Hey all, some great questions here.
whichkim:
Usually, it is sufficient in an imaginative piece to relate the themes presented to the context, and by extension, the text associated with it. In your case, it is Identity and Belonging (easiest context in my opinion). Different teachers may have different ideas in relation to this however, so check with your class teacher when attempting this in a SAC.
Alwin:
It's always a good sign when a student asks how to get those 9 and 10s haha. I would say the main factors that make a student stand out would be the following, in the order of importance (although they are inter-dependent):
1) Complex ideas
2) Control of language (clear and concise)
3) Precise and varied vocabulary
4) Presentation
dpagan:
TQA is a very interesting text. I personally feel that there are some similarities between TQA and Syria, although such an assertion in an essay may be politically sensitive in nature, and thus should be avoided. It is alleged that America is a big power-broker in the Syrian civil war, as they politically back the rebels and provide them with weapons, ammo and other resources. One can contend that either for the expansion of their influence, or the political leverage of a foreign conflict, the USA has committed, caused, or encouraged what would be considered crimes under international human rights law. The same controversy occurred in the Vietnam war, where both sides (Viet Cong and South Vietnam - backed by the US) committed crimes against humanity. You can find many resources on the subject if you dig around.
adam11095:
I think that if a model works well for you, it is a good model. Personally, I too "sprinkle" bits of close analysis in my English essays, although I usually avoid doing so at the end of my paragraphs. This is to avoid sounding like I am in the middle of my explanation at the end of the paragraph. However, if the end is a simple point that is a natural result of any previous discussion, it wouldn't matter.
All the best,
Yang