Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

May 27, 2026, 06:47:18 pm

Author Topic: Section C Discussion  (Read 66865 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

AmericanBeauty

  • Guest
Re: Section C Discussion
« Reply #105 on: October 29, 2014, 04:19:57 pm »
"Off this planet" I believe, I just included it as an example of Laikas' use of sarcasm. Did anyone feel there was just a lot of junk in there? Like the dove part and the 2 parts on the right of the first image?
no i neglected the dove and just said something like it is named after colombus so we have to live up to his name. manipulating articles woop

Edward Elric

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 282
Re: Section C Discussion
« Reply #106 on: October 29, 2014, 04:27:38 pm »
For the opinion piece : Space exploration should be considered funding from governments to ensure that we can all reap the benefits from it.

For the letter to the editor: We shouldn't be even thinking about space exploration before we solve current issues on Earth such as hunger and diseases.

I completely agree :)

quack

  • Victorian
  • Fresh Poster
  • *
  • Posts: 2
  • School: VUSC
Re: Section C Discussion
« Reply #107 on: October 29, 2014, 04:51:39 pm »
AM I THE ONLY ONE THAT LOVES SPACE AND WAS SO EXCITED TO SEE SPACE? IT was probably a shit article but I was so blinded by space, I get so emotionally involved and connected to these exploration things. Fuark. It was the best article for me, but it was so shit in terms of stuff to analyse the impact on the audience.

Haha, I was like that as well. I also felt kind of biased towards Yergo because of that.. (。♥‿♥。)

Epsilon

  • Victorian
  • Adventurer
  • *
  • Posts: 14
  • School: Maribyrnong Secondary College
Re: Section C Discussion
« Reply #108 on: October 29, 2014, 04:52:46 pm »
no i neglected the dove and just said something like it is named after colombus so we have to live up to his name. manipulating articles woop
I actually had no idea what the 'Dove' was referring to.

DanielJ

  • Victorian
  • Trailblazer
  • *
  • Posts: 45
  • School: Western Heights College
  • School Grad Year: 2014
Re: Section C Discussion
« Reply #109 on: October 29, 2014, 04:55:41 pm »
I actually had no idea what the 'Dove' was referring to.
This exactly. The last two paragraphs of the letter felt like he repeated the 2nd paragraph over and over too
2013: Physics 37-->39.6
2014: Specialists 39-->50.36
          Methods 42 -->46.83
          Further 46-->45.07
          Chemistry 36-->40.54
          English 30-->27.75

Lets ah.. never speak about english again?

ATAR of 95.00
DUX of Western Heights College 2014

AmericanBeauty

  • Guest
Re: Section C Discussion
« Reply #110 on: October 29, 2014, 04:56:08 pm »
I actually had no idea what the 'Dove' was referring to.

idk the guy was at Kolombus 21 and he asked whether the exhibition was named after colombus the explorer, and the guy said 'sort of but not really' as it was named after a 'dove' which is the international sign for peace or something along those lines. I didn't write any of that i don't know how i remember it.

doomdestroyer

  • Victorian
  • Forum Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 89
  • School: Emmaus College
  • School Grad Year: 2014
Re: Section C Discussion
« Reply #111 on: October 29, 2014, 04:57:24 pm »
I actually had no idea what the 'Dove' was referring to.

The dove is a symbol of piece meaning that Kolumbus-21 is all about space exploration on peaceful terms.

Epsilon

  • Victorian
  • Adventurer
  • *
  • Posts: 14
  • School: Maribyrnong Secondary College
Re: Section C Discussion
« Reply #112 on: October 29, 2014, 05:13:50 pm »
The dove is a symbol of piece meaning that Kolumbus-21 is all about space exploration on peaceful terms.
I got that bit. There was something about it being the name of a group. Unless that was the Kolumbus-21 group. Either way, it seemed a bit unnecessary and confusingly worded.
« Last Edit: October 29, 2014, 05:16:05 pm by Epsilon »

Yvetteismyhero

  • Victorian
  • Fresh Poster
  • *
  • Posts: 1
Re: Section C Discussion
« Reply #113 on: October 29, 2014, 05:18:15 pm »

sparked

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 207
Re: Section C Discussion
« Reply #114 on: October 29, 2014, 05:29:10 pm »
Tone transitions of the first article: reflective tone of admiration. Opens in the second person "not as far as you might think", "if you live in Victoria" (analyse connotations of language and links between issue and proximity to the audience here).

