Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

November 01, 2025, 11:44:33 am

Author Topic: Chemistry 3/4 2013 Thread  (Read 448756 times)  Share 

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

lzxnl

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 3432
  • Respect: +215
Re: Chemistry 3/4 2013 Thread
« Reply #945 on: June 10, 2013, 10:12:57 pm »
+2
So if we're adding three stearic acid (C17H35COOH) molecules to glycerol
I'm sure we could write it as HOCH(OOC(CH2)16CH3)CH(OOC(CH2)16CH3)CH(OOC(CH2)16CH3)OH
although admittedly it looks ugly.
2012
Mathematical Methods (50) Chinese SL (45~52)

2013
English Language (50) Chemistry (50) Specialist Mathematics (49~54.9) Physics (49) UMEP Physics (96%) ATAR 99.95

2014-2016: University of Melbourne, Bachelor of Science, Diploma in Mathematical Sciences (Applied Maths)

2017-2018: Master of Science (Applied Mathematics)

2019-2024: PhD, MIT (Applied Mathematics)

Accepting students for VCE tutoring in Maths Methods, Specialist Maths and Physics! (and university maths/physics too) PM for more details

Homer

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 431
  • Respect: +10
Re: Chemistry 3/4 2013 Thread
« Reply #946 on: June 13, 2013, 07:37:00 pm »
0
VCAA 2008 Exam 1, Short answers Question 2 bii

why do they multiply 35 with 100/25

why isn't it 35 x 25/100?

Thanks
Bachelor of Laws/Engineering

2013 ATAR: 98.65

Specialist Maths [53.06] Maths Methods [48.83] Physics [48.22]

Donuts. Is there anything they can't do?

Edward21

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 625
  • Don't ask me, all I do is calculate pH.
  • Respect: +27
Re: Chemistry 3/4 2013 Thread
« Reply #947 on: June 13, 2013, 08:02:38 pm »
0
VCAA 2008 Exam 1, Short answers Question 2 bii

why do they multiply 35 with 100/25

why isn't it 35 x 25/100?

Thanks
Hmmm look, the way I look at it is if the concentration is 35mg/L, multiply that by 0.1L (100mL) to get 3.5mg of MnO4- in the 25mL! So the ratio is want/have ie. 1000mL (the whole initial solutions)/25mL (have) times the 3.5mg = 140mg present in total, which is the right answer. But that's just my way. If you want to work by the VCAA way (remember there's an endless way to do these things yet still get the same answer!)

How they did it is, they worked backwards via DILUTION FACTORS. Basically you calculate what the solution was made up to divided by what it was and times by the concentration you found to work backwards to the original concentration of the solution. Ie. 35(mg/L) is what the concentrations is X (100mL what is was made up to)/(25mL the original volume of the solution) therefore 35mg/L times 100/25 = 140mg/L is the original concentration, and we have 1L of this solution (oh how very neat VCAA....) therefore the amount in 1L is literally just the 140mg like I said before, as it's 140mg per litre, and we want to find how much is in 1L ie. multiply by 1  ;) did that make sense?
2012 Biology [44] 2013 Chemistry [50] Italian [38] English [48] Health & HD [45] Methods [34] ATAR: 99.10

2014-2016 Bachelor of Biomedicine - The University of Melbourne


Edward21

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 625
  • Don't ask me, all I do is calculate pH.
  • Respect: +27
Re: Chemistry 3/4 2013 Thread
« Reply #948 on: June 13, 2013, 08:05:07 pm »
0
Hmmm look, the way I look at it is if the concentration is 35mg/L, multiply that by 0.1L (100mL) to get 3.5mg of MnO4- in the 25mL! So the ratio is want/have ie. 1000mL (the whole initial solutions)/25mL (have) times the 3.5mg = 140mg present in total, which is the right answer. But that's just my way. If you want to work by the VCAA way (remember there's an endless way to do these things yet still get the same answer!)

How they did it is, they worked backwards via DILUTION FACTORS. Basically you calculate what the solution was made up to divided by what it was and times by the concentration you found to work backwards to the original concentration of the solution. Ie. 35(mg/L) is what the concentrations is X (100mL what is was made up to)/(25mL the original volume of the solution) therefore 35mg/L times 100/25 = 140mg/L is the original concentration, and we have 1L of this solution (oh how very neat VCAA....) therefore the amount in 1L is literally just the 140mg like I said before, as it's 140mg per litre, and we want to find how much is in 1L ie. multiply by 1  ;) did that make sense?
Dilution factor of 4! (100/25) sorry got a step ahead of myself. Remember dilution factor is V(made up to)/V(initial) then multiply this by the concentrated of the diluted solution, to find the concentration of the original solution before it was diluted. :) C1V1=C2V2 simplifies this, but essentially you are calculating a dilution factor
« Last Edit: June 13, 2013, 08:14:13 pm by Edward21 »
2012 Biology [44] 2013 Chemistry [50] Italian [38] English [48] Health & HD [45] Methods [34] ATAR: 99.10

2014-2016 Bachelor of Biomedicine - The University of Melbourne


random_person

  • Victorian
  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 116
  • Respect: +5
Re: Chemistry 3/4 2013 Thread
« Reply #949 on: June 13, 2013, 08:11:08 pm »
0
VCAA 2008 Exam 1, Short answers Question 2 bii

why do they multiply 35 with 100/25

why isn't it 35 x 25/100?

Thanks











Therefore, there is of in sample (as the sample is made up to 1.00 L

in =

  of 

to two sig figs

« Last Edit: June 13, 2013, 08:21:06 pm by random_person »


2012: Further Mathematics [50] (Premier's Award)
2013: English | Physics | Mathematical Methods | Specialist Mathematics | Chemistry
Bachelor of Medicine/Bachelor of Surgery (Honours)

PM me any questions about the UMAT and Monash Medicine!

