Hi Bad Student (I'm sure you're not so bad),
Conclusions are often ignored by many students and teachers, but that also makes it a great place to stand out in the exam. The main point of the conclusion is to summarise the writer's main contention (in half a sentence) and main techniques. That, to me, is very boring. You may consider also:
1) Assessing how effective the writer is towards different readers
2) Consider the writer's approach and commenting on whether they are generally rational or emotive
3) Comment on how 2 relates to 1
Remember that a conclusion doesn't have to be long to be effective; and never to slam the writer for being a "bad writer".
Hi Lala1911,
I also like the 70/30 ratio for discussion/evidence. I also intertwine discussion of the context into my presentation of the evidence.
However, examiners do seem to be getting more lenient in this respect. Students who write 50/50 have also been getting high marks. Of course, they have also excelled in other areas of their writing and most likely have presented ideas relating to the context quite aptly within their presentation of the evidence.
It's hard for me to say whether the 50/50 ratio works for you unless I see your writing.
All the best to you both,
Yang
P.S. I will be running a
practice exam with immediate feedback on the
11th of October at Hawthorn Secondary College from
5pm to 8pm. The
first 5 applicants will receive a free copy of our writing guide. Our context essay guide will also be available for purchase for $15 each. The exam and feedback itself will cost
$45. Feedback is emailed to you over the weekend and essays can be collected the Friday after. You can email me
[email protected] 