Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

July 22, 2025, 07:03:44 pm

Author Topic: Yacoubb's Bio 3+4 Questions  (Read 106130 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

alondouek

  • Subject Review God
  • Honorary Moderator
  • ATAR Notes Superstar
  • *******
  • Posts: 2903
  • Oh to be a Gooner!
  • Respect: +316
  • School: Leibler Yavneh College
  • School Grad Year: 2012
Re: Yacoubb's Bio 3+4 Questions
« Reply #300 on: October 20, 2013, 07:34:48 pm »
0
Did u no the nervous system ALSO regulates the migration of immune cells? :D

Learnt this on Friday :D
2013-2016
Majoring in Genetics and Developmental Biology

2012 ATAR: 96.55
English [48] Biology [40]

Need a driving instructor? Mobility Driving School

Yacoubb

  • Guest
Re: Yacoubb's Bio 3+4 Questions
« Reply #301 on: October 20, 2013, 07:39:55 pm »
0
Did u no the nervous system ALSO regulates the migration of immune cells? :D

Ooh, could you elaborate? Sounds interesting!

Snorlax

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 371
  • Snore 'n relax
  • Respect: 0
Re: Yacoubb's Bio 3+4 Questions
« Reply #302 on: October 21, 2013, 08:41:21 pm »
0
About this question that was mentioned before
A tissue that has been responsive to hormone X may, over time, lose its response to hormone X, even
though the concentration of hormone X remains unchanged.
Based on your understanding of how a hormone controls the functioning of cells, suggest reasons for
this decrease in responsiveness.


Any ideas on a response..?
I remember confronting this question, and had no idea..
2014:
ATAR: 99.96

2015:
B.Sc @ UniMelb
Neuroscience Major

2018:
????????

Yacoubb

  • Guest
Re: Yacoubb's Bio 3+4 Questions
« Reply #303 on: October 21, 2013, 09:48:54 pm »
0
About this question that was mentioned before
A tissue that has been responsive to hormone X may, over time, lose its response to hormone X, even
though the concentration of hormone X remains unchanged.
Based on your understanding of how a hormone controls the functioning of cells, suggest reasons for
this decrease in responsiveness.


Any ideas on a response..?
I remember confronting this question, and had no idea..

I think a reasonable solution would be that by increased concentrations of hormone X, the protein receptor conformational shape can be altered and the hormone can no longer effectively bind to the receptor. Also, overstimulating these cells could result in cells no longer responding to this hormone.

^^ but I'd get that clarified as I'm not 100% sure of its accuracy.

Irving4Prez

  • Guest
Re: Yacoubb's Bio 3+4 Questions
« Reply #304 on: October 21, 2013, 10:35:13 pm »
0
I think a reasonable solution would be that by increased concentrations of hormone X, the protein receptor conformational shape can be altered and the hormone can no longer effectively bind to the receptor. Also, overstimulating these cells could result in cells no longer responding to this hormone.

The concentration of hormone x remains unchanged over the duration of their life. Wouldn't an over stimulation result from an increase in hormone conc.? However, I think Yacoubb is right as the conformational shape of the specific receptor would have changed.
« Last Edit: October 21, 2013, 10:36:50 pm by Irving4Prez »

Bad Student

  • Guest
Re: Yacoubb's Bio 3+4 Questions
« Reply #305 on: October 21, 2013, 11:19:47 pm »
0
I think the product of the biochemical pathway initiated by the binding of hormone x to the receptor inhibits the response by binding to the specific receptor for hormone x.

Stick

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 3774
  • Sticky. :P
  • Respect: +467
Re: Yacoubb's Bio 3+4 Questions
« Reply #306 on: October 22, 2013, 03:10:54 pm »
0
It could perhaps have something to do with gene regulation too. The genes expressed by a particular type of cell may change during various stages of growth and development (an example escapes me for the minute but it does happen).
2017-2020: Doctor of Medicine - The University of Melbourne
2014-2016: Bachelor of Biomedicine - The University of Melbourne

Yacoubb

  • Guest
Re: Yacoubb's Bio 3+4 Questions
« Reply #307 on: October 22, 2013, 04:53:37 pm »
0
It could perhaps have something to do with gene regulation too. The genes expressed by a particular type of cell may change during various stages of growth and development (an example escapes me for the minute but it does happen).

