Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

April 28, 2026, 06:09:59 am

Author Topic: Identity and Belonging - [The Mind of a Thief] | Critique  (Read 4500 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

clıppy

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 707
  • Would you like help?
  • Respect: +68
  • School Grad Year: 2014
Identity and Belonging - [The Mind of a Thief] | Critique
« on: August 05, 2014, 08:46:55 pm »
0
This is my first real crack at writing an expository essay (or something like an expository) and I'm looking for people to tear it apart and provide some feedback, it would be a huge help.
Without connection to others there is no me

Connection to others – it’s a basic human need. It has its roots buried deep within us, from the primal instinct of safety being in numbers. Yet its effects are far more profound than that. For many, an individual’s sense of self can be moulded and shaped from the connections they have to others. It is these connections and interactions that create the person – the individual. Psychologist Abraham Maslow believed belonging and connection to others to be part of a “hierarchy of needs” – things that a person must sequentially achieve to be content with themselves. So if belonging and connection are indeed necessary for humans, is it so farfetched to believe that those same connections can influence the individual?

Maslow’s idea resonates with me personally as in my own life, ideals and beliefs that I align with are the result of the connections I have made with others – ultimately creating the individual I am today. As a simplistic example, the pride I have for my country does not lie with my birth land of Australia, but rather for the land my parents came from, Poland. This should not make sense for if my life were immediately analysed from birth, I would have no connection to any place or person from Poland – and yet, I do. Through the upbringing from my immigrant parents, I now feel a true and honest connection to Poland. The ideals and customs brought by them and placed unto me since birth inevitably brought me to this end result. It was speaking Polish at home, rather than English. It was attending Catholic Church every Sunday. It was the traditions around Easter, that a traditional Polish egg soup called “Zurek” be eaten post-mass, and on Christmas Eve where a large feast of anything but meat was to be eaten before mass. These traditions that my parents were brought up with, that I was brought up with, eventually helped solidify my Polish identity. I have no nationalistic pride for Australia; it is all aimed at Poland – for I am Polish. An integral part of who I believe I am – the result of my connection to my parents.

Others similar to me can also attest to Maslow’s ideas and hence the notion that identity is the product of connection.  Patti Miller’s memoir “The Mind of a Thief” follows the story of herself and through her process, several Aboriginals as they attempt to find, understand and reconcile connections with who they are. Williams is a proud member of the Wiradjuri tribe, so much so that she is attempting to fight for her tribes’ right to the land wrongfully taken from them by the government. For someone such as Williams to have the tenacity to fight for their tribe – it is clear that this connection is an important part of her. Her relationship to her tribe, whilst being a factor that undoubtedly affects who she is, is not as prominent as the relationship she has with her mother. Williams states that being “Wiradjuri or not” is “passed down on the mother’s side” – being Wiradjuri, something that is an essential part of Williams is the result of her mother. It is from the connection that Williams has with her mother on a physiological level that has created a part of Williams that is ingrained within her – something so strong that she fights for it.

As it can be seen, the connections and relationships experienced by individuals can impact an individual’s sense of self. However, let us consider for a moment someone who in Maslow’s hierarchy has not yet been able to reach the platform where relationships can blossom. In the first two platforms of his hierarchy, Maslow believes that the physical well-being of a person and their safety must be taken care of (sequentially) before any type of ‘belonging’ can occur.

Genie was a child found by child welfare authorities in the 1970s after spending 12 years locked in a room, alone, and severely malnourished. By Maslow’s standards Genie was not able to fulfil the first two stages of his pyramid and thus, unable to achieve any type of meaningful connection – this of course added to her severe abuse, neglect and social isolation. For Genie, someone with no connections or interactions – can she have an identity? Does she have beliefs or aspects of society that she can identify with? On a basic level, can she even comprehend the ideas of following a particular sports team? Upon her rescue and placement into a hospital it was said that Genie “showed no signs of attachment to anybody in particular” – further agreeing with her non-existent connections.

