Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

July 22, 2025, 12:27:19 am

Author Topic: UoM Maths Thread  (Read 31025 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Ballerina

  • well butter my bottom and call me a biscuit
  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 557
  • Riefe Sie dr Polizei!
  • Respect: +169
  • School: University of Melbourne
  • School Grad Year: 2015
Re: UoM Maths Thread
« Reply #135 on: June 09, 2014, 10:37:25 pm »
0
I am so happy I am not studying for your exams.

This is an excerpt from my statistics lecture: 'Remember, 0.05 is just the mathematical way of writing 5%.'


Ballerina

  • well butter my bottom and call me a biscuit
  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 557
  • Riefe Sie dr Polizei!
  • Respect: +169
  • School: University of Melbourne
  • School Grad Year: 2015
Re: UoM Maths Thread
« Reply #136 on: June 09, 2014, 10:43:11 pm »
+2
You are welcome for the free tutoring.

hobbitle

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1235
  • Respect: +110
Re: UoM Maths Thread
« Reply #137 on: June 09, 2014, 10:46:16 pm »
+2

use partial fractions to integrate: (x+13)/(x^3+2x^2-5x-6)
i can't work out how to factories the bottom polynomial.

Probably not the most efficient way but chances are they've given you something easily factorisable by hand... So just choose a couple of simple values of x (x=1,-1,2,-2) and see when the solution = 0. In this case if you sub in x=-1 you get 0 so (x+1) is a factor. Use polynomial long division and you'll end up with a factorisable quadratic.

2008 - 2010 | Bachelor of Production @ Victorian College of the Arts
2013 - 2015 | Bachelor of Science @ UoM (Bioengineering Systems)
2016 - 2017 | Master of Engineering (Biomedical) @ UoM

lzxnl

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 3432
  • Respect: +215
Re: UoM Maths Thread
« Reply #138 on: June 09, 2014, 10:59:46 pm »
+1
More specifically, if you have a polynomial with integer coefficients and the coefficient of the largest power of x is 1 (as it is here), any integer roots roots, or the x values that make the polynomial zero, must be factors of the constant term. So you only need to check +-1, +-2, +-3. This works in general. So if you had a -10 at the end, you wouldn't bother checking x=3, for instance.
2012
Mathematical Methods (50) Chinese SL (45~52)

2013
English Language (50) Chemistry (50) Specialist Mathematics (49~54.9) Physics (49) UMEP Physics (96%) ATAR 99.95

2014-2016: University of Melbourne, Bachelor of Science, Diploma in Mathematical Sciences (Applied Maths)

2017-2018: Master of Science (Applied Mathematics)

2019-2024: PhD, MIT (Applied Mathematics)

Accepting students for VCE tutoring in Maths Methods, Specialist Maths and Physics! (and university maths/physics too) PM for more details

Inside Out

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 514
  • Respect: +4
Re: UoM Maths Thread
« Reply #139 on: June 10, 2014, 01:07:50 am »
0
ok thanks guys :)

Captain Rascal

  • Victorian
  • Adventurer
  • *
  • Posts: 18
  • Kappa = Grey Face (no space)
  • Respect: 0
Re: UoM Maths Thread
« Reply #140 on: June 10, 2014, 04:03:27 pm »
+2
You are welcome for the free tutoring.

I've still got my econometrics exam coming up next week, which i haven't started studying for so i might need some of your tutoring haha :)

On the brighter side, I've finished my last practice exam for eng mathsssssssssssssss. Can go in tomorrow with confidence (and come out crying when i realise that mechanics is in 6 days)


Seacow

  • Victorian
  • Adventurer
  • *
  • Posts: 9
  • Respect: -2
Re: UoM Maths Thread
« Reply #141 on: June 12, 2014, 11:43:10 pm »
0
RPN Calculator Master Race

awyiisss

EDIT: http://commerce.hpcalc.org/34s.php Damn this looks good! Why can't there be a scientific RPN with solar to help maintain battery life! Hate using CR2032 batteries.
« Last Edit: June 13, 2014, 03:26:04 pm by Seacow »

Deleted User

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 578
  • Respect: +3
  • School: Xavier College
  • School Grad Year: 2013
Re: UoM Maths Thread
« Reply #142 on: August 21, 2014, 06:01:51 pm »
0
How do I compute the sum of j*1.05^(-j-1) from j=1 to 15? The answer is 70.1597 btw. Thanks

LOLs99

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1142
  • Respect: +7
Re: UoM Maths Thread
« Reply #143 on: August 21, 2014, 07:01:23 pm »
0
Can someone help me with this question?
Find the inverse by reducing to r.r.ef?

