Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

October 07, 2025, 03:45:33 am

Author Topic: Collisions  (Read 764 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

joey7

  • Victorian
  • Forum Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 74
  • Respect: 0
  • School: Notre Dame College Shepparton
  • School Grad Year: 2013
Collisions
« on: October 29, 2013, 06:19:30 pm »
0
Came across this question in a Trial Exam

There are two collisions:

In collision 1: Car A of mass 1100 kg travelling at 20ms^-1 collides head on with another identical car travelling at 20ms^-1 in the opp. direction
In collision 2: Car A of mass 1100 kg travelling at 40ms^-1 crashes into a solid wall
In both collisions Car A comes to rest in 0.2 seconds

Which collision would cause car A to suffer more damage?

Answer confused me abit appreciate if someone could explain it

Stevensmay

  • Guest
Re: Collisions
« Reply #1 on: October 29, 2013, 06:31:11 pm »
+1
I did this question using impulse.

Collision 1.


Collision 1.


Which suggests that collision two will be worse.

Better way to do it

Collision one.




Collision two.




So again collision two will be worse.
« Last Edit: October 29, 2013, 06:37:39 pm by Stevensmay »

Alwin

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 838
  • Respect: +241
Re: Collisions
« Reply #2 on: October 29, 2013, 06:32:49 pm »
+1
I would've thought the amount of 'damage' would be identical in both collisions, assuming that damage is related to the amount of force acting on the car.

er no, sorry socialrhubarb. for the first collision, the force acts on BOTH cars so then they each experience a collision at 20ms^-1 with a solid inanimate surface (wall)

now since I ain't no nliu with all the technical jargo, I found a nice video for you :D

http://dsc.discovery.com/tv-shows/mythbusters/videos/mythssion-control.htm
2012:  Methods [48] Physics [49]
2013:  English [40] (oops) Chemistry [46] Spesh [42] Indo SL [34] Uni Maths: Melb UMEP [4.5] Monash MUEP [just for a bit of fun]
2014:  BAeroEng/BComm

A pessimist says a glass is half empty, an optimist says a glass is half full.
An engineer says the glass has a safety factor of 2.0