Hey guys!
Would my response to this question "Explain how a catalyst increase the rate of this reaction" by correct?
I know VCAA are quite specific.
"By providing an alternative reaction pathway with a lower activation energy, meaning that more particles have sufficient energy to overcome this new activation energy and thus collide more frequently and successfully and thus increase the rate of reaction"
Thank you!!
I think you've rambled a bit much. I reckon that if you had just stated the molecules have sufficient energy to overcome the barrier, you would've been fine - the rambling with collision theory isn't necesarrily wrong, however it's a bad habit to have in chemistry. Too often, I see students rambling, trying their best to say everything they need to to get the marks, and then they say something that IS wrong or irrelevant, and lose marks as a result. How many marks is it worth? Remember, you usually only need to say one thing per mark.
Oops, sorry, missed your second one.

You should use the edit function next time!
another question sorry!
What level of detail do we need to know about DNA? like do we need to know about the 3' to 5' and that they are semi-conservative? Also, do we need to know about DNA replication?
Thank you

I don't know what semi-conservative means OR anything about DNA replication, so probably not.

The study design only specifically mentions the primary and secondary structures of DNA (primary=sugar-phosphone ester backbone, with four base pairs running along it, made by covalent bonds, secondary=hydrogen bonding between base pairs), as well as the reactions that make them (i.e., condensation reactions. This is the same for all biomolecules you've learned about, btw). Anything else is too much biology for VCAA's liking.
