How did you go?

[s.ay]

but would it damage my response badly?

[connej]

but would it damage my response badly?

no, not at all. It really doesn't matter

[s.ay]

phew. Thanks for the reassurance! Can't stand realising things that I forgot to do

[Dejan]

but would it damage my response badly?

No not at all

[ai-linator]

I thought it was a relatively straight-forward exam - France Part 1 was great and China Part 2 was stellar. However France part 2 was HARD (not that I did it, but those I know who did regretted it.)
Anyway, I was wondering if I don't refer to historians views as being 'marxist' or 'revisionist' in France is that still okay? I know it was such a dumb thing to do.

[matthew94]

However France part 2 was HARD (not that I did it, but those I know who did regretted it.)

Really? I thought France section B was great! The visual wasn't too bad, and the essay prompt was really good

I was wondering if I don't refer to historians views as being 'marxist' or 'revisionist' in France is that still okay? I know it was such a dumb thing to do.

As long as you named the historians themselves I think you should be fine

[ai-linator]

Really? I thought France section B was great! The visual wasn't too bad, and the essay prompt was really good

I don't know, I thought the opposite? I thought the visual was hard, mostly because I'm an idiot and I couldn't identify during the exam who the second figure was (not the clergy dude.) Plus, I reckon France essays are always difficult because the whole revolution itself is insane.