Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

May 24, 2025, 06:05:15 pm

Author Topic: English Advanced Essay Marking (Modules Only)  (Read 688990 times)

0 Members and 12 Guests are viewing this topic.

jamonwindeyer

  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 10149
  • The lurker from the north.
Re: English Advanced Essay Marking (Modules Only)
« Reply #435 on: July 25, 2016, 12:21:31 am »
Hi there! If you have the time, I was wondering if you could have a look over my Module A essay and give me any tips on how I can improve. Last time I had it marked by my teacher (this was for an old assessment task) she gave me 16/20, meaning that this (along with my poetry essay which was also a 16/20 - once I've got enough posts I might upload that one for checking as well if that's okay) is one of my weakest areas, so I really need to give it a "leg up" for trials :)

Thank you so much!

PS. This was originally a speech, so there might be a few speech features that I have forgotten to get rid of, sorry!

Hey there Sudodds!  I'd be happy to have a look for you! ;D your essay is attached with comments in bold!

Spoiler
Question: The challenge of living your own life is an idea that connects Pride and Prejudice and Letter to Alice on First Reading Jane Austen. How is this idea shaped and reshaped in these texts from different contexts?

"In marrying your nephew, I should not consider myself as quitting that sphere. He is a gentleman; I am a gentleman's daughter; so far we are equal."

In a society bound by the constraints of class and gender restrictions, what chance did Elizabeth, the daughter of a struggling middle-class family, have in marrying, let alone achieving equality with the aristocratic Mr. Darcy? Though great for a speech, you need to go back to a more traditional Thesis here, a basic statement and amplification. The challenge of living within a society that suppresses your freedoms is key within Jane Austen’s novel Pride and Prejudice, and Fay Weldon’s epistolary non-fiction work Letter’s to Alice. This is better, you've slipped back into the appropriate style. Despite their different contexts, both challenge the status quo in regards to marriage, and how it impacts upon individual freedoms, through shaping and reshaping the key themes of class, gender and the rebellious character. Austen challenges her society through the actions and attitudes of her characters, particularly Elizabeth Bennet, while Weldon re-contextualises Austen’s critique in order to validate their desire for social change, and implore the reader to strive for the same. The rest of the intro is great!! I'd like to see a greater emphasis on comparison to suit the Module though ;D

Both Pride and Prejudice and Letters to Alice are connected through their critique of the role of class within society, and the challenges it creates within the lives of individuals. Be more specific; do they agree completely with each other or are there differences? Austen was writing during the Regency period, a time of strict social codes and structures, whereby an individual’s class – lower, middle or upper - greatly affected their ability to live their own life, creating boundaries in terms of occupation and income. “Lady Catherine … likes the distinction of rank preserved.” Try not to just place quotes into your essay without justification or explanation, link it specifically to one of your ideas! This is demonstrated within Pride and Prejudice through the lifestyles of the various classes; the simplicity of the gentry class such as the Bennets’ in comparison with the extravagance of aristocratic Lady Catherine De Bough’s.

Marriage was crucial within society, as through marriage the strict social hierarchy was maintained. However, through marriage these structures could also be subverted, as marriage provided the opportunity for social mobility and the betterment of one’s situation, particularly for women. Status and wealth were overwhelmingly the key concerns of marriage within Regency England. We are spending a little too long on contextual information and not enough time on analysis! In Letters to Alice, Weldon re-contextualises Austen’s perception of her society’s social stratification, giving her contemporary readers a more enlightened understanding of the text. How did Weldon do this? Through Weldon, it is clear that Austen was critical of her society’s views on marriage. According to Weldon, Mr. Darcy “Marry[ing] where he loved, not where he ought,” and the fact Elizabeth has nothing to offer Mr. Darcy but her “intelligence, vigour and honesty” demonstrates Austen seditiousness, going against the social conventions of her time by suggesting the superiority of a marriage based in love and personal connections rather than societal and economic necessity, as it allows for more individual happiness and freedom. We now have a quote, but still no techniques! Fiction, according to Weldon, enables readers with insight into the freedoms and rights they deserve, but are not afforded to them in reality. The reality for a woman within Elizabeth’s situation would have been Mr. Collins, however through Literature Austen suggests to the reader they deserve more. Good link to audience. Through Weldon’s reshaping of key themes within Pride and Prejudice, the reader is able to better recognise Austen’s aims, to expose the superficial and flawed nature of class divisions, and the triumph of personal traits such as intelligence over established class conventions, solidifying Austen as a subversive writer. While you do a lot with context here, which is great, you aren't analysing your text!

Both Pride and Prejudice and Letters to Alice are connected through their discussion of the role of women, and how that creates challenges within the lives of individuals. In order to understand the over-the-top attitude of Mrs. Bennet, one “must understand... the world in which Jane Austen was born.” Austen was writing within a patriarchal society, with her books “studded with [examples of] male whims taking priority … over female happiness.”  This is demonstrated within Pride and Prejudice through the fragility of the Bennets’ situation. Can you give me an example from the text?

During Austen’s time it was almost impossible for women to lead independent lives, with them at the mercy of male relatives for financial and social stability. For many families, marriage was increasingly important, as it enabled a family to maintain social security that may have been in jeopardy due to misogynistic inheritance laws. Austen represents this through the desperation of the Bennets’ situation, demonstrated by Mrs. Bennet making it “the business of her life to get her daughters married” before Mr. Bennet died, and her anger towards Elizabeth when she rejects Mr. Collins’ proposal, as their union would save their family from destitution. Can you give me quotes and techniques that support your argument?
Through the re-contextualisation of Austen though Letters to Alice, Weldon enables her contemporary audience to better understand the plight of women at the time. Weldon was writing within a society experiencing the impact of second-wave feminism. Women could now vote and take up work previously reserved for men, and though the “get in the kitchen” attitude was still prevalent, it was facing major opposition. Good contextual info Her society was not perfect, but it would be impossible to deny the significant progress made since Austen’s time, and the changes in the abilities of women to live independently. For her post-feminism audience to better understand the plight of women in Pride and Prejudice, Weldon utilises contextual detail and statistics to clarify the characters’ motives.  How? When, according to Weldon, only 30% of women were married, and one of the most popular alternatives was prostitution, Mrs. Bennet’s desperation definitely appears justified.

Through “linking the past of that society with its future,” and bridging the generational gap between the two contexts, Weldon instils empathy within her contemporary audience, and substantiates Austen’s writings as a subversive text, maintaining the role of Literature with a capital L as key in challenging the values and attitudes of society.

Both Pride and Prejudice and Letters to Alice are connected through their use of rebellious characters, challenging the beliefs of those around them in order to teach their readership of the importance of independence. Within Pride and Prejudice, this takes the form of Elizabeth Bennet, whom Austen utilises as her authorial mouthpiece to challenge her society’s values. Elizabeth does not accept the established conventions of her period, desiring for herself the freedom to decide her own life-path. This is evident through her rejection of Mr. Collins, whom she did not love despite their marriage being favourable by society’s standards. Are there any techniques that are used in the text that makes this evident, rather than just a plot element?  “Lizzy has something more of quickness than her sisters.” In Pride and Prejudice, Elizabeth’s subversiveness and intelligence is praised rather than discouraged, those qualities leading her to find freedom within a marriage that traditionally would not have been possible for someone of her situation. Retell (remember your marker has read your text!). Through Elizabeth’s action, attitudes and triumphs, Austen implores her readership to rebel also, as it will lead them to greater happiness. Good audience link. Weldon utilises the rebellious character Alice to teach her readership the importance of individual freedom. Despite Aunt Fay’s often inflexible advice on how to achieve success as a writer, Alice rebels against her Aunt’s guidance, and achieves overwhelming success on her own. To be a subversive writer, one must also be a subversive reader, and through Alice’s success, Weldon informs her readers that though they have just read her beliefs, it is critical that they form their own. Therefore, it is evident that through the use of subversive and rebellious characters, both Pride and Prejudice and Letters to Alice implore their readership to form their own values and attitudes independent from societal influence, and thus live their lives according to their own rules.