 Then at the 4th paragraph(?), the one about government incentives, the tone becomes a pragmatic, and slightly more cynical one "there needs to be more than" "huge amount of money" etc.

The second 'article' moved from a sarcastic tone, to a condemnatory tone and then concluded with a pragmatic tone.

I could rewrite my response if people are interested? Pretty sure I tore this language analysis to shreds, LA is always generally my strongest. Text on the other hand.....

ALSO: LANGUAGE ANALYSIS CONCLUSIONS ARE UNNECESSARY!!!! YOU DON'T HAVE AN ARGUMENT, what the hell are you concluding???
B. Bmed III UoM: Anatomy Major
ATAR: 99.55
English [50] - Studio Arts [49] - Biology [47]

https://sites.google.com/view/sparkedvce
^ $25p/h! Sparked VCE Biology Classes: Sat, Sun, Wed. 10 days left to sign up! (Includes full year notes!!!)

Achieve 50 in VCE English Headstart Lecture: https://goo.gl/forms/NPuCsLbh8dfKjMsb2

Edge_of_Chaos

  • Victorian
  • Adventurer
  • *
  • Posts: 8
  • School: :/
  • School Grad Year: 2014
Re: Section C Discussion
« Reply #115 on: October 29, 2014, 05:36:15 pm »
(Image removed from quote.)





Omg lol! Now I got Big M all over my bed!


@Sparked

I didn't even attempt a conclusion.  ::) #YOLO

AmericanBeauty

  • Guest
Re: Section C Discussion
« Reply #116 on: October 29, 2014, 05:59:30 pm »
Tone transitions of the first article: reflective tone of admiration. Opens in the second person "not as far as you might think", "if you live in Victoria" (analyse connotations of language and links between issue and proximity to the audience here).

 Then at the 4th paragraph(?), the one about government incentives, the tone becomes a pragmatic, and slightly more cynical one "there needs to be more than" "huge amount of money" etc.

The second 'article' moved from a sarcastic tone, to a condemnatory tone and then concluded with a pragmatic tone.

I could rewrite my response if people are interested? Pretty sure I tore this language analysis to shreds, LA is always generally my strongest. Text on the other hand.....

ALSO: LANGUAGE ANALYSIS CONCLUSIONS ARE UNNECESSARY!!!! YOU DON'T HAVE AN ARGUMENT, what the hell are you concluding???
I didn't see any of these tonal changes, and still don't. But i commend you, sir.

Valyria

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 210
  • School: John Monash Science School
  • School Grad Year: 2014
Re: Section C Discussion
« Reply #117 on: October 29, 2014, 06:01:02 pm »
I didn't see any of these tonal changes, and still don't. But i commend you, sir.

Seconded. Regardless, as long as you provide evidence and analysis I suppose you can justify yourself
2014 ATAR: [99.20]
VCE English positions have been booked out for 2015.
2015: BCom/LLB @ Monash University

sparked

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 207
Re: Section C Discussion
« Reply #118 on: October 29, 2014, 06:21:32 pm »
This is true! All about justification.

In writing "space exploration has been on my mind" the possessive "my" carries the reflective tone. Language such as participle "inspiring" etc. continues that.

The state as a whole doesn't generally pick tone super perceptively (as reflected by the Examiner's Reports) so do NOT stress. Regardless, out of everybody's hands now!
B. Bmed III UoM: Anatomy Major
ATAR: 99.55
English [50] - Studio Arts [49] - Biology [47]

https://sites.google.com/view/sparkedvce
^ $25p/h! Sparked VCE Biology Classes: Sat, Sun, Wed. 10 days left to sign up! (Includes full year notes!!!)

Achieve 50 in VCE English Headstart Lecture: https://goo.gl/forms/NPuCsLbh8dfKjMsb2

chuck981996

  • Victorian
  • Forum Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 85
  • School Grad Year: 2014
Re: Section C Discussion
« Reply #119 on: October 29, 2014, 06:41:42 pm »
I just think that people are overreacting. We have to remind ourselves of the requirements: did you analyse language? If so, great! 10 for you, Glen Coco.
2013: Mathematical Methods [47]
2014: English | Specialist Mathematics | Physics | Music Performance (Voice - Classical) | UMEP Mathematics