In truth, I have a bit more respect for the LNP. They've clearly prioritised the economy over their own popularity.
I'm not sure how having an austere budget would be good for our economy or is in any way needed, let alone an austere budget that also attempts to raise revenues in really insensible ways (increasing the top marginal tax rate by 2%, but not closing tax loopholes and thereby allowing tax minimisation schemes to continue?)
Also to anyone here supporting dereg: Contrary to popular belief,
our fees are already one of the highest in the world. They will now likely rise to the highest in the world for courses like medicine, law and commerce. The most conservative estimates speak of a 25% fee increase for most courses, and so you can imagine those ones will go up by even more. (A large part of that estimate would only be the part necessitated by the government cutting
their end of the deal by 20%). HECS is nice, but a lot of OECD (developed) countries out there have far better schemes, especially now that indexation will be to 10 year government bonds rather than CPI.
Our economy is the world's envy in many ways. It definitely does not need an austere budget right now. It is true that deficits grew considerably under Labor, but our overall debt position is comfortable enough that we can let them slowly wind down each fiscal year, rather than enter into an emergency austere budget.
On the other hand though, the burden placed on university students here is amongst the heaviest developed world's heaviest. So to have an austere budget that we don't need, what we are doing is placing an even heavier burden on students ... right.
I read somewhere about currently enrolled students not being affected financially by fee deregulation, is this true? If so, does being on intermission and soon-to-be enrolled to another course count as being enrolled?
Yeah, you're safe. As long as you accepted and deferred before budget day.