Through their critiques of the role of class and women in regards to marriage and use of rebellious character, it is clear that both Austen’s Pride and Prejudice and Weldon’s Letters to Alice, despite their socio-historical differences, are connected through their exploration of the challenges of living your own life within a society that continually suppresses your freedom. So, to answer my initial question: In a society bound by the constraints of class and gender restrictions, what chance did Elizabeth, the daughter of a struggling middle-class family, have in achieving equality with the aristocratic Mr. Darcy? Speech feature: Rhetorical questions don't suit in an essay. The truth is that at the time, she didn’t. However, through the subversiveness of Austen and Weldon’s writings, her chances today would be much greater. Slipping a little too far back into the speech style of expression in the latter half of this conclusion: Keep it formal!

What I love about this is that you've absolutely smashed me with contextual information. Usually, it's the opposite, so having a heap of it is great and shows that you get the importance of context! Really really good there, and you also have some fantastic concepts on display, awesome!  ;D

I have a few concerns with this, which I think stem from the fact that this started as a speech. I'll start with the big one: You aren't analysing your text.

The purpose of this module is to analyse your texts and compare how they differ in their portrayal of ideas across contexts. To analyse a text, you must explore the link between the text and the audience, with that key link being techniques. What techniques have been used by the composer, what do they want to achieve, and what is the impact on the audience? Technique, Explain, Audience, go to TEA!

In your essay, you aren't doing this, and there are very few direct quotes from the text. Instead, you have a heap of contextual information, which is great when mixed in with your analysis. You also have retell, explaining what actually happened in the text. This is unnecessary, because your marker has read it!  ;D

Getting the analysis right is absolutely crucial for any Module essay, so this is all I want you to focus on for the moment. Your paragraphs should literally be more complicated versions of this:

"Oi, this is a concept. My two texts talk about it. Austen uses this technique to show this and that teaches us this. Similarly, Weldon wants to show us the same thing, and uses this technique to do it instead. But Austen's use of this technique is reflective of this aspect of her context, and teaches us BLAH. Austen also uses BLAH in the quote BLAH to show us BLAH. Insert more stuff here. Thus, Austen and Weldon have clearly incorporated that concept I mentioned earlier into their texts in different ways based on contexts. Next paragraph. Jesus."

Ahaha, well to be a little less silly about it now:

"Austen's use of TECHNIQUE in "QUOTE" seeks to EXPLAIN WHAT THE PURPOSE IS, and reveals BLAH BLAH to the audience."

Sentences like that are the sort of things that should be in your essay  ;D

I've actually just posted an exemplar Module A essay, you may want to take a look at the approach I take and see this style of analysis in action  ;D

I hope this feedback (and the smaller comments) prove helpful in the lead up to Trials!!  ;D

sudodds

  • HSC Lecturer
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Part of the furniture
  • *******
  • Posts: 1753
  • "Seize the means of the HSC" ~ Vladimir Lenin
Re: English Advanced Essay Marking (Modules Only)
« Reply #436 on: July 25, 2016, 12:28:36 am »
Awesome! Thank you so much!! This is great feedback, and will definitely help me to improve my essay. I'll have another crack at it with your comments in mind, and hopefully I can push my marks up by trials :)

FREE HISTORY EXTENSION LECTURE - CLICK HERE FOR INFO!

2016 HSC: Modern History (18th in NSW) | History Extension (2nd place in the HTA Extension History Essay Prize) | Ancient History | Drama | English Advanced | Studies of Religion I | Economics

ATAR: 97.80

Studying a Bachelor of Communications: Media Arts and Production at UTS 😊

Looking for a history tutor? I'm ya girl! Feel free to send me a PM if you're interested!

jamonwindeyer

  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 10149
  • The lurker from the north.
Re: English Advanced Essay Marking (Modules Only)
« Reply #437 on: July 25, 2016, 12:30:09 am »
Awesome! Thank you so much!! This is great feedback, and will definitely help me to improve my essay. I'll have another crack at it with your comments in mind, and hopefully I can push my marks up by trials :)

No problem!! Hope it helps, let me know if any questions, with hard work you'll meet whatever goal you've set yourself  ;D

jamonwindeyer

  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 10149
  • The lurker from the north.
Re: English Advanced Essay Marking (Modules Only)
« Reply #438 on: July 25, 2016, 01:07:09 am »
Hi!

Could you please have a look at my Module B Hamlet essay, particularly the intro and conclusion, I am not quite sure how to construct them, as it is only the one text, I am not quite sure what else to include other than my thesis :) Thanks heaps, please provide heaps feedback, greatly appreciated :)

Hey! Absolutely I can, I'll be sure to pick at the intro and conclusion with a fine tooth comb  ;D your essay is attached with comments throughout in bold!

Spoiler
William Shakespeare’s revenge tragedy, Hamlet, has remained one of the most influential and celebrated texts in the literary canon. Your first sentence should normally be a little more conceptual, introduce some big main idea to your audience BEFORE you bring in the text as an example. Its exploration of metaphysical issues and universal themes has allowed it to transcend context and resonate with modern society. What themes specifically? Shakespeare uses the play to “hold, as ‘twere’, the mirror up to nature”, and display a paradigm of the intricacies of the human existence, which holds continuing relevance and significance. Hamlet emphatically delves into the rampant corruption and deception that beset the worldspace of Denmark. Good context link. More importantly however, Shakespeare illuminates and uncovers the conflict within Hamlet as he struggles to discern truth and reality amidst the corruption that permeates the play. Would you say therefore that corruption is your big-overarching idea? If so, it should be much closer to the front (and perhaps form your Thesis). Hamlet raises core philosophical questions which are able to resound with both an Elizabethan and contemporary audience. I'm looking for more specifics in terms of these philosophical questions, and it is THESE specifics that will help you form a stronger Thesis. I'm also looking for a JUDGEMENT, this is the Critical Module, so every essay will require you to say HOW WELL Shakespeare has crafted Hamlet to portray ideas!.

Instability and deterioration in the physical world distorts and corrupts truth. Great conceptual start! The underlying corruption and tension is disclosed from the very beginning when Hamlet states “time is out of joint”. This metaphor of time introduces images of disorder and chaos, which colour the entire play. Good. In Act 1 Scene 2, Shakespeare illustrates deception through dramatic binaries, the surfaces people adopt and the truths they hide. Claudius’s haughty tone in his inaugural speech “mirth in funeral and with dirge in marriage” contradicts his apparent intent. Furthermore, this paradoxical phrase illustrates the contrast between Claudius’s public and private personas. What does this show the audience about the distortion of truth? The encompassing inconsistency between appearance and reality is expressed in the notion of “seems”, for example, “Seems, madam! … I know not ‘seems’.” Shakespeare repeatedly refers to this notion of facades, through the use of words such as “pictures”, “appearances”, “seeing”, “seeming” to emphasise the deceitful nature of Elsinore. What does the audience therefore learn about deception? Hamlet’s first soliloquy, “O, that this too too solid flesh would melt” also explores the discrepancies in Elsinore. In the Shakespearean context, life is perceived to be kept constant through the maintenance of the Great Chain of Being or moral order. The use of intense punctuation and fragmented sentences highlights a break in this chain of being within the court of Denmark. The motif of disease and rotting imagery, such as “solid”, “unweeded garden”, “rank and gross in nature”, further emphasises the deception present at Elsinore and Hamlet’s passionate frustration and distress at this circumstance. This corrupted world is sustained throughout the play, enhancing Shakespeare’s commentary on the deception and corruption present in the world. A solid paragraph on the whole! Missing two things for me: Effective links to the audience (what do we learn?), and, again, judgements. How effective are these techniques? Were they more effective in Elizabethan days than to modern responders?

