Ok alright now that I've gotten over that derp, riddle me this:
Question 31 on last year's VCAA exam:
After his stroke, a patient was unable to recognise his parents' faces although he could identify their voices. A scan of the patient's brain would most likely indicate damage to:
a) frontal lobe
b) parietal lobe
c) occipital lobe
d) temporal lobe
Answer on report: D, temporal lobe
Meanwhile, Oxford textbook:
If a person’s association cortex of the occipital lobe is damaged, it is unlikely to cause
blindness or a gap in the sight: however, the person is unlikely to be able to recogizise
things by sight. For example, when shown a picture of a dog, the person might say
it has four legs, big teeth and fur but is unable to recognise it as a dog. When people
with this type of damage are unable to recognise the faces of íàmiliar people but can
recognise them by the sound of their voice, they are said to have visual agnosia.
Am I being weird again, or is this contradictory.