Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

November 01, 2025, 12:59:41 pm

Author Topic: Is this the correct way to describe how catalysts change the rate of a reaction?  (Read 1124 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

CossieG

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 202
  • Respect: +14
  • School Grad Year: 2013
A catalyst provides an alternative reaction pathway. It lowers the energy needed. By lowering it, more atoms have energy greater than the activation energy, and more collisions have greater energy than the activation energy, which increases the number of successful collisions and thus speeds up the reaction.
2013: English | Math Methods | Chemistry | Physics | Psychology |
2014 - 2017: Bachelor of Science at UoM (Computing and Software Systems)

Quote from: Tupac Shakur
The only thing that comes to a sleeping man is dreams.

Alwin

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 838
  • Respect: +241
A catalyst provides an alternative reaction pathway. It lowers the energy needed. By lowering it, more atoms have energy greater than the activation energy, and more collisions have greater energy than the activation energy, which increases the number of successful collisions and thus speeds up the reaction.

Seems solid enough, but you should remember to refer to time, increases the number of successful collisions in a given period of time.
eg 2 million collisions is certain greater than 1 collision, but what if the 2 million collisions were over 2 million years and the 1 collision was every second? (don't mean to make you feel bad, but examiners are picky like this)

My generic response would have been maybe something like this:

~ A catalyst provides an alternate reaction pathway with lower activation energy
~ Thus a greater proportion of particles have energy greater than the activation energy, Ea
~ Hence there is a greater proportion of collision are fruitful meaning a greater frequency of fruitful collisions
~ Therefore the rate of reaction increases

:)
2012:  Methods [48] Physics [49]
2013:  English [40] (oops) Chemistry [46] Spesh [42] Indo SL [34] Uni Maths: Melb UMEP [4.5] Monash MUEP [just for a bit of fun]
2014:  BAeroEng/BComm

A pessimist says a glass is half empty, an optimist says a glass is half full.
An engineer says the glass has a safety factor of 2.0

lzxnl

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 3432
  • Respect: +215
I wouldn't have even said alternate reaction pathway.

I'd just say that the catalyst bonds to the reactants, weakening the bonds and thus reducing the activation energy of the reaction. Blah.

2012
Mathematical Methods (50) Chinese SL (45~52)

2013
English Language (50) Chemistry (50) Specialist Mathematics (49~54.9) Physics (49) UMEP Physics (96%) ATAR 99.95

2014-2016: University of Melbourne, Bachelor of Science, Diploma in Mathematical Sciences (Applied Maths)

2017-2018: Master of Science (Applied Mathematics)

2019-2024: PhD, MIT (Applied Mathematics)

Accepting students for VCE tutoring in Maths Methods, Specialist Maths and Physics! (and university maths/physics too) PM for more details

Alwin

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 838
  • Respect: +241
I wouldn't have even said alternate reaction pathway.

I'd just say that the catalyst bonds to the reactants, weakening the bonds and thus reducing the activation energy of the reaction. Blah.

We're allowed to make reference to intermediate bonds in VCE chem?

Asked my teacher way back and said it wasn't strictly on the course, only (intramolecular:) Ionic, covalent, polar covalent and metallic (though the crystalline structure is off the course) and (intermolecular:) dipoles, hydrogen, ionic and dispersion forces
At least that's what I think he said :P
2012:  Methods [48] Physics [49]
2013:  English [40] (oops) Chemistry [46] Spesh [42] Indo SL [34] Uni Maths: Melb UMEP [4.5] Monash MUEP [just for a bit of fun]
2014:  BAeroEng/BComm

A pessimist says a glass is half empty, an optimist says a glass is half full.
An engineer says the glass has a safety factor of 2.0

Edward21

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 625
  • Don't ask me, all I do is calculate pH.
  • Respect: +27
Seems solid enough, but you should remember to refer to time, increases the number of successful collisions in a given period of time.
eg 2 million collisions is certain greater than 1 collision, but what if the 2 million collisions were over 2 million years and the 1 collision was every second? (don't mean to make you feel bad, but examiners are picky like this)

My generic response would have been maybe something like this:

~ A catalyst provides an alternate reaction pathway with lower activation energy
~ Thus a greater proportion of particles have energy greater than the activation energy, Ea
~ Hence there is a greater proportion of collision are fruitful meaning a greater frequency of fruitful collisions
~ Therefore the rate of reaction increases

:)
When I read the question at the top, I said all these steps you stated almost word for word in my head before I came to your post!!
2012 Biology [44] 2013 Chemistry [50] Italian [38] English [48] Health & HD [45] Methods [34] ATAR: 99.10

2014-2016 Bachelor of Biomedicine - The University of Melbourne


Alwin

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 838
  • Respect: +241
When I read the question at the top, I said all these steps you stated almost word for word in my head before I came to your post!!

You know that they say, Great minds... like to quote silly overly clichéd sentences ;)
2012:  Methods [48] Physics [49]
2013:  English [40] (oops) Chemistry [46] Spesh [42] Indo SL [34] Uni Maths: Melb UMEP [4.5] Monash MUEP [just for a bit of fun]
2014:  BAeroEng/BComm

A pessimist says a glass is half empty, an optimist says a glass is half full.
An engineer says the glass has a safety factor of 2.0