Hamlet’s struggle to attain truth in a mire of delusion and uncertainty reflects an inherent aspect of the human experience. Like your first paragraph, try to start conceptual. Hamlet’s dilemma is at its height in Act 2 Scene 2. Retell, remove this. Hamlet’s conversation with Polonius, “To be honest, as this world goes, is to be one man picked out of ten thousand” uses hyperbole to dramatize the difficult of attaining truth in a corrupt world, Hamlet’s cryptic tone and bitter satire further reflects his pessimism and disillusionment at a world that lacks truth. First half of this sentence was retell. The struggle to decipher the boundaries between truth and deceit is represented in the repetition of the word “honest” as Hamlet constantly questions the honesty of others, evident here and throughout the play. What does this reveal about honesty and the human experience for the audience? Hamlet’s soliloquy “O what a rogue and peasant slave am I!” reveals the very essence of Hamlet’s conflicted state of mind. Technique? Hamlet’s questions his delay to take vengeance through a series of rhetorical questions such as “Am I a coward?”, “Who calls me villain?” The self-deprecating language “dull and muddy-mettled rascal” is indicative of Hamlet deriding himself for his hesitation and lack of courage. Try to take your analysis away from "Hamlet does this" and here is a quote to prove it. Be completely separate from the plot of the text, Shakespeare uses THIS TECHNIQUE and this is HOW EFFECTIVELY he does it, and this is what it shows. Rinse, repeat. This image of “muddiness” demonstrates a lack of clarity, which is representative of Hamlet’s confusion. Furthermore, “plucks off my beard” metaphorically emphasises the themes of pretense and disguise, which is reiterated through the motif of “ears”, “hearing” and “spying”. Ears and hearing are a medium to discover truth; however, in the play it is often used as vehicles for murder and for distortion of truth. A prime example is the image of Claudius pouring poison into King Hamlet’s ear, which symbolises the corrosive effect of his dishonesty. Retell. This paradox reiterates the conflict and struggle to identify truth in the “rotten state of Denmark”. The conflict Hamlet experiences throughout the play, which is revealed through his soliloquies, can be attributed to his desire and preoccupation with revealing what is true and honest, yet having to maintain an “antic disposition” and being unable to act honestly himself. He is torn between medieval values and Renaissance Humanist thinking; he is aware of his duty to revenge his deceased father, yet he hesitates and constantly reflects, striving to search for realties and truth. Hamlet’s delay to exact vengeance offers an insight into his conflicted psychological place as he struggles to distinguish the truth from the deceitful and corrupted world around him. This paragraph is also good. Same comments as above, but also, this one is a little too much retell for me. Try to remove your reliance on the plot of the text and focus purely on techniques, you should be mentioning Shakespeare more than Hamlet. Why? Because Shakespeare is just using Hamlet as a PUPPET to portray HIS ideas. The focus should be on him and his choices as the composer, not what happens to Hamlet in the text.

The exposure of deception and façade restores truth to a world of utter corruption. Madness is a prominent feature of a revenge tragedy, it not only demonstrates the extent of corruption but also provide characters with the power to reveal truths. Good reference to form, remember to re-link the concept to Hamlet specifically though! In Act 4 Scene 5, Ophelia is overwhelmed by the corruption in Denmark and resolves to madness. Retell. The flowers Ophelia distributes, symbolises the truth she possesses in her mind. For example, Ophelia gives columbine, representing unfaithfulness, to Gertrude; and daisy, symbolizing deceit, to Claudius. Retell. She recognizes the corruption and deception in her world, and through madness, she is able to liberally express and communicate her truths to the audience. Any techniques accentuate this? It's a great audience link! Hamlet, similarly, also becomes a victim of corruption in his world as he ultimately comes to accept the inevitability of death. In the final scene, Hamlet relaxes his values as a Renaissance man and comes to accept his mortality. “If it be now, ‘tis not to come…if it be not now, yet it will come” illustrates the lack of control man has over his life. Technique? Hamlet’s newfound peace “the readiness is all” reveals that he is no longer inactive and that he has lost his moral values to the oppressing corruption that surround him. The juxtaposition of this fast-paced, highly energetic scene and the previous slow thinking and contemplative scene adds to the sense of absolute chaos. This chaos reveals the appearances, established by the rapid action of death as one character after another “wounds”, “hurts”, “falls” and “dies”. When everyone is dead, and the deceit and appearances are completely revealed and destroyed, the rebirth of truth and order begins with the entrance of Fortinbras, a vital outcome for an Elizabethan revenge tragedy as order and truth is restored. This paragraph lacks a proper conclusion, and further, does not have enough techniques and analysis!

Shakespeare explores the duality between truth and corruption through charactering Hamlet as a conflicted individual. Like the introduction, try to start your conclusion with something conceptual. The struggle to distinguish truth and reality amidst corruption and deception, which characterizes both Hamlet’s and our world today, is enduring and resounds with every single one of us, prompting us to question and possibly reach resolution in our own lives. Your conclusion needs a little more depth to it; re-list your themes, and importantly, ADD A JUDGEMENT at the end!

This is a really cool essay Aliceyyy98! Some awesome concepts throughout and well organised on the whole, good integration of quotes and techniques in most sections too  ;D

There are a few comments I'd make: Less retell, more audience links, and including a judgement, but I'll ramble a bit about your intro and conclusion. Let me know if you want some clarification of these other comments though (and be sure to check out the comments in the essay) ;D

Basically, I would say there are two things you can do to improve both your intro and conclusion.

First up: You are hitting almost every mark in the intro. Texts, themes, concepts, it's all there. The issue for me is the order in which they are presented. Just like your body paragraphs, your introduction should start with a conceptual statement. No text, purely just the main concept that summarises your essay. You focus a lot on the characters in your essay, so it could be:

Composers are able effectively communicate fundamental truths to their audience through effective characterisation. This allows them to communicate confronting truths to the audience, such as those revolving around the nature of truth and deception itself. Such is shown in the texts...

No mention of Hamlet, a general concept with links to the Module  ;D your Thesis will likely revolve around the notions of truth and reality, since they appear in your introduction anyway. But they should take centre stage!

Let me refer to the structure I mentioned to you a few days ago:


- Thesis
- Amplification (Extra Detail on Thesis)

- Introduce the Text and Composer
- Introduce themes to be discussed in the essay
- Link the composers use of techniques to the audience (both universal and contextual)

- Make your judgement about the effectiveness of these techniques in portraying the themes


What I've mentioned above would form your Thesis and Amplification (just any extra details you want to add, a good chance to link to the module aims). I've marked in green the bits that were in your Thesis paragraph already, the rest are in red, except your Thesis which is in orange: You had roots of a Thesis, but it didn't shine through  ;D

And there lies the second piece of feedback: A judgement. In this module, we are evaluating Hamlet as a text, so our Thesis must have judgement as to its effectiveness!  ;D

You have almost everything you need! It's just getting it in the right order ;D oh, and your conclusion will pretty much just morph with your intro, follow the same scaffold but with less detail  ;D i hope this helps!!  ;D

Aliceyyy98

  • Trailblazer
  • *
  • Posts: 43
  • School: Willoughby Girls High School
  • School Grad Year: 2016
Re: English Advanced Essay Marking (Modules Only)
« Reply #439 on: July 25, 2016, 01:25:45 am »
Hey! Absolutely I can, I'll be sure to pick at the intro and conclusion with a fine tooth comb  ;D your essay is attached with comments throughout in bold!

Spoiler
William Shakespeare’s revenge tragedy, Hamlet, has remained one of the most influential and celebrated texts in the literary canon. Your first sentence should normally be a little more conceptual, introduce some big main idea to your audience BEFORE you bring in the text as an example. Its exploration of metaphysical issues and universal themes has allowed it to transcend context and resonate with modern society. What themes specifically? Shakespeare uses the play to “hold, as ‘twere’, the mirror up to nature”, and display a paradigm of the intricacies of the human existence, which holds continuing relevance and significance. Hamlet emphatically delves into the rampant corruption and deception that beset the worldspace of Denmark. Good context link. More importantly however, Shakespeare illuminates and uncovers the conflict within Hamlet as he struggles to discern truth and reality amidst the corruption that permeates the play. Would you say therefore that corruption is your big-overarching idea? If so, it should be much closer to the front (and perhaps form your Thesis). Hamlet raises core philosophical questions which are able to resound with both an Elizabethan and contemporary audience. I'm looking for more specifics in terms of these philosophical questions, and it is THESE specifics that will help you form a stronger Thesis. I'm also looking for a JUDGEMENT, this is the Critical Module, so every essay will require you to say HOW WELL Shakespeare has crafted Hamlet to portray ideas!.

