Further Exam 2 - How did everyone go?

[m2271m]

Is there consequential marks awarded in further?

[decentxion]

Hi I was wondering if someone could help me with this.

In the Graphs and Relations Module, when the question said to "Show the points that satisfy the Inequalities", do you think that shading the region is sufficient?
That's what I did and I'm quite worried that I had to mark all the discrete points within the feasible region.

[Evan.T]

Just re did the question from my calc, you get 9.7 if you interpreted it as if he throws the 2nd javelin from where the 1st one landed. You get 78. something (what i got) if you did it where he throws 2 javelins from the same spot. Cant remember the exact wording of the question so i don't know, but pretty sure in javelin they throw it from the one spot but i don't know i'm done with maths

The bearing of 125 given was from where the second javelin landed.

[b_blah]

In the Graphs and Relations Module, when the question said to "Show the points that satisfy the Inequalities", do you think that shading the region is sufficient?

This is what I did as well, including labelling the actual feasible region. Would like some clarification/ answers from others

[Shandbagers]

This is what itute says:
"Q4c The points in the triangular region enclosed by lines y=10, 6x+4y=48 and y=2x inclusive"
I think the discrete points had to be identified

[Yacoubb]

This is what itute says:
"Q4c The points in the triangular region enclosed by lines y=10, 6x+4y=48 and y=2x inclusive"
I think the discrete points had to be identified

I shaded the region, then did a little key & said all points in the feasible region (boundaries included).

[decentxion]

I did include a key just saying "Feasible region"...
I hope that's enough as it technically means all points in the feasible region, boundaries included as they are all solid lines.

[darvers]

Can any one please help me out!

Sacs: (95/100) - probably rank 1 out of strong cohort (hard sacs)
Exam 1: 40/40
Exam 2 59/60

Any possibility of still getting a 50??

[Yacoubb]

Can any one please help me out!

Sacs: (95/100) - probably rank 1 out of strong cohort (hard sacs)
Exam 1: 40/40
Exam 2 59/60

Any possibility of still getting a 50??

Definitely! 

[decentxion]

Definitely! 

Really? I was led to believe any mark lost in the exam results in a definite non-50...

[vaultericon]

Hey, sorry to be yet another asking for their predicted score, just would like a bit of reassurance after today's exam:

SACs: 100% (rank 1)
Exam 1: 40/40
Exam 2:55/60 (pending consequential marks due to error in graphs on my part)

I would really appreciate any ideas! Thanks guys!

[Huntyy]

Hey, sorry to be yet another asking for their predicted score, just would like a bit of reassurance after today's exam:

SACs: 100% (rank 1)
Exam 1: 40/40
Exam 2:55/60 (pending consequential marks due to error in graphs on my part)

I would really appreciate any ideas! Thanks guys!

45/46 give or take.

[ali352]

Guys please! 94 all year ranked 2nd in a strong to medium cohort. Got 31 or 30 out of 40 and got I think 48 study score ?

[whitty]

Are there any solutions to exam 2 up anywhere yet?

[Yacoubb]

Rank 1:
38/40 exam 1
59/60 exam 2

What score am I looking at?