I am trying to, but I always get about 70% of the logical reasoning incorrect. I ALWAYS get down to two answers, but cannot distinguish between the two, that is, I don't know the difference between 'Greg understands' and Greg acknowledges'.... fml.
As a general comment to all those complaining about the UMAT, I once thought all that stuff they test for was pretty useless too.
I guess having had a bit of experience, I can see the merits of the three section types now. Section 1 relevance is fairly self-explanatory. Section 2 stuff, that most people really dislike, is really what we deal with in our psych rotations, whereby slightly different connotations (unhappy vs low mod vs sad vs depressed vs suicidal -all these sliding scales are of up-most importance) can lead to different paths of diagnostic and clinical thinking. Pattern-recognition in Section 3 is a vital skill for physical examination, pathology and radiology (to name a few!). Sure, you won't be "picking the middle" looking at a rash, but the core skills are more relevant than you think.
Complain about it if it helps you sleep well at night, but don't dismiss it as completely irrelevant

Also can't get on section zero so I'm just gonna have to trust my instincts on the day ahah
If you paid for a service, you should tell someone when you can't get on. I'm not involved, but maybe this thread will help?
2 things.....