Instability and deterioration in the physical world distorts and corrupts truth. Great conceptual start! The underlying corruption and tension is disclosed from the very beginning when Hamlet states “time is out of joint”. This metaphor of time introduces images of disorder and chaos, which colour the entire play. Good. In Act 1 Scene 2, Shakespeare illustrates deception through dramatic binaries, the surfaces people adopt and the truths they hide. Claudius’s haughty tone in his inaugural speech “mirth in funeral and with dirge in marriage” contradicts his apparent intent. Furthermore, this paradoxical phrase illustrates the contrast between Claudius’s public and private personas. What does this show the audience about the distortion of truth? The encompassing inconsistency between appearance and reality is expressed in the notion of “seems”, for example, “Seems, madam! … I know not ‘seems’.” Shakespeare repeatedly refers to this notion of facades, through the use of words such as “pictures”, “appearances”, “seeing”, “seeming” to emphasise the deceitful nature of Elsinore. What does the audience therefore learn about deception? Hamlet’s first soliloquy, “O, that this too too solid flesh would melt” also explores the discrepancies in Elsinore. In the Shakespearean context, life is perceived to be kept constant through the maintenance of the Great Chain of Being or moral order. The use of intense punctuation and fragmented sentences highlights a break in this chain of being within the court of Denmark. The motif of disease and rotting imagery, such as “solid”, “unweeded garden”, “rank and gross in nature”, further emphasises the deception present at Elsinore and Hamlet’s passionate frustration and distress at this circumstance. This corrupted world is sustained throughout the play, enhancing Shakespeare’s commentary on the deception and corruption present in the world. A solid paragraph on the whole! Missing two things for me: Effective links to the audience (what do we learn?), and, again, judgements. How effective are these techniques? Were they more effective in Elizabethan days than to modern responders?

Hamlet’s struggle to attain truth in a mire of delusion and uncertainty reflects an inherent aspect of the human experience. Like your first paragraph, try to start conceptual. Hamlet’s dilemma is at its height in Act 2 Scene 2. Retell, remove this. Hamlet’s conversation with Polonius, “To be honest, as this world goes, is to be one man picked out of ten thousand” uses hyperbole to dramatize the difficult of attaining truth in a corrupt world, Hamlet’s cryptic tone and bitter satire further reflects his pessimism and disillusionment at a world that lacks truth. First half of this sentence was retell. The struggle to decipher the boundaries between truth and deceit is represented in the repetition of the word “honest” as Hamlet constantly questions the honesty of others, evident here and throughout the play. What does this reveal about honesty and the human experience for the audience? Hamlet’s soliloquy “O what a rogue and peasant slave am I!” reveals the very essence of Hamlet’s conflicted state of mind. Technique? Hamlet’s questions his delay to take vengeance through a series of rhetorical questions such as “Am I a coward?”, “Who calls me villain?” The self-deprecating language “dull and muddy-mettled rascal” is indicative of Hamlet deriding himself for his hesitation and lack of courage. Try to take your analysis away from "Hamlet does this" and here is a quote to prove it. Be completely separate from the plot of the text, Shakespeare uses THIS TECHNIQUE and this is HOW EFFECTIVELY he does it, and this is what it shows. Rinse, repeat. This image of “muddiness” demonstrates a lack of clarity, which is representative of Hamlet’s confusion. Furthermore, “plucks off my beard” metaphorically emphasises the themes of pretense and disguise, which is reiterated through the motif of “ears”, “hearing” and “spying”. Ears and hearing are a medium to discover truth; however, in the play it is often used as vehicles for murder and for distortion of truth. A prime example is the image of Claudius pouring poison into King Hamlet’s ear, which symbolises the corrosive effect of his dishonesty. Retell. This paradox reiterates the conflict and struggle to identify truth in the “rotten state of Denmark”. The conflict Hamlet experiences throughout the play, which is revealed through his soliloquies, can be attributed to his desire and preoccupation with revealing what is true and honest, yet having to maintain an “antic disposition” and being unable to act honestly himself. He is torn between medieval values and Renaissance Humanist thinking; he is aware of his duty to revenge his deceased father, yet he hesitates and constantly reflects, striving to search for realties and truth. Hamlet’s delay to exact vengeance offers an insight into his conflicted psychological place as he struggles to distinguish the truth from the deceitful and corrupted world around him. This paragraph is also good. Same comments as above, but also, this one is a little too much retell for me. Try to remove your reliance on the plot of the text and focus purely on techniques, you should be mentioning Shakespeare more than Hamlet. Why? Because Shakespeare is just using Hamlet as a PUPPET to portray HIS ideas. The focus should be on him and his choices as the composer, not what happens to Hamlet in the text.

The exposure of deception and façade restores truth to a world of utter corruption. Madness is a prominent feature of a revenge tragedy, it not only demonstrates the extent of corruption but also provide characters with the power to reveal truths. Good reference to form, remember to re-link the concept to Hamlet specifically though! In Act 4 Scene 5, Ophelia is overwhelmed by the corruption in Denmark and resolves to madness. Retell. The flowers Ophelia distributes, symbolises the truth she possesses in her mind. For example, Ophelia gives columbine, representing unfaithfulness, to Gertrude; and daisy, symbolizing deceit, to Claudius. Retell. She recognizes the corruption and deception in her world, and through madness, she is able to liberally express and communicate her truths to the audience. Any techniques accentuate this? It's a great audience link! Hamlet, similarly, also becomes a victim of corruption in his world as he ultimately comes to accept the inevitability of death. In the final scene, Hamlet relaxes his values as a Renaissance man and comes to accept his mortality. “If it be now, ‘tis not to come…if it be not now, yet it will come” illustrates the lack of control man has over his life. Technique? Hamlet’s newfound peace “the readiness is all” reveals that he is no longer inactive and that he has lost his moral values to the oppressing corruption that surround him. The juxtaposition of this fast-paced, highly energetic scene and the previous slow thinking and contemplative scene adds to the sense of absolute chaos. This chaos reveals the appearances, established by the rapid action of death as one character after another “wounds”, “hurts”, “falls” and “dies”. When everyone is dead, and the deceit and appearances are completely revealed and destroyed, the rebirth of truth and order begins with the entrance of Fortinbras, a vital outcome for an Elizabethan revenge tragedy as order and truth is restored. This paragraph lacks a proper conclusion, and further, does not have enough techniques and analysis!

Shakespeare explores the duality between truth and corruption through charactering Hamlet as a conflicted individual. Like the introduction, try to start your conclusion with something conceptual. The struggle to distinguish truth and reality amidst corruption and deception, which characterizes both Hamlet’s and our world today, is enduring and resounds with every single one of us, prompting us to question and possibly reach resolution in our own lives. Your conclusion needs a little more depth to it; re-list your themes, and importantly, ADD A JUDGEMENT at the end!

This is a really cool essay Aliceyyy98! Some awesome concepts throughout and well organised on the whole, good integration of quotes and techniques in most sections too  ;D

There are a few comments I'd make: Less retell, more audience links, and including a judgement, but I'll ramble a bit about your intro and conclusion. Let me know if you want some clarification of these other comments though (and be sure to check out the comments in the essay) ;D

Basically, I would say there are two things you can do to improve both your intro and conclusion.

First up: You are hitting almost every mark in the intro. Texts, themes, concepts, it's all there. The issue for me is the order in which they are presented. Just like your body paragraphs, your introduction should start with a conceptual statement. No text, purely just the main concept that summarises your essay. You focus a lot on the characters in your essay, so it could be:

Composers are able effectively communicate fundamental truths to their audience through effective characterisation. This allows them to communicate confronting truths to the audience, such as those revolving around the nature of truth and deception itself. Such is shown in the texts...

No mention of Hamlet, a general concept with links to the Module  ;D your Thesis will likely revolve around the notions of truth and reality, since they appear in your introduction anyway. But they should take centre stage!

