Particular exams/

[GoodGuys]

Hey guys,

Just like to ask you guys if you know the difficulty rates of some practice exams.
For example, CSE(IARTV), iNSIGHT, TSSM, QAT.

Which company would be closest to the vcaa exams? and is the vcaa exam easier than these companies?

[Noblesse]

I'm fairly sure Insight was a good representation of VCAA's difficulty.
QAT are rather different if I recall correctly.
CSE have a lot of mistakes (in all their exams!)

[nbalakers24]

dont do A+ exams, they are rubbish.

i remember there was a question that said: explain why depreciation improves reliability.

[azr.3991]

true that immensely, the A+ are terrible
didnt even do the correct marking scheme (47 for 1st question, 43 for 2nd)
go over a couple of the past VCAA exams, e.g. 2003-2006 ( i know the course has been updated but theyre still decent, with quite a bit of relevant parts  - ignore post reference and any other methods of dep'n)
ummm the VCTA ones are aight
TSSM decent, Neap ones tend to be orientated around theory
 VCTA preparing for the exams are decent
and yeah thats all i can think of at the top of my head,
if i remember any more ill post here 

[rhjc.1991]

Briefly:

quality:
TSSM
Neap
Insight
CSE
VCTA
QAT

difficulty:
2008 VCAA
Neap
QAT
VCTA
Insight
CSE
2007 VCAA




































>A+ Exams (never ever do them. On this note, don't even TOUCH the double profit textbook/A+ notes)

[nbalakers24]

is unit 4 a+ notes/prac exams just as shit as unit 3?

[Flaming_Arrow]

Compak due to ambigious questions

[GoodGuys]

Compak due to ambigious questions

Compak sucks!!

[nbalakers24]

agreed