Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

October 15, 2025, 09:40:44 am

Author Topic: Chemistry 3/4 2013 Thread  (Read 446056 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Edward21

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 625
  • Don't ask me, all I do is calculate pH.
  • Respect: +27
Re: Chemistry 3/4 2013 Thread
« Reply #1695 on: November 06, 2013, 10:06:10 pm »
0
Well, I think you should know you can separate chemicals based on boiling points. That's really all there is to the 'principles of fractional distillation', and it's a pretty straightforward concept. It may not be mentioned explicitly, but I've come across a few worded questions asking how to obtain pure solutions of a substance, or separate a mixture of chemicals, and based on their boiling points is a pretty easy way to answer it.

The actual process of fractional distillation is not on the course though.
Like the 2011 U3 that asked about a pure product (ester) from distillation, but referred to IR data to confirm this.  :)
2012 Biology [44] 2013 Chemistry [50] Italian [38] English [48] Health & HD [45] Methods [34] ATAR: 99.10

2014-2016 Bachelor of Biomedicine - The University of Melbourne


lolipopper

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 317
  • I'm making aaaalll kaaindzzz of gaains
  • Respect: -4
  • School: Lalor North Secondary College
  • School Grad Year: 2013
Re: Chemistry 3/4 2013 Thread
« Reply #1696 on: November 06, 2013, 10:10:30 pm »
0
I Adding a catalyst
II Increasing temperature
III Increasing concentration
IV Increasing the surface area of the reactant

out of the following which ones always ensure an increase in reaction rate?

Answer : I, II, III

why is it not the case with surface area? and if surface area doesn't affect the rate, then why does increasing the concentration, because aren't both of them essentially doing the same thing [exposing more reactant particles to each other?]
2014: Monash University, Law

SocialRhubarb

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 313
  • Respect: +34
  • School Grad Year: 2013
Re: Chemistry 3/4 2013 Thread
« Reply #1697 on: November 06, 2013, 10:13:07 pm »
0
What if the reactant is gaseous?
Fight me.

lolipopper

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 317
  • I'm making aaaalll kaaindzzz of gaains
  • Respect: -4
  • School: Lalor North Secondary College
  • School Grad Year: 2013
Re: Chemistry 3/4 2013 Thread
« Reply #1698 on: November 06, 2013, 10:22:28 pm »
0
What if the reactant is gaseous?

true. any other reasons?
2014: Monash University, Law

lzxnl

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 3432
  • Respect: +215
Re: Chemistry 3/4 2013 Thread
« Reply #1699 on: November 06, 2013, 10:30:14 pm »
0
How DO you define the surface area of a gas?
2012
Mathematical Methods (50) Chinese SL (45~52)

2013
English Language (50) Chemistry (50) Specialist Mathematics (49~54.9) Physics (49) UMEP Physics (96%) ATAR 99.95

2014-2016: University of Melbourne, Bachelor of Science, Diploma in Mathematical Sciences (Applied Maths)

2017-2018: Master of Science (Applied Mathematics)

2019-2024: PhD, MIT (Applied Mathematics)

Accepting students for VCE tutoring in Maths Methods, Specialist Maths and Physics! (and university maths/physics too) PM for more details

SocialRhubarb

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 313
  • Respect: +34
  • School Grad Year: 2013
Re: Chemistry 3/4 2013 Thread
« Reply #1700 on: November 06, 2013, 10:33:50 pm »
+1
How DO you define the surface area of a gas?

Arbitrarily.
Fight me.

lzxnl

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 3432
  • Respect: +215
Re: Chemistry 3/4 2013 Thread
« Reply #1701 on: November 06, 2013, 10:37:34 pm »
0
Isn't that a contradiction? To define something arbitrarily?
2012
Mathematical Methods (50) Chinese SL (45~52)

2013
English Language (50) Chemistry (50) Specialist Mathematics (49~54.9) Physics (49) UMEP Physics (96%) ATAR 99.95

2014-2016: University of Melbourne, Bachelor of Science, Diploma in Mathematical Sciences (Applied Maths)

2017-2018: Master of Science (Applied Mathematics)

2019-2024: PhD, MIT (Applied Mathematics)

Accepting students for VCE tutoring in Maths Methods, Specialist Maths and Physics! (and university maths/physics too) PM for more details

Aurelian

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 585
  • Respect: +79
  • School: Melbourne Grammar School
  • School Grad Year: 2011
Re: Chemistry 3/4 2013 Thread
« Reply #1702 on: November 06, 2013, 10:38:52 pm »
+2
Isn't that a contradiction? To define something arbitrarily?