Let me refer to the structure I mentioned to you a few days ago:


- Thesis
- Amplification (Extra Detail on Thesis)

- Introduce the Text and Composer
- Introduce themes to be discussed in the essay
- Link the composers use of techniques to the audience (both universal and contextual)

- Make your judgement about the effectiveness of these techniques in portraying the themes


What I've mentioned above would form your Thesis and Amplification (just any extra details you want to add, a good chance to link to the module aims). I've marked in green the bits that were in your Thesis paragraph already, the rest are in red, except your Thesis which is in orange: You had roots of a Thesis, but it didn't shine through  ;D

And there lies the second piece of feedback: A judgement. In this module, we are evaluating Hamlet as a text, so our Thesis must have judgement as to its effectiveness!  ;D

You have almost everything you need! It's just getting it in the right order ;D oh, and your conclusion will pretty much just morph with your intro, follow the same scaffold but with less detail  ;D i hope this helps!!  ;D


Thank you so much!! Super clear as always! Just one question, how would incorprate judgments into my essay? Would it be too informal?

jamonwindeyer

  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 10149
  • The lurker from the north.
Re: English Advanced Essay Marking (Modules Only)
« Reply #440 on: July 25, 2016, 01:30:23 am »

Thank you so much!! Super clear as always! Just one question, how would incorprate judgments into my essay? Would it be too informal?

No problem!! Elyse put it best; adverbs/adjectives!

Shakespeare effectively...
The use of figurative language cleverly...
This concept is accentuated through the powerful use of...

Even just incorporation of these words, with reference to Shakespeare's goals as a composer, does the trick  ;D

Aliceyyy98

  • Trailblazer
  • *
  • Posts: 43
  • School: Willoughby Girls High School
  • School Grad Year: 2016
Re: English Advanced Essay Marking (Modules Only)
« Reply #441 on: July 25, 2016, 11:41:07 am »
No problem!! Elyse put it best; adverbs/adjectives!

Shakespeare effectively...
The use of figurative language cleverly...
This concept is accentuated through the powerful use of...

Even just incorporation of these words, with reference to Shakespeare's goals as a composer, does the trick  ;D

Hi Jamon,

is this a better intro?

Composers are able to effectively communicate fundamental aspects of the human condition to their audience through complex characterization and universal themes, such as those revolving around the nature of truth and deception. This is explored in Shakespeare’s play, Hamlet. Adopting the conventions of a revenge tragedy, the dramatic form of Hamlet exposes the audience to the rampant dishonesty and deception that beset the worldspace of Denmark, where Shakespeare illuminates and uncovers the conflict within the protagonist as he struggles to discern truth and reality amidst the corruption that permeates the play. Produced at a time of political and moral disorder in Elizabethan England, Shakespeare has cleverly incorporated these conflicting beliefs into the complex characterization of Hamlet to examine powerful metaphysical issues regarding both the individual and the ever-changing world, which are able to resonate strongly with both the Elizabethan and the contemporary audiences today.

Thank you so much! this is really helping me improve my essay :)

jamonwindeyer

  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 10149
  • The lurker from the north.
Re: English Advanced Essay Marking (Modules Only)
« Reply #442 on: July 25, 2016, 12:01:24 pm »
Hello I wrote an essay on Module C for brave new world and V for Vendetta. I got 15/20 for this essay which i memorised and the question was the same so i wrote exactly word to word. Please go brutal because I really need higher marks for trials :/ 

Examine how texts represent the impact political acts may have on individual lives or society more broadly.

Spoiler
Composers employ various elements of their representational mediums to elucidate their critique on the impact of political corruption on the individual and broader society. Through their differing textual forms, composers highlight the abuse of political power through acts such as coercive conformity and social conditioning in forbidding the state to see the significance of the individual. Fantastic Thesis and amplification, good conceptual approach and link to module! However, society possesses a higher independent power that can challenge tyrannical authority and its oppressive demands that sacrifices one’s individuality. Author Aldous Huxley, applies the medium of a satirical novel in Brave New World (1932) to convey his condemnation of dictatorial states, which propels responders to understand the value of individuality and how the abuse of political power can limit the human experience. Director James Mc Teague draws upon his quasi-historical film through cinematographic techniques in V for Vendetta (2005) to further represent the threat of covert political motivations in driving unjust acts, and suppressing individual liberties. Great text introductions, gives me an overview of purpose and form very quickly. Through both a satirical novel and quasi-historical film, both composers effectively use their mediums to concurrently represent their differing political viewpoints, which propels responders to understand the complexity of the political environment and the negative and positive effects of its exploitation on individuals and broader society. Fantastic introduction! I'd only suggest adding a list of what your paragraph topics will be, besides that, fantastic!

Composers employ an intended contrast of styles to emphasize how ones’ individuality is subtly negotiated for totalitarian stability. In Brave New World, Huxley utilizes a satiric perspective to represent authoritative brutality through the idea of soma and social conditioning. Good conceptual intro and amplification, concept first then bring in the text later. Huxley exposes the tyranny of conformism through the sardonic use of exaggeration of the happy tenor within “the warm, the richly coloured, the infinitely friendly soma-holiday.” While highlighting Huxley’s cynical take on the consumerist ideology and drugs, the emblematic anaphora allows responders to question the war against drugs, where authority is still unable to eliminate its presence in modern society. Fantastic analysis. These stratagems are recurrent in the novel representing the abuse of censorship as a political act, which is made evident within “the mind that judges and desires and decides- make up of… our [the state] suggestions!” Technique here? Try to use the quote and technique in the same sentence so I don't wonder where it is (I know it's coming up). The understatement of ‘suggestions’ emphasises the austerity of the commandments from the state, and the manipulation of the government in instilling an obedient culture within the social classes. Hence, suppressing the intellectual mind that can powerfully catalyse a revolution against authority. Bit more of an audience link here? In addition, this systematic totalitarian ideology highlights Huxley’s satiric take on the Marxist ideology, which claimed social equality but rather feeds the power vacuum of oppressive dictators. Thus, Huxley effectively uses satire to represent his competing perspective on the impact of political acts and its motivations on individual liberties and society as a whole. Fantastic paragraph, extremely effective!
 
In addition, to indoctrinate the population with a cult of culture aimed at conformity is a political act that weakens civil opposition and limits individuality. A broadened representation on the abuse of political control is emphasised through the satiric use of reversal within the asyndeton “community, stability and identity.” Deliberately placing significance on the term community, before identity, reinforces that stability is maintained by coercing an individual to government subordination and depriving the citizen of individuality. This is reiterated through the assonance, “everyone belongs to everyone else” which objectifies and dehumanises the individual to be merely the property of another. Audience link? However, Huxley emphasises the power of the cooperation between the individual and society that can challenge tyrannical authority and its oppressive demands that sacrifices one’s individuality. Lenina gives evidence to this within “when the individual feels, the community reels” highlighting that political acts will never truly impact everyone, as one’s ideas can be contagious upon the rest of the community and can shake the stability of the government. Technique here? Be careful to focus on representation, Lenina is just a puppet of Huxley! Thus, Huxley employs satire as a mechanism to propose his critique and dystopian perspective that emphasises that politics is a double edged sword. That is, oppressive political acts such as coercive conformity cannot impact an individual when society stands against tyrannical dictatorships and its injustices.[bAnother great paragraph![/b]

In V for Vendetta, director, James Mc. Teague employs the medium of a quasi-historical film and through cinematographic techniques, represents his perspective on authoritative brutality. Try to have a conceptual start like your prior paragraphs, also be sure to spell McTeigue's name correctly!! The diegetic wails of terror and close-up shots of Evey’s panicked expression as she is held at knife-edge by the secret police assists with Mc. Teague’s depiction of a dictatorial government’s abusive oppression. Chiaroscuro lighting casts Evey into intense light, emphasising her vulnerability, which positions the shocked audience to consider the dreadful impact of such tyrannical control. Fantastic. However, through the protagonist, V, Mc. Teague represents his underlying concept that acts of political oppression will not impact the individual and broader society, if used as a catalyst to challenge political rule. This concept is further captured through V’s costume, his mask illuminated by low-key lighting, and the close up shot of V orating, “People should not be afraid of their government; governments should be afraid of their people.” You could include a literary term for this quote, it is very powerful. Thus, emphasising the forceful impact of negative political acts and its motivations in creating V to “become a monster,” has enhanced his courage to challenge political oppression. This relays, unjust political acts are not an obstacle affecting the individual or society, rather they can become the driving force which unites a community to fight for vigilant justice and overthrow dictatorial states to advance for the better.  A slightly more conclusive finish needed here I feel.