[-8 -3 -1; 4 2 1; -1 -1 1]

I can't seem to get the right answer   :(
2014-2016: 

2017-2018: Master of Engineering

kinslayer

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 761
  • Respect: +30
Re: UoM Maths Thread
« Reply #144 on: August 21, 2014, 08:03:37 pm »
0
How do I compute the sum of j*1.05^(-j-1) from j=1 to 15? The answer is 70.1597 btw. Thanks

Easiest way is to just compute all 15 terms and add  them. Computers ftw :D

If you really need a closed formula, you can take the formula for finite geometric series and differentiate to get the 'j' out the front.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geometric_progression

Deleted User

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 578
  • Respect: +3
  • School: Xavier College
  • School Grad Year: 2013
Re: UoM Maths Thread
« Reply #145 on: August 22, 2014, 08:09:28 pm »
0
Easiest way is to just compute all 15 terms and add  them. Computers ftw :D

If you really need a closed formula, you can take the formula for finite geometric series and differentiate to get the 'j' out the front.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geometric_progression

I differentiated the RHS of this equation:
http://upload.wikimedia.org/math/6/f/b/6fbd5a05358545c9be77e2b2afd1cd30.png
subbed in all the values, but I got 77 something, which isn't correct because the answer is 70 something.
« Last Edit: August 22, 2014, 08:11:46 pm by Deleted User »

LOLs99

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1142
  • Respect: +7
Re: UoM Maths Thread
« Reply #146 on: August 25, 2014, 10:02:00 pm »
0
[-8 -3 -1 | 1 0 0 ]
[ 4   2  1 | 0 1 0 ]
[-1 -1  1 | 0 0 1 ]

Reduce the left side to reduced row echelon form and the right side should be the inverse matrix

If you still need help, you know where to find me on Monday :)

Haha I just couldn't get the answer after all the row operations :(
I have been trying for 3 times and gave up.
2014-2016: 

2017-2018: Master of Engineering

lzxnl

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 3432
  • Respect: +215
Re: UoM Maths Thread
« Reply #147 on: August 25, 2014, 11:22:23 pm »
0
Haha I just couldn't get the answer after all the row operations :(
I have been trying for 3 times and gave up.

So, what you can do is add twice the second row to the first row to clear the top 8. Then, add four times the last row to the second row to clear the 4. Then swap rows 1 and 3. And finally multiply your new row 1 by -1. You'll have a 1 in the top left corner and everything else in the column will be zero. So, move your attention now to the second column. Try that.
2012
Mathematical Methods (50) Chinese SL (45~52)

2013
English Language (50) Chemistry (50) Specialist Mathematics (49~54.9) Physics (49) UMEP Physics (96%) ATAR 99.95

2014-2016: University of Melbourne, Bachelor of Science, Diploma in Mathematical Sciences (Applied Maths)

2017-2018: Master of Science (Applied Mathematics)

2019-2024: PhD, MIT (Applied Mathematics)

Accepting students for VCE tutoring in Maths Methods, Specialist Maths and Physics! (and university maths/physics too) PM for more details

notveryasian

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 486
  • Respect: +33
Re: UoM Maths Thread
« Reply #148 on: August 26, 2014, 01:54:50 am »
0
Haha I just couldn't get the answer after all the row operations :(
I have been trying for 3 times and gave up.

I recommend going through each row operation carefully when you start doing row reduction. After some practice you'll be able to apply the operations more quickly and develop good techniques to dealing with uglier matrices.

Also, keep trying. A lot of the time you won't get the answer on the first go since one mistake puts your entire answer off, but with perseverence and practice a lot of things in linear algebra become MUCH easier.
2014-2017: Bcom (Economics/Finance), Dip Maths (Discrete Maths and Operations Research) at Unimelb

LOLs99

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1142
  • Respect: +7
Re: UoM Maths Thread
« Reply #149 on: August 26, 2014, 09:01:53 pm »
0
Thanks for the helping out :)
2014-2016: 

2017-2018: Master of Engineering