Tone transitions of the first article: reflective tone of admiration. Opens in the second person "not as far as you might think", "if you live in Victoria" (analyse connotations of language and links between issue and proximity to the audience here).
Then at the 4th paragraph(?), the one about government incentives, the tone becomes a pragmatic, and slightly more cynical one "there needs to be more than" "huge amount of money" etc.
The second 'article' moved from a sarcastic tone, to a condemnatory tone and then concluded with a pragmatic tone.
I could rewrite my response if people are interested? Pretty sure I tore this language analysis to shreds, LA is always generally my strongest. Text on the other hand.....
ALSO: LANGUAGE ANALYSIS CONCLUSIONS ARE UNNECESSARY!!!! YOU DON'T HAVE AN ARGUMENT, what the hell are you concluding???