Teague’s satirical representation of the government’s exploitation of the media for political purposes is intended to manipulate the audience to question the extent to which they themselves are victims of such deception and censorship. Again, I'm looking for a more conceptual start. Talk about deception and censorship generally, and only then bring in your text. In the context of the patriot act resulting from the paradigm shift after 9/11 which gave broad ranging powers to the American government to survey suspected terrorists, the director represents political figures to be of barbarous nature. Great contextual link! The mid-shot angles and diegetic sounds of swords clashing, captures the satiric use of reversal as government officers attempt to rape a civilian, which highlights Teague exposing the hypocritical nature of authority in challenging the idea of civil protection and safety. Perfect. Also, through the mise en scene of propaganda posters and curfew signs along with news broadcasts through the media, the director represents the extent of manipulation political acts impose on society. What does this show the audience in general? Showcasing a montage of news broadcasts through fabricated issues, such as “civil war,” “water shortages”, “avian flu” and “airborne pathogens,” represents the abuse of media to instill fear within the populace, hence, coercing them into obedience. Slightly retell here, be careful not to rely on diegetic film aspects too much. As such, Mc. Teague positions viewers to consider the corruption of the media and political leaders within their own contexts through a confronting representation of the media’s dishonesty in this quasi-realistic state.

Government authority and the people cooperate in a symbiotic relationship in shaping the political environment and driving society towards advancement for the better. However, technological and scientific advancements are exploited at the hands of authority to impose decisions that negate one’s individuality and coerce society under government subordination. Huxley effectively uses his satiric medium to ridicule such actions and create awareness on the importance of people power. Mc Teague provides insight into the perspective of a hero, who was deemed a historical assassin to highlight the need to challenge authority that suppresses individual liberties. Through various forms and mediums, audiences gain a deeper appreciation and understanding of the political environment and that resilience is necessary to defy against the individual and social impacts oppressive political acts pose.

This is an awesome essay Kim! Amazing analysis, fantastic conceptual idea, with excellent links to context throughout as well. It fulfils the aims of this module extremely well, absolutely wonderful work!

I personally think 15/20 is quite harsh, I would have given this a little higher than that! But to justify the mark, and improve it for next time, my big suggestion would be ensuring that your essay responds to the question at hand consistently. I think in areas you do it really well, but you do fall away a tiny little bit in the last paragraph. A good check for this is to ensure that your intro and conclusion both match explicitly to each other and the question at hand, if they don't then chances are you got off track somewhere in the paragraph!

A few over arching things you could fix up (minor issues):

- Ensure all your paragraphs have a conceptual start, and only bring in the text after the concept is established. You did this for Huxley, but not McTeigue.
- Ensure that every example has a technique associated with it, and importantly, that these techniques are varied: This is a representation module! Therefore, everything must be focused on Huxley's representational choices
- Similarly, don't overly rely on the "world space" or "mise en scene," which are just more fancy ways of using a retell of the text and its features as analysis. It works in isolation, but do it too much and you'll slip into retell. You get close in the final paragraph, but you may want to consider this holistically also, because I think it is where your a couple of your marks went. Too much retell sours the marker.
- Ensure that you consistently (you are almost doing it consistently now) link to the audience and what we learn about the concept from the technique. How does the technique represent the idea? Why was that technique chosen over others?

To be honest though, I think this is a brilliant essay, Definitely some issues that can be fixed, but I would still consider it to be up there in the high range. I'm keen to figure out where those marks went (Module C was the module I struggled with most personally, I never managed 20/20 like I did for the others, so there is a real possibility I've missed something in my marking). What was the feedback you got from the teacher? Eager to work with you to improve it!  :D

jamonwindeyer

  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 10149
  • The lurker from the north.
Re: English Advanced Essay Marking (Modules Only)
« Reply #443 on: July 25, 2016, 12:05:26 pm »
Hi Jamon,

is this a better intro?

Composers are able to effectively communicate fundamental aspects of the human condition to their audience through complex characterization and universal themes, such as those revolving around the nature of truth and deception. This is explored in Shakespeare’s play, Hamlet. Adopting the conventions of a revenge tragedy, the dramatic form of Hamlet exposes the audience to the rampant dishonesty and deception that beset the worldspace of Denmark, where Shakespeare illuminates and uncovers the conflict within the protagonist as he struggles to discern truth and reality amidst the corruption that permeates the play. Produced at a time of political and moral disorder in Elizabethan England, Shakespeare has cleverly incorporated these conflicting beliefs into the complex characterization of Hamlet to examine powerful metaphysical issues regarding both the individual and the ever-changing world, which are able to resonate strongly with both the Elizabethan and the contemporary audiences today.

Thank you so much! this is really helping me improve my essay :)

I think it is definitely better! I'd like some more expansion on the "truth and deception" part of your Thesis though, and I think you might want to go a little more conceptual with how you summarise the purpose of Hamlet. Don't just talk about the world space, talk about what Shakespeare wants to communicate in general (this is a nit pick), what does he want the audience to learn about truth and deception?  ;D

amycronin

  • Fresh Poster
  • *
  • Posts: 1
  • School: St Scholastica's College
  • School Grad Year: 2016
Re: English Advanced Essay Marking (Modules Only)
« Reply #444 on: July 25, 2016, 03:48:33 pm »
Hi here's my essay for Module A - intertextual connections (Pride and Prejudice and Letters to Alice)

Hoping you can give me some advice on improvements for extra marks
Thank you so much!!
Spoiler
2015 Catholic Trial:
How does the study of Letters to Alice on First Reading Jane Austen enrich your understanding of the complexity of social expectations in Pride and Prejudice?
In your response make detailed reference to your prescribed texts.


A close examination of Weldon’s epistolary novel ‘Letters to Alice on First Reading Jane enriches our understanding of the complex expectations evident in Jane Austen’s ‘Pride and Prejudice’ through providing historical information and relating Austen’s issues through a post-modern context. In the words of Weldon; “The times in which writers live are important”, especially in the case of Jane Austen, living in regency England, a society governed by rules and expectations controlling many major aspects in the lives of its individuals. Reading ‘Pride and Prejudice’ enriches our understanding of what it means to be a young woman restricted by complex societal expectations. Fay Weldon’s purpose, and that of her narrator, in the novel ‘Letters to Alice’ is decidedly didactic, seeking to inform the fictional character Alice, and therefore us as readers, of the value of Jane Austen and “Literature with a capital L”. With this purpose in mind, Weldon explores the complex social structures of Austen’s world, furthering our appreciation and knowledge of these expectations and their impact on the characters in ‘Pride and Prejudice’.

Weldon’s purpose is to teach us, help us understand the issues Jane Austen was surrounded with and the complex social conventions she was expected to succumb to. Weldon delves into the intricate societal expectations conveyed in ‘Pride and Prejudice’ in order to allow us to appreciate more fully the extent and implications of these expectations on young women in Austen’s world. Weldon uses a conversational style to explore marriage, which is predominantly featured in Austen’s novels, but also depicts the other issues going on within the context of these novels. Weldon uses factual and statistical information to reinforce the very real level of severity with which young women were subject to. While marriage was important for monetary gain, it was also vital in regards to the legitimacy of children, as, if one were to give birth out of wedlock you would “spend the rest of your life in a lunatic asylum, classified as a moral imbecile.” Weldon also comments on the high levels of poverty of the time “Because people were so poor ... they would run, and toil, and sweat all day and all night to save themselves and their children from starvation.” Through her novel, Weldon allows us to sympathise and understand, in order to more fully engage with the text and the world of the characters.

Marriage played a vital part in the lives of young women during Jane Austen’s life and so heavily influenced her writing and the attitudes of her characters. Marriage for young women was viewed as an expectation on a familial and social level, as the consequences for remaining single were often viewed as disastrous. Women had little employment opportunities and any money from the woman’s family would most likely be inherited by male family members, as shown in the entailment of the Longbourn estate to Mr Collins. Therefore, as Weldon explains, marriage “was a woman’s aim” and the only sure pathway to security. Weldon transfers this issue to a contemporary context through the comparison of Asian women marrying white ranchers “in order to survive”, suggesting that even today some women still experience the confines felt by women such as Charlotte Lucas. The matrimony of Charlotte and Mr Collins portrays the realistic and almost business-like perspective of marriage, as, though love is not involved, through the union Charlotte achieves a sense of security and Mr Collins has a wife to present to his patroness Lady Catherine. Through her alter ego, Aunt Fay, Weldon encourages us to further our understanding of the severe impact this societal convention of marriage had on young women, “Women were born poor, and stayed poor, and lived well only by their husbands’ favour,” causing us to sympathise with the character of Mrs Bennet who understood the full extent of hardship her daughters could face if they remained single. Through Weldon’s provision of historical information, she forces us as readers to look further than Austen’s satirical representation and consider the very real impacts of marriage in this context.