However, as time progressed and researchers studied and interacted with Genie, she was able to form connections with others as her first two needs were met and so, she was able to progress further up the pyramid. She was able to form a bond with her mother, with Susan Curtiss (a lead researcher) and Marilyn Rigler, one of her foster caretakers. Genie found places where she belonged, such as her second foster home – a place she regarded so highly that upon subsequent lower quality foster homes she communicated with her non-existent skills “I want live back Marilyn house”. Genie was able to form an identity. Considering Maslow’s standards, Genie reached a point where she was able to connect to others, and maintain these relationships. It is only after these connections that some form of identity was able to be created. Prior to her connections she was in essence, nothing and no-one.
The SBS television program “Who do you think you are” also explores these ideas of identity and connection by having celebrities explore their family histories. Musician, John Butler, attempted to find out more about his past and where he came from. In his search, Butler found out that the Dobro guitar given to him by his father was passed down through the generations from his great grandmother. Butler sees his Dobro guitar as something that “helped define his career” and it is the product of his family connection. A defining part of who Butler is, as a person and a musician, is the result of the connections with his family on a physiological level.

Similar to Williams from “The Mind of a Thief”, Butler comes to find out that his name “comes from the female side” of his family as his great-great-grandfather took his Mother’s maiden name. Through familial ties – a connection spanning several generations – something that is a part of John Butler is yet again, the result of his connections to others. It is who he is, who he is known as, part of his band and world, and it all comes from his family.

Connections to others are not always clear. They may be current such as family and friends. They may be distant going through different generations and worlds. Sometimes, they may not even exist. However, given the opportunity, the connections that we experience and interact with inevitably lead us on a course of who we are, and who we are to become. As is the saying “show me your friends and I will tell you who you are”, too true is it that who we are is influenced by those around us.
2013 : VCE
2014 : VCE
2015 : UoM


Putting this here so I don't forget about it: http://www.codecogs.com/latex/eqneditor.php

Tutoring in Chemistry. PM if interested.

brenden

  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 7185
  • Respect: +2593
Re: Identity and Belonging - [The Mind of a Thief] | Critique
« Reply #1 on: August 10, 2014, 10:39:19 am »
+3
Disclaimer to everyone else: take anything I say with a grain of salt, VCE expository is not my forte.
This is my first real crack at writing an expository essay (or something like an expository) and I'm looking for people to tear it apart and provide some feedback, it would be a huge help.
Without connection to others there is no me

Connection to others – it’s a basic human need. Not digging this first sentence at all to be honest. Like, I'm reading this in your voice if you'd downed a couple of brewskis and you were trying to impart knowledge onto a younger cousin. I can even see you lean forward for "it's a basic human need". I don't like the dash in the first sentence, the first sentence should be something awesome imo. Either somethign thought-provoking or an attention grab. A short, bold statement might be the way to grab the attentino, but I feel like this sentence is just short, but not bold, because it's just laying out some simple, universally accepted statement. It has its roots buried deep within us, from the primal instinct of safety being in numbers. Yet its effects are far more profound than that.okay, cool, that's something more interesting For many, an individual’s sense of self can be moulded and shaped from the connections they have to others. It is these connections and interactions that create the person – the individual. Psychologist Abraham Maslow believed belonging and connection to others to be part of a “hierarchy of needs” – things that a person must sequentially achieve to be content with themselves.I can only imagine that 80% of students are going to bring up Maslow. I don't even read expository essays, ever, and I  was sick of reading Maslow before I started this essay. Find something cool. Make up a species of insect made up of tiny little insects, but they all connect their bodies to a bigger insect, and if one of the little insects splits itself from the big insect, the insect dies. That'd be a cool analogy. Give it a nice latin name, say it's in a remote jungle. Bam. Nah. Maybe, maybe not, but if it were my essay, I'd find something other than Maslow. So if belonging and connection are indeed necessary for humans, is it so farfetched to believe that those same connections can influence the individual?