It's a suggest type question so surely justifying it in some way would be sufficient to get the full marks! :)

simpak

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 3587
  • Respect: +376
Re: Yacoubb's Bio 3+4 Questions
« Reply #308 on: October 22, 2013, 05:04:21 pm »
+1
There are legit infinite possibilities but here are some:

1.  Binding of hormone X causes internalisation of receptor-ligand complex so that receptors are no longer expressed on the cell surface.
2.  Binding of hormone X alters the expression of the gene encoding the receptor for hormone X such that it is no longer expressed (a negative feedback type model)
3.  Binding of hormone X causes the cell to produce hormone Y, which feeds back on the same cell (autocrine signalling) and reception of hormone Y inhibits components of the signalling cascade triggered by hormone X (classical negative feedback)
2009 ENTER: 99.05
2014: BSci Hons (Microbiology/Immunology) at UoM
2015+: PhD (Immunology) at UoM

Irving4Prez

  • Guest
Re: Yacoubb's Bio 3+4 Questions
« Reply #309 on: October 22, 2013, 06:23:20 pm »
0
Does the hyper variable regions in mtDNA mutate faster than those found in nuclear DNA? I initially thought it did but according to my teacher, it's the other way around

vox nihili

  • National Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *****
  • Posts: 5343
  • Respect: +1447
Re: Yacoubb's Bio 3+4 Questions
« Reply #310 on: October 22, 2013, 06:39:30 pm »
+1
Does the hyper variable regions in mtDNA mutate faster than those found in nuclear DNA? I initially thought it did but according to my teacher, it's the other way around

mtDNA mutates more slowly than nuclear DNA. This is because mutations in mtDNA are usually a hell of a lot worse than in nuclear DNA (think of what mtDNA is coding for!). Hypervariable, annoyingly, just means that there are heaps of molymorphisms, which is true. mtDNA is usually used in genealogical analysis though and is a pretty good way of detecting someone's ancestral roots. The other reason for that though is that it doesn't undergo any form of recombination!
2013-15: BBiomed (Biochemistry and Molecular Biology), UniMelb
2016-20: MD, UniMelb
2019-20: MPH, UniMelb
2021-: GDipBiostat, USyd

Yacoubb

  • Guest
Re: Yacoubb's Bio 3+4 Questions
« Reply #311 on: October 22, 2013, 08:49:15 pm »
0
Does the hyper variable regions in mtDNA mutate faster than those found in nuclear DNA? I initially thought it did but according to my teacher, it's the other way around

The D loop in the hypervariable region of mtDNA has a very high mutation rate. This can be used t observe the evolutionary relationship between not so distantly-related species. However, the coding region of mtDNA has a very low mutation rate and so is used to determine the evolutionary relationship between distantly related species with common ancestry.

FunkyAfrican

  • Victorian
  • Trailblazer
  • *
  • Posts: 40
  • Respect: 0
  • School Grad Year: 2013
Re: Yacoubb's Bio 3+4 Questions
« Reply #312 on: October 22, 2013, 09:53:29 pm »
0
Hey I've got a few questions

* Upon second encounter with a particular pathogen, I know the immune response is much faster and greater due to the presence of B-memory cells which recognize the antigen and know exactly which antibodies to create. But exactly how does the presence of B-memory cells speed up the rate and strength of the response? Does it mean that there is no need for plasma cells to undergo proliferation?

*And also, I came across a question asking why mast cells are perceived to play a positive role in the inflammatory response, but a negative role in hypersensitivity reactions.
I'm aware of their role in allergic response, but unsure of how they aid the inflammatory one.

*Finally, is the action of mast cells specific or non-specific?