In reading ‘Pride and Prejudice’ we become aware of the rigid and complex social class system present in Austen’s time. This is particularly represented through the characterisation of Lady Catherine who embodies the social hierarchy of the time and comments “Your alliance will be a disgrace...” to Elizabeth concerning her relationship with Darcy. Through the character of Elizabeth, Austen challenges this class system “...he is a gentleman and I am a gentleman’s daughter: so far we are equal,” providing a new meaning of social equals. In this novel, Jane Austen presents the radical idea, which is widely accepted in our society today, that marriage should be between equals and the ideal match is based on genuine affection. This is shown in the irony of the famous opening line which foreshadows this desperate pursuit of marriage in Austen’s time, but also satirises the idea of marrying purely for monetary gain. Weldon provides historical evidence regarding the class system which Austen criticised, stating that this communion was only possible under “unbelievable circumstances”. Weldon’s narration allows us to realise the great extent to which Austen was “swim[ming] against the stream” in her ideas, giving the reader a greater depth of knowledge regarding the audience Austen was facing.

In conclusion, Fay Weldon analyses and explains the complex social expectations observed in Jane Austen’s ‘Pride and Prejudice’ through her novel ‘Letters to Alice on First Reading Jane Austen’. Weldon’s explanation enriches our understanding of these expectations through providing historical evidence and relating the issues through a post-modern context. This allows us as contemporary readers to become more engaged with Austen’s text and realise the impact of her context on the novel.

Moderator Action: Added spoiler  :D
« Last Edit: July 25, 2016, 07:48:51 pm by jamonwindeyer »

isaacdelatorre

  • HSC Lecturer
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 303
Re: English Advanced Essay Marking (Modules Only)
« Reply #445 on: July 25, 2016, 07:08:11 pm »
Hello,

Could I please, please, please get some feedback on my Module A essay?
For this task, I only got 12/15 and would really like to boost my mark in this module. Please be as brutal as you can with it. Also I'm a little concerned with the length of it, if you had any thoughts on what parts to cull or make more succinct; I am open to any and all suggestions.

Thank you soo much :D

Spoiler
The the inescapable power of a composer’s context becomes evident through composer’s exploration of universal issues concerning love, which shapes their perspective, language and form; inviting responders to reflect on the values within each context that influence perceptions of love. The complex nature of love is revealed as it cannot be singularly classified; instead contextual values influence contrasting perspectives that challenge other widely accepted contemporary expectations of love. Elizabeth Barrett Browning’s (EBB) 1850s poems Sonnets from the Portuguese allows her to escape from oppressive patriarchal attitudes prevalent within the Victorian era through her ideal love. Similarly, F. Scott Fitzgerald’s 1955 novel The Great Gatsby criticises superficiality prominent in the Jazz Age, guiding the existential ‘lost generation’ by promoting idealised love. Both present similar perspectives that pursuing ideal love, even when condemned by contextual expectations of love and gender, catalyses actions to attain ideal love. The texts differ when exploring the ability to withstand the patriarchy and superficiality, which hinges on the procurement of ideal love.

EBB, through the persona, reveals the complexity of love through her own spiritual perception of ideal love; contrasting to the oppressive perception of love within the Victorian era, motivating her to act to attain her ideal love. Her ideal love is more intense and thus condemned by the patriarchal expectations of women, represented by the utilisation of iambic pentameter in every sonnet “Say thou dost love me, love me, love me – toll” alluding to a heartbeat, symbolising her overwhelming desire for pure love. Her pursuit of ideal love contrasts the Victorian constraint on love and marriage which emphasised status and financial gain; opposing the purity EBB desires. Through negation and accumulation within “Do not say I love her for her smile … her way of looking ... her way of speaking gently” represents her desire for a pure love that rejects love as shallow and superficial. In her pursuit, EBB is forced to caution love that does not meet her expectations, contrasting Victorian attitudes of women as submissive and obedient towards love, exemplified through celestial imagery and juxtaposition, conveying her attitude of impermanence “Sun rose on thine oath to love me, I looked to the moon.” EBB adopts her contexts emerging empirical search for truth, thus challenging uneducated stereotypes of women through her intelligent and wary empirical quest. EBB challenges Victorian perspectives of love to obtain a pure love that meets her expectations exposing her desire to challenge the historical and cultural values of women and love contradicting hers, thus revealing the complexity of love.

EBB reveals the complex nature of love as she is able to defy restrictive patriarchal values of love that condemn her pursuit, only when ideal love is attained. In sonnet XLII, she declares her love for Robert, the intended audience of her poetry, through the repetition of “I love thee” juxtaposing the cautious tone present in every other sonnet, indicating her procurement of her ideal love. Attaining pure love enables EBB to break free from female stereotypes, exemplified by “hold the torch out where the winds are rough,” utilising tactile imagery to metaphorically capture EBB’s ability to promote her views on gender equality in her patriarchal context, where one women were married, money and power went to their husband whilst EBB remains independent; illustrating complex, contradictory perspectives of love. Rigid structures on love influence EBB’s chosen form of the Petrarchan sonnet which followed specific rhyme and meter, representing strict Victorian views of love. However, EBB’s manipulation of the structure evident in her unconventional Volta placement in such as “but there, the silver answer rang” in line 13, symbolises her ability to challenge expectations of love and the submissive women when her ideal love is attained. Her ability to withstand gender stereotypes is reinforced as she metaphorically “slackens all those bonds” in sonnet XXXII, reflecting her transcendence of her personal context, ignoring her fathers wishes not to marry due to her disabilities; instead pursuing her spiritual love by marrying a younger man at age 40, older than the average 18-year-old. EBB exposes the complex nature of love by proving that only by attaining ideal love can she withstand the societal expectations of women by promoting gender equality; and also overcoming personal contextual disadvantage.

Like EBB’s desire for her condemned, ideal love and its subsequent motivational power; F. Scott Fitzgerald also conveys the complexity of multiple perceptions of ideal love by condemning the hedonistic contextual values which contrast Gatsby’s ideal love. Fitzgerald’s repetition of hyperbolised parties centred on wealth and self-indulgence indicate the values of Fitzgerald’s context; exposed in the simile “men and girls came like moths among the whisperings and the champagne and the stars” Juxtaposition of cacophonic and euphoric imagery allows Fitzgerald to criticise the immorality of superficial satisfaction from wealth as it causes apathy to repercussions, following America’s success in WWI. Just like EBB’s desire for pure love, Gatsby’s longing for ideal love was uncommon during the 1920’s where hedonistic attitudes reduced the sanctity of marriage as exemplified by Tom and Daisy’s separate infidelity. Materialistic attitudes force Gatsby to become obsessed with attaining such love, even if impossible. Biblical allusions accentuate his desire especially when it goes against hedonistic societal norms “He had committed himself to following the Holy Grail” demonstrates his willingness to act in pursuit of his ideal love even if unattainable as his ideal love is represented by Daisy who is corrupt by superficiality and will not fit his ideal love. Thus Fitzgerald harshly critiques the superficial hedonism of the roaring 20s revealing the complexity of love as it challenges his and Gatsby’s ideal love, just as EBB’s context challenged hers.