Maslow’s idea resonates with me personally as in my own life, ideals and beliefs that I align with are the result of the connections I have made with others – ultimately creating the individual I am today. As a simplistic example, the pride I have for my country does not lie with my birth land of Australia, but rather for the land my parents came from, Poland. This should not make sense for if my life were immediately analysed from birth, I would have no connection to any place or person from Poland – and yet, I do. Through the upbringing from my immigrant parents, I now feel a true and honest connection to Poland. The ideals and customs brought by them and placed unto me since birth inevitably brought me to this end result. It was speaking Polish at home, rather than English. It was attending Catholic Church every Sunday. It was the traditions around Easter, that a traditional Polish egg soup called “Zurek” be eaten post-mass, and on Christmas Eve where a large feast of anything but meat was to be eaten before mass. These traditions that my parents were brought up with, that I was brought up with, eventually helped solidify my Polish identity. I have no nationalistic pride for Australia fuk off m8 we dunt tolarate ur kind arond here; it is all aimed at Poland – for I am Polish. An integral part of who I believe I am – the result of my connection to my parents. I actually feel like this is a pretty cool example/paragraph. There are a few expression flaws, commas needed in places and stuff like that to make it perfect, but nothing big. I feel like after the example would be a good opportunity to go on some philosophical bs about how your identity is simply removed from your body or any physical, tangible thing; rather, your identity is so abstractly intertwined with Poland and polish culture, then that's what defines you, such that if you took that away from your body, your identity would cease to exist. Like your body is a shell for something bigger than you. Some collective, cultural identity or some bs. I don't really know what I'm talking about, but it just "feels" like this paragraph can have a little bit more, because the example has been provided and shown well, and so I feel like the paragraph has more potential than to just be "paragraph = example, move on..", you know? That's all the feedback I can really give you, I "feel" like it needs something more and a bit more in the abstract to complement the "here's an example" nature of the paragraph.

Others similar to me can also attest to Maslow’s ideas and hence the notion that identity is the product of connection. Yeah, reading "Maslow's ideas", I just want to die. What about grass? That's cool. Without connection to other grass, there is no grass. Think about it. Is one blade of grass considered grass? No way. It's just a green thing. What about two blades? Well, I dunno. But looking at my backyard right now, there's definitely a tonne of grass. But that's because the individual blades are connected to each other to form one identity: grass. Idk what you could do with that in an essay... probably nothing, but I'm just trying to bring up the idea that there can be cool, abstract things that are removed from the norm. What about the thread in a sock? Or a nice coat? Maybe humanity is like a really nice, designer coat with a really high thread count, where the threads are individuals. Patti Miller’s memoir “The Mind of a Thief” follows the story of herself and through her processwhat process? , several Aboriginals as they attempt to find as they attempt to find what? this sentence needs revision., understand and reconcile connections with who they are. Williams is a proud member of the Wiradjuri tribe, so much so that she is attempting to fight for her tribes’ the apostrophe needs to be before the s in this case, because it's just one tribe (hers)right to the land wrongfully taken from them by the government. For someone such as Williams to have the tenacity to fight for their tribe – it is clear that this connection is an important part of her. Her relationship to her tribe, whilst being a factor that undoubtedly affects who she is, is not as prominent as the relationship she has with her mother. Williams states that being “Wiradjuri or not” is “passed down on the mother’s side” – being Wiradjuri, something that is an essential part of Williams is the result of her mother. It is from the connection that Williams has with her mother on a physiological level that has created a part of Williams that is ingrained within her – something so strong that she fights for it.yeah i feel like the paragraphs so far are simply extended examples, like there needs to be something a little ~more~

As it can be seen, the connections and relationships experienced by individuals can impact an individual’s sense of self. However, let us consider for a moment someone who in Maslow’s hierarchy has not yet been able to reach the platform where relationships can blossom. In the first two platforms of his hierarchy, Maslow believes that the physical well-being of a person and their safety must be taken care of (sequentially) before any type of ‘belonging’ can occur.  You know what I'm gonna say.

