I'm also doing better than what I expected, but since Legal and Bio are two completely different types of subjects, I just have to learn to balance them. In my opinion, legal is more of a rote learning kind of subject because you can just memorize answers to questions and do well by just regurgitating these answers back onto your SAC (but there's a lot to remember), while in Biology you're required to understand the topics in depth as well as experimental design,etc. But overall, I'm doing okay I guess.
Don't fall into this trap on the exam. I think legal is often underestimated because of SACs that aren't as well written as the exam (understandable). I agree, it can be rote learned significantly more than other subjects, however, you'll find when you start doing practice exams that the real skill in legal studies is breaking down the marks,
correctly interpreting the question, understanding the content. This last point, you might disagree with me on because you've been rote learning, however, you might just have a natural understanding that comes from rote learning and you just don't recognise that natural understanding. Reading a definition 100 times does not exclude the ability to understand that definition. If you memorised definitions, memorised the questions that match those definitions, and tried to do a 'pair up' game on the exam, you'd get fucked pretty hard.
My expression when I read that: WUT O.O
Likewise.