I would've actually thought it was a tautology :P All definitions are "arbitrary" (at least in a logical sense)...
VCE 2010-2011:
English | Philosophy | Latin | Chemistry | Physics | Methods | UMEP Philosophy
ATAR: 99.95

2012-2014: BSc (Chemistry/Philosophy) @ UniMelb

Currently taking students for summer chemistry and physics tutoring! PM for details.

lolipopper

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 317
  • I'm making aaaalll kaaindzzz of gaains
  • Respect: -4
  • School: Lalor North Secondary College
  • School Grad Year: 2013
Re: Chemistry 3/4 2013 Thread
« Reply #1703 on: November 06, 2013, 10:46:22 pm »
0
How DO you define the surface area of a gas?

doesn't a gaseous reactant have maximum surface area anyway?
2014: Monash University, Law

lzxnl

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 3432
  • Respect: +215
Re: Chemistry 3/4 2013 Thread
« Reply #1704 on: November 06, 2013, 10:49:47 pm »
0
You can't define the surface area of a gas I think
2012
Mathematical Methods (50) Chinese SL (45~52)

2013
English Language (50) Chemistry (50) Specialist Mathematics (49~54.9) Physics (49) UMEP Physics (96%) ATAR 99.95

2014-2016: University of Melbourne, Bachelor of Science, Diploma in Mathematical Sciences (Applied Maths)

2017-2018: Master of Science (Applied Mathematics)

2019-2024: PhD, MIT (Applied Mathematics)

Accepting students for VCE tutoring in Maths Methods, Specialist Maths and Physics! (and university maths/physics too) PM for more details

Dismounted

  • Victorian
  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 107
  • Respect: +19
Re: Chemistry 3/4 2013 Thread
« Reply #1705 on: November 07, 2013, 03:43:38 pm »
0
doesn't a gaseous reactant have maximum surface area anyway?
Yeah, you can't really increase the "surface area" of a gas since each molecule is already individually separated from one another.
Science @ The University of Melbourne
2012 ATAR: 99.80 | Chemistry: 50 | PE: 50 + Premier's Award

neonperson

  • Victorian
  • Trailblazer
  • *
  • Posts: 35
  • Respect: 0
  • School Grad Year: 2013
Re: Chemistry 3/4 2013 Thread
« Reply #1706 on: November 07, 2013, 06:09:39 pm »
0
For VCAA 2012 U3 Short answer question 7) ai.

Why is the equation for the precipitate with the equilibirum arrows?
Here is link to assessor's report
http://www.vcaa.vic.edu.au/Documents/exams/chemistry/Chem1_assessrep_12.pdf
2012 - Chinese | Maths Methods

2013 - Chemistry | English | Economics | Biology

ATAR: 98.10

lzxnl

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 3432
  • Respect: +215
Re: Chemistry 3/4 2013 Thread
« Reply #1707 on: November 07, 2013, 06:27:09 pm »
0
Precipitation is an equilibrium reaction too.
2012
Mathematical Methods (50) Chinese SL (45~52)

2013
English Language (50) Chemistry (50) Specialist Mathematics (49~54.9) Physics (49) UMEP Physics (96%) ATAR 99.95

2014-2016: University of Melbourne, Bachelor of Science, Diploma in Mathematical Sciences (Applied Maths)

2017-2018: Master of Science (Applied Mathematics)

2019-2024: PhD, MIT (Applied Mathematics)

Accepting students for VCE tutoring in Maths Methods, Specialist Maths and Physics! (and university maths/physics too) PM for more details

neonperson

  • Victorian
  • Trailblazer
  • *
  • Posts: 35
  • Respect: 0
  • School Grad Year: 2013
Re: Chemistry 3/4 2013 Thread
« Reply #1708 on: November 07, 2013, 07:57:56 pm »
0
Precipitation is an equilibrium reaction too.

Always?
2012 - Chinese | Maths Methods

2013 - Chemistry | English | Economics | Biology

ATAR: 98.10

lzxnl

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 3432
  • Respect: +215
Re: Chemistry 3/4 2013 Thread
« Reply #1709 on: November 07, 2013, 08:36:39 pm »
+2
ALWAYS.

It's just that sometimes, like the precipitation of iron hydroxide, you can't detect an equilibrium.
2012
Mathematical Methods (50) Chinese SL (45~52)

2013
English Language (50) Chemistry (50) Specialist Mathematics (49~54.9) Physics (49) UMEP Physics (96%) ATAR 99.95

2014-2016: University of Melbourne, Bachelor of Science, Diploma in Mathematical Sciences (Applied Maths)

2017-2018: Master of Science (Applied Mathematics)

2019-2024: PhD, MIT (Applied Mathematics)

Accepting students for VCE tutoring in Maths Methods, Specialist Maths and Physics! (and university maths/physics too) PM for more details