Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

November 04, 2025, 06:58:46 pm

Author Topic: Methods Exam 1: Discussion!  (Read 78423 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

GeniDoi

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 209
  • How can mirrors be real if our i's aren't real?
  • School: John Monash Science School
  • School Grad Year: 2015
Re: Methods Exam 1: Discussion!
« Reply #150 on: November 05, 2014, 01:37:12 pm »
Hey all,

regarding Question 1.b), I forgot to sub in 1 all together. It was a 3 mark question. How many marks will I lose if I differentiated correctly?

You would have lost 2 marks, one for correct substitution into the derivative and one for the answer.
[2014] Methods: 40
[2015 Aims] English [40+] - Specialist [40+] - Physics [43+] - Algorithmics [37?] - Psychology [32]
[2016-2019] BCommerce/BCompSci @ Monash Uni

chuck981996

  • Victorian
  • Forum Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 85
  • School Grad Year: 2014
Re: Methods Exam 1: Discussion!
« Reply #151 on: November 05, 2014, 01:41:55 pm »
Did anyone else get the correct answer for 10bi using Pythagorus rather than similar triangles?

Hypothetically you could have used Pythagorus' theorum… can you post what you did?
2013: Mathematical Methods [47]
2014: English | Specialist Mathematics | Physics | Music Performance (Voice - Classical) | UMEP Mathematics

someone011

  • Victorian
  • Trailblazer
  • *
  • Posts: 38
Re: Methods Exam 1: Discussion!
« Reply #152 on: November 05, 2014, 01:45:52 pm »
Hypothetically you could have used Pythagorus' theorum… can you post what you did?

I have no idea, I tried to work it out again but couldn't. I definitely got the same answer though.

keltingmeith

  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 5493
  • he/him - they is also fine
Re: Methods Exam 1: Discussion!
« Reply #153 on: November 05, 2014, 01:47:17 pm »
I have no idea, I tried to work it out again but couldn't. I definitely got the same answer though.

Presumably if you got the same answer, you're fine.

liamh96

  • Victorian
  • Trailblazer
  • *
  • Posts: 30
  • School: Kambrya
  • School Grad Year: 2014
Re: Methods Exam 1: Discussion!
« Reply #154 on: November 05, 2014, 01:48:29 pm »
Hi guys,

Would I score a method mark for 9.b.ii) for writing the formula to find the probability but not subbing in any values?
Aim: ATAR 92+

Knowing where to put your awareness is the highest form of intelligence. This is true wisdom.

chuck981996

  • Victorian
  • Forum Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 85
  • School Grad Year: 2014
Re: Methods Exam 1: Discussion!
« Reply #155 on: November 05, 2014, 01:49:51 pm »
Hi guys,

Would I score a method mark for 9.b.ii) for writing the formula to find the probability but not subbing in any values?

Yes.
2013: Mathematical Methods [47]
2014: English | Specialist Mathematics | Physics | Music Performance (Voice - Classical) | UMEP Mathematics

chuck981996

  • Victorian
  • Forum Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 85
  • School Grad Year: 2014
Re: Methods Exam 1: Discussion!
« Reply #156 on: November 05, 2014, 01:51:35 pm »
Presumably if you got the same answer, you're fine.

Not necessarily: remember that comment on the 2013 Specialist Maths Exam 1 report? "There were several cases where incorrect working fortuitously led to a correct answer. Students should be reminded that in such cases, the final answer mark will not be awarded if it is not supported by relevant and correct working."

Just curious: did you follow the sort of reasoning I show in the attached photo? (just the 1st step)
« Last Edit: November 05, 2014, 02:52:00 pm by chuck981996 »
2013: Mathematical Methods [47]
2014: English | Specialist Mathematics | Physics | Music Performance (Voice - Classical) | UMEP Mathematics

LFC_Kero

  • Victorian
  • Trailblazer
  • *
  • Posts: 29
Re: Methods Exam 1: Discussion!
« Reply #157 on: November 05, 2014, 01:52:45 pm »
I got 27/40

and 80+ % in all my SACS

is it still possible to get 35 raw study score?

Jnf17

  • Victorian
  • Adventurer
  • *
  • Posts: 21
  • School: Ballarat Grammar
Re: Methods Exam 1: Discussion!
« Reply #158 on: November 05, 2014, 01:54:53 pm »
Not necessarily: remember that supremely bitchy comment on the 2013 Specialist Maths Exam 1 report? "There were several cases where incorrect working fortuitously led to a correct answer. Students should be reminded that in such cases, the final answer mark will not be awarded if it is not supported by relevant and correct working."

Well there goes Q10bii... made a logical guess at 4 and therefore the area. Thought I'd still get an answer mark

evilpancakeman

  • Victorian
  • Fresh Poster
  • *
  • Posts: 1
  • School: Horsham
Re: Methods Exam 1: Discussion!
« Reply #159 on: November 05, 2014, 01:56:04 pm »
I can't believe it. Using the solutions that Chuck posted, I got about 13/40!

What do you think that will net me?

chuck981996

  • Victorian
  • Forum Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 85
  • School Grad Year: 2014
Re: Methods Exam 1: Discussion!
« Reply #160 on: November 05, 2014, 01:56:53 pm »
Well there goes Q10bii... made a logical guess at 4 and therefore the area. Thought I'd still get an answer mark

Have a look at the photo I posted, is it similar to what you did? I don't think what you did was wrong, per se, I just can't definitively say it was right until I understand what you did :P
2013: Mathematical Methods [47]
2014: English | Specialist Mathematics | Physics | Music Performance (Voice - Classical) | UMEP Mathematics

arose

  • Victorian
  • Adventurer
  • *
  • Posts: 8
Re: Methods Exam 1: Discussion!
« Reply #161 on: November 05, 2014, 01:57:57 pm »
Think I got 33/40, made silly mistakes but overall this exam was alright, required a bit more thinking than past exam 1s

yoyoball

  • Victorian
  • Trailblazer
  • *
  • Posts: 42
  • School Grad Year: 2014
Re: Methods Exam 1: Discussion!
« Reply #162 on: November 05, 2014, 01:58:37 pm »
I got 27/40

and 80+ % in all my SACS

is it still possible to get 35 raw study score?
It depends on how the rest of ur cohort did aswell. Say u go to a very competitive school abd everyone else aces the exam all ur sacs will get scaled aswell. And you also have exam two to go!! Theres still a possibility as long as u dont give up!!
2013: Biology:40
2014: Methods, Chemistry, Psychology, English language, Specialist

chuck981996

  • Victorian
  • Forum Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 85
  • School Grad Year: 2014
Re: Methods Exam 1: Discussion!
« Reply #163 on: November 05, 2014, 02:00:18 pm »
I can't believe it. Using the solutions that Chuck posted, I got about 13/40!

What do you think that will net me?

Are you sure you're counting all the method marks properly? If you did get 13, that's been pretty consistently in the middle of the D+ band, although last year it was at the top of the D range. Forget about it, relax, and focus on tomorrow :)
2013: Mathematical Methods [47]
2014: English | Specialist Mathematics | Physics | Music Performance (Voice - Classical) | UMEP Mathematics

Jnf17

  • Victorian
  • Adventurer
  • *
  • Posts: 21
  • School: Ballarat Grammar
Re: Methods Exam 1: Discussion!
« Reply #164 on: November 05, 2014, 02:01:16 pm »
Have a look at the photo I posted, is it similar to what you did? I don't think what you did was wrong, per se, I just can't definitively say it was right until I understand what you did :P

I wasn't the one who used Pythag Chuck :) Was just a random comment :)