.
2013: BSc at UoM

Kaille

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 264
  • oohhh football friend?
  • Respect: +6
  • School Grad Year: 2012
Re: correct term?
« Reply #14 on: September 26, 2012, 08:15:54 pm »
0
I was thinking it was a neologism because together "front bottom" together has undergone semantic shift, but true, they aren't new words.

Also, i know i'm going back on what i said eariler but im beginning to doubt myself. is it really a compound? wouldn't that require the words to be directly joined? :S
B.Biomed, Melbourne 2013-