Jeggz

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 493
  • Respect: +42
  • School: Presbyterian Ladies' College
  • School Grad Year: 2013
Re: Chemistry 3/4 2013 Thread
« Reply #950 on: June 13, 2013, 08:12:34 pm »
0
What would the equation be to prove that NaOH must be standardised?  :)
Melbourne University - Commerce; Actuarial Studies.

Tutoring 2015 - Email/PM for places!

Edward21

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 625
  • Don't ask me, all I do is calculate pH.
  • Respect: +27
Re: Chemistry 3/4 2013 Thread
« Reply #951 on: June 13, 2013, 08:16:30 pm »
+4
What would the equation be to prove that NaOH must be standardised?  :)
2NaOH(s)+CO2(g) --> Na2CO3(s) + H2O(l)

The sodium hydroxide can't be used as a primary standard, it can react with CO2(g) in the air, thus it's composition cannot be entirely known unless recently standardised because of the above reaction :)
2012 Biology [44] 2013 Chemistry [50] Italian [38] English [48] Health & HD [45] Methods [34] ATAR: 99.10

2014-2016 Bachelor of Biomedicine - The University of Melbourne


Jeggz

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 493
  • Respect: +42
  • School: Presbyterian Ladies' College
  • School Grad Year: 2013
Re: Chemistry 3/4 2013 Thread
« Reply #952 on: June 13, 2013, 08:18:49 pm »
0
You're a life saver- thanks buddy  :)
Melbourne University - Commerce; Actuarial Studies.

Tutoring 2015 - Email/PM for places!

Edward21

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 625
  • Don't ask me, all I do is calculate pH.
  • Respect: +27
Re: Chemistry 3/4 2013 Thread
« Reply #953 on: June 13, 2013, 08:26:19 pm »
+2
You're a life saver- thanks buddy  :)
No probs, remember I used (s) to represent this if it occurred whilst the NaOH in its solid powder form, reaction with CO2(g).
You could have both the NaOH and Na2CO3 with (aq) states if you left a solution of NaOH(aq) and CO2(g) reacts with it  ;)
2012 Biology [44] 2013 Chemistry [50] Italian [38] English [48] Health & HD [45] Methods [34] ATAR: 99.10

2014-2016 Bachelor of Biomedicine - The University of Melbourne


LOLs99

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1142
  • Respect: +7
Re: Chemistry 3/4 2013 Thread
« Reply #954 on: June 14, 2013, 10:51:40 pm »
0
What is the state for I2 in half equation for the reaction of iodine. Is It in aq or liquid
2014-2016: 

2017-2018: Master of Engineering

lzxnl

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 3432
  • Respect: +215
Re: Chemistry 3/4 2013 Thread
« Reply #955 on: June 14, 2013, 10:55:39 pm »
0
Iodine is naturally found in solid form. However reactions with solids aren't as fast as reactions with the same solids in solution as the rate of collision is greatly maximized. Therefore generally we have dissolved iodine.
2012
Mathematical Methods (50) Chinese SL (45~52)

2013
English Language (50) Chemistry (50) Specialist Mathematics (49~54.9) Physics (49) UMEP Physics (96%) ATAR 99.95

2014-2016: University of Melbourne, Bachelor of Science, Diploma in Mathematical Sciences (Applied Maths)

2017-2018: Master of Science (Applied Mathematics)

2019-2024: PhD, MIT (Applied Mathematics)

Accepting students for VCE tutoring in Maths Methods, Specialist Maths and Physics! (and university maths/physics too) PM for more details

LOLs99

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1142
  • Respect: +7
Re: Chemistry 3/4 2013 Thread
« Reply #956 on: June 14, 2013, 11:44:08 pm »
0
So aqueous or liquid form is acceptable?
2014-2016: 

2017-2018: Master of Engineering

lzxnl

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 3432
  • Respect: +215
Re: Chemistry 3/4 2013 Thread
« Reply #957 on: June 15, 2013, 11:57:31 am »
0
Liquid form implies undissolved liquid iodine or pure liquid iodine, which generally we don't have, so aqueous, not liquid.
2012
Mathematical Methods (50) Chinese SL (45~52)

2013
English Language (50) Chemistry (50) Specialist Mathematics (49~54.9) Physics (49) UMEP Physics (96%) ATAR 99.95

2014-2016: University of Melbourne, Bachelor of Science, Diploma in Mathematical Sciences (Applied Maths)

2017-2018: Master of Science (Applied Mathematics)

2019-2024: PhD, MIT (Applied Mathematics)

Accepting students for VCE tutoring in Maths Methods, Specialist Maths and Physics! (and university maths/physics too) PM for more details

LOLs99

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1142
  • Respect: +7
Re: Chemistry 3/4 2013 Thread
« Reply #958 on: June 15, 2013, 01:02:43 pm »
0
Okay thanks
2014-2016: 

2017-2018: Master of Engineering

Edward21

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 625
  • Don't ask me, all I do is calculate pH.
  • Respect: +27
Re: Chemistry 3/4 2013 Thread
« Reply #959 on: June 15, 2013, 11:56:28 pm »
0
Has anyone here tried out the Heinamann textbook's exam paper 1? I'd like to know how you guys found it in terms of difficulty :)
2012 Biology [44] 2013 Chemistry [50] Italian [38] English [48] Health & HD [45] Methods [34] ATAR: 99.10

2014-2016 Bachelor of Biomedicine - The University of Melbourne