Thanks guys  :)

Professor_Oak

  • Victorian
  • Trailblazer
  • *
  • Posts: 42
  • Monash BMedSci/MD V
  • Respect: 0
Re: Yacoubb's Bio 3+4 Questions
« Reply #313 on: October 22, 2013, 10:55:08 pm »
+1
Hey guys just wondering with autoimmune diseases which aspect of the immune system is destroying the self cells, the cytotoxic T cells or the B cells and antibodies? Also how are eukaryotic pathogens destroyed? I assumed the phagocytes would be too small to engulf them thus agglutination would be ineffective.
2014: Chemistry [50], English Language [47]
ATAR: 99.85

2015-2020: BMedSci/MD (Monash)

Tutoring for Chemistry and English Language in the eastern suburbs! Check here for info: http://evolveacademics.com.au/weekly-classes/

Yacoubb

  • Guest
Re: Yacoubb's Bio 3+4 Questions
« Reply #314 on: October 22, 2013, 11:06:13 pm »
+1
Hey guys just wondering with autoimmune diseases which aspect of the immune system is destroying the self cells, the cytotoxic T cells or the B cells and antibodies? Also how are eukaryotic pathogens destroyed? I assumed the phagocytes would be too small to engulf them thus agglutination would be ineffective.

With autoimmune diseases, cytotoxic T-cells are primarily involved. Of course, helper T-cells activate cytotoxic T cells to act on self cells. Cytotoxic T-cells release perforin (a cytotoxic protein) that punches holes through the plasma membrane of these self cells, resulting in these cells lysing.

Hey I've got a few questions

* Upon second encounter with a particular pathogen, I know the immune response is much faster and greater due to the presence of B-memory cells which recognize the antigen and know exactly which antibodies to create. But exactly how does the presence of B-memory cells speed up the rate and strength of the response? Does it mean that there is no need for plasma cells to undergo proliferation?

*And also, I came across a question asking why mast cells are perceived to play a positive role in the inflammatory response, but a negative role in hypersensitivity reactions.
I'm aware of their role in allergic response, but unsure of how they aid the inflammatory one.

*Finally, is the action of mast cells specific or non-specific?

Thanks guys  :)

I'll start off with your last question. You cannot really ask whether a mast cell is specific or non-specific. It really depends on the situation it is involved in. For instance, mast cells, which are found on the lining of blood vessels, release histamine during an inflammatory response to attract phagocytes to the infective area. In this instance, it is non-specific. Why? Mast cells release histamine to attract phagocytes irrespective of the types of pathogens that have penetrated the internal environment of the organism. However, when looking at hypersensitivities against allergens, the IgE antibodies that bind to the outer surface of these mast cells having paratopes (antigen binding sites) specifically complementary to the shape of the antigens of a specific allergen that the individual is sensitised to. In this instance, it is specific (adaptive). Why? Because mast cells will ONLY release histamine when a specific allergen that the organism is sensitised to binds to the IgE antibodies, which are in turn bound to the outer membrane of the mast cells.

Next point: mast cells release histamine during the inflammatory response to attract phagocytes to the infective area, resulting in the phagocytosis of non-self, pathogenic matter, to prevent the spread of infection. However, in allergic responses, the release of histamine by mast cells causes profound, emphatic and dramatic responses to the detected allergen, including constriction of airways, itchiness, swelling, excessive production of mucous, etc. So that's how you can have mast cells acting positively in one instance, and not so positively in the other. Again, depends on the situation itself.

Memory B-cells retain immunological memory of the antigenic markers of the specific pathogen that the individual is now actively immunised against. When the pathogen is encountered on a subsequent occasion, there is no need for clonal selection. That is, clonal expansion (involving the rapid proliferation of B cells which differentiate into memory and plasma B cells that secrete specific immunoglobulins) occurs at an earlier time than when the individual first encountered the pathogen, because of the delay in the time required for the surface antibodies of a SPECIFIC B-cell to bind to the complementary antigenic marker of a pathogen, to then actually activate that B-cell to rapidly proliferate. The presence of memory just really speeds up the process by which a higher concentration of antibodies (in terms of humoral immunity) are produced, to elicit a more emphatic, rapid response to that specific pathogen.

Hope this helped!