Genie was a child found by child welfare authorities in the 1970s after spending 12 years locked in a room, alone, and severely malnourished. i think the change of voice in this paragaph, it breaks the flow a bit in a good way and keeps things interestingBy Maslow’s standards Genie was not able to fulfil the first two stages of his pyramid and thus, unable to achieve any type of meaningful connection – this of course added to her severe abuse, neglect and social isolation. For Genie, someone with no connections or interactions – can she have an identity? Does she have beliefs or aspects of society that she can identify with? On a basic level, can she even comprehend the ideas of following a particular sports team? Upon her rescue and placement into a hospital it was said that Genie “showed no signs of attachment to anybody in particular” – further agreeing with her non-existent connections. I feel tlike there are a lot of holes in this paragraph just in terms of the argument. I'm not sure if this is an issue but, for one, who's to say that Maslow is correct? The idea that someone can't connect if they're not physically cool sounds immediately wrong. What about people in poverty who have a big sense of community? Moreover, if she's locked in a room, what is she supposed to connect with? The idea that she shows no signs of attach,ment doesn't means she can't, or that she doesn't have a sense of identity.. that she has no connnections is pretty well explained by there being a lack of availability. Moreover, it's sketchy that she needs to have beliefs about society for her to have a sense of self. I'm nto saying she has a definitive identity... she may, she may not... but maybe it's possible to have one without having beliefs about society. Maybe it' snot - but that's perhaps something you'd like to "expose" and talk about... can we have identitiy without society?

However, as time progressed and researchers studied and interacted with Genie, she was able to form connections with others as her first two needs were met and so, she was able to progress further up the pyramid. or were her first needs met at the same time as she started to form connections coincidentally just because she wasn't locked in a room? The sketchy argument bothers me, i'm not sure if it w ould bother an examiner. The essay has a good sensenf of progression though, so far, even though I think there could be things that could be changed. She was able to form a bond with her mother, with Susan Curtiss (a lead researcher) and Marilyn Rigler, one of her foster caretakers. Genie found places where she belonged, such as her second foster home – a place she regarded so highly that upon subsequent lower quality foster homes she communicated with her non-existent skills “I want live back Marilyn house”. Genie was able to form an identity. Considering Maslow’s standards, Genie reached a point where she was able to connect to others, and maintain these relationships. It is only after these connections that some form of identity was able to be created. Prior to her connections she was in essence, nothing and no-one.Again, it just seems like an example and nothing 'more'.
The SBS television program “Who do you think you are” also explores these ideas of identity and connection by having celebrities explore their family histories. Musician, John Butler, attempted to find out more about his past and where he came from. In his search, Butler found out that the Dobro guitar given to him by his father was passed down through the generations from his great grandmother. Butler sees his Dobro guitar as something that “helped define his career” and it is the product of his family connection. A defining part of who Butler is, as a person and a musician, is the result of the connections with his family on a physiological level.

Similar to Williams from “The Mind of a Thief”, Butler comes to find out that his name “comes from the female side” of his family as his great-great-grandfather took his Mother’s maiden name. Through familial ties – a connection spanning several generations – something that is a part of John Butler is yet again, the result of his connections to others. It is who he is, who he is known as, part of his band and world, and it all comes from his family. this is a fresher example than maslow

Connections to others are not always clear. They may be current such as family and friends. They may be distant going through different generations and worlds. Sometimes, they may not even exist. However, given the opportunity, the connections that we experience and interact with inevitably lead us on a course of who we are, and who we are to become. As is the saying “show me your friends and I will tell you who you are”, too true is it that who we are is influenced by those around us. I like the conclusion, not too sure why. In general, I think you've got a decent progression through the essay and a nice breadth across the different things you pull up... butler, genie, maslow etc. I think though that it's essentailyl a series of examples supporting a particular point, whereas it might read better as a series of deep questions, followed by extensive thought about what might be the deep answers. That's just what I reckon. Again, I've written one expository essay in my life so not exactly my strong suit lol.
✌️just do what makes you happy ✌️

JackSonSmith

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 288
  • "Failure is part of nature, success is man-made"
  • Respect: +4
  • School Grad Year: 2015
Re: Identity and Belonging - [The Mind of a Thief] | Critique
« Reply #2 on: August 10, 2014, 12:24:39 pm »
0
I do not think you are supposed to use contractions in essays. (Maybe that's just what my teacher says).

I would give your conclusion a 9/10, it is really good.
« Last Edit: August 10, 2014, 12:38:26 pm by JackSonSmith »
2014: Psychology
2015: English | Methods | Chinese SL | Specialist | Physics 

2016: Bachelor of Commerce - The University of Melbourne

Start where you are. Use what you have.  Do what you can. – Arthur Ashe