Unlike EBB’s attainment of pure love, enabling her to withstand patriarchal Victorian values; Fitzgerald conveys the complexity of love in that it is the only platform with which we can withstand contextual values, if not attained, we succumb to superficial values that surround us. Fitzgerald’s condemnation of hedonistic values is revealed as Gatsby is unable to procure his ideal love due to Daisy, who Gatsby believes embodies his ideal love, already being consumed by materialism. The high modal hyperbole present within “Daisy tumbled short of his dreams … because of the colossal vitality of his illusion” portraying the complexity of love as it foreshadows his failure at gaining ideal love. His inability to attain his ideal love is reinforced through his objectification of Daisy within “his count of enchanted objects had diminished by one” conveying the impossibility of obtaining his ideal love, revealed through the whimsical and fanciful tone; also exposing his superficiality as his ideal love is reduced into a materialistic “object.” Gatsby’s inability to withstand hedonistic attitudes in the rebellion against alcohol prohibition influences the form of the novel as Fitzgerald’s use of characterisation reveals how Gatsby becomes consumed by these hedonistic attitudes due to not attaining ideal love. Contrasting EBB, who declares her independence and challenges patriarchal constraints because she acquires her ideal love. Fitzgerald’s condemnation of hedonistic values is represented by Gatsby, who in his inability to attain his ideal love, becomes consumed by immoral attitudes thus revealing the complexity of love.

Thus the complexity of love is revealed as it is unique and so powerful, that allows for the withstanding of contextual values. A composers’ desire to challenge the attitudes they consider immoral such as the patriarchy and materialism, affect their perspective of love. Exemplified by disparate texts such as Elizabeth Barrett Browning’s Sonnets from the Portuguese and F. Scott Fitzgerald’s The Great Gatsby, sharing the perspective that ideal love motivates acts to attain it, going against gender and superficial values. However, only through attaining ideal love is EBB able to withstand gender constructs confining her; conversely Fitzgerald’s protagonist continually succumbs to immoral hedonistic values.
HSC 2016:   ATAR: 99+
Mathematics - 97    Economics - 96     Legal Studies - 95     Advanced English - 91    Business Studies - 95

2017: B Commerce/B Law @ UNSW  

jamonwindeyer

  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 10149
  • The lurker from the north.
Re: English Advanced Essay Marking (Modules Only)
« Reply #446 on: July 25, 2016, 07:41:45 pm »
Hi here's my essay for Module A - intertextual connections (Pride and Prejudice and Letters to Alice)

Hoping you can give me some advice on improvements for extra marks
Thank you so much!!

Hey Amy! Welcome to the forums!  ;D

Thanks for posting your essay, however, you need 5 ATAR Notes posts for every essay you'd like marked. So one essay needs 5 posts, 20 essays needs 100 posts, etc etc  ;D This is to ensure that the service remains accessible for all active members of the ATAR Notes community. Full rules are at the link in my signature  :)

So you just need 4 more posts. Feel free to hang around the forums, ask questions, chat about stuff, you can also go make your first (second) post in our New User's Lounge! When you have met the criteria, come back and let us know!  ;D

jamonwindeyer

  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 10149
  • The lurker from the north.
Re: English Advanced Essay Marking (Modules Only)
« Reply #447 on: July 25, 2016, 08:25:26 pm »
This is an adaptable module B essay that i've changed up a fair bit, I was wondering if you would be able to give me some feedback regarding changes that have to be made or places where I've gone awry. Cheers a tonne

Hey Jimmy!! I sure can, I'll treat it as a completely stand alone version (since I don't think I marked this last time, I lose track, aha) so you can see whether your changes have addressed your old feedback  ;D oh, and this is a Module A essay I am sure, not Module B right?

Essay is attached with comments in bold!

Spoiler
The study of texts with alternate social, cultural and historical contexts, such as Fritz Lang’s Metropolis and George Orwell’s 1984, often reveal the ways in which changes in context lead to changed values being expressed in texts. Try to start with a more conceptual Thesis; what idea is going to be the focus of your essay (probably control and revolution), and only then bring in your text. This assertion is exemplified through an analytical comparison of both Metropolis and 1984, as both texts portray alternate perspectives on the themes of control and revolution. Lang, in his 1927 silent film Metropolis, foretells the ruin that will result from the aspiration for a capitalistic world while Orwell’s cautionary tale, 1984, provides a scathing critique of totalitarian regimes. Ultimately, both texts reflect the issues of control engendering revolution despite alternate contexts, thus allowing for an analytical comparison of both to provide an insight into the perpetuity of these concerns. Solid introduction with good links to the module, a slightly more conceptual approach would make it shine! ;D
   
In the 1927 film Metropolis, Fritz Lang extrapolates from his current context of Weimar Germany to provide a social commentary on the future if capitalistic industrialists continue to exercise control over the working class. Same as above, try to start every paragraph with something conceptual. EG - "Composers may extrapolates on issues of their contexts to provide a didactic warning on emerging social issues." -> And then this sentence slides right in afterwards. Lang reveals the aspect of control through Maria’s description of the construction of the Tower of Babel. When Maria says, “but the hands that built the tower of Babel, knew nothing of the dream”. Technique here? You can do better than description, and this is also heavily based on retell. The control exercised over the lower class is demonstrated through Lang’s application of synecdoche, as “hands” dehumanises the workers, framing them strictly as a means to an end. Better! Through this extended metaphor of the construction of the Tower of Babel, Lang directly attacks the totalitarian capitalists who subject workers to inhumane treatment as a means of creating capital and extracting revenue in 1920’s Weimar Germany while highlighting the exploitation that befell these workers who had no opportunity to work elsewhere as the capitalists monopolised all vacant jobs as only they ‘knew … of the dream’. Slow start, but rounded the paragraph effectively. Remember to conclude your paragraph effectively though, and make specific reference to the audience of Lang's context!

Comparably to Lang’s Metropolis, Orwell’s 1984 is imbued with the concept of control to criticise totalitarian regimes present during his own specific context. Good inter-textual comparison. Orwell presents this concept of control when Winston says, “The thought police moved always amongst them … eliminating the few individuals who were judged capable of becoming dangerous”. Technique? Don't just retell the text as analysis, you must focus on techniques. Orwell incorporates the symbolic allusion of the thought police throughout the novel, characterising them to be construed as a malevolent force fixated on the control of ‘thought criminals’ through methods such as silencing and ‘vaporising’. What does this reveal to the audience about totalitarianism? Orwell’s incorporation of ‘the thought police’ is reminiscent of totalitarian regimes such as the Nazis’ Gestapo and Stalinist Russia’s KGB, which both ‘vaporised’ anyone deemed ‘dangerous’, being anyone they could not control or anyone who would dissent, thus depicting the all encompassing nature of control within Orwell’s reality. Solid paragraph, same issues as above: Audience links and a proper conclusion are both needed.

Control in Metropolis and in 1984 operates divergently from one another. Interesting structural choice here. In Metropolis, control of the workers is engendered by Frederson’s capitalist utopia through the subjugation of workers, who become reliant on employment to survive, much like the workers in 1920’s Weimar Germany. Retell. Dissimilarly in 1984, control takes a more sinister tone as it seeps into all facets of life, being idiosyncrasies such as ‘whispers’ and ‘a look in the eye’. Retell. These minute details are the causes of numerous ‘vaporisations’, reminiscent of Nazi Germany’s Night of the Long Knives and Stalinist Russia’s Great purges.  Both these alternate portrayals of control are prerequisites for the two different versions of revolution presented. Some good contextual links, but this paragraph lacks rigour and analytical strength. It feels far weaker than your others..

Akin to Orwell’s 1984, Fritz Lang’s Metropolis is presented as a literary embodiment of Lang’s fear of capitalism acting as a nexus for economic control to foster, catalysing a revolution. This notion is exhibited during the Moloch scene where Freder witnesses the working class being swallowed by the machine. Retell. As the superimposition of Moloch is a subjective hallucination on behalf of Freder, Lang suggests that Freder has a repressed internal guilt towards the lower class as he resists the traditional 1920’s totalitarian capitalists modus operandi and sees the workers as more than an avenue for revenue. What does this show about capitalism?  Lang couples this with Freder’s sporadic, melodramatic actions in response to the deaths of the workers, again implying emotions of guilt and revolution towards capitalist industrialists who run Metropolis and who ran 1920’s Weimar Germany, catalysing Metropolis’ initial revolution. Retell.

Like Lang’s Metropolis, Orwell’s 1984 explores the ignition of revolution within a general society that is controlled in every facet of life, stemming from Orwell’s post WWII contextual concerns of the rise of totalitarianism. You are making some great links between context and the composers purpose, but I want you to link context to the techniques too. What choices have the composers made to portray issues of their context? Orwell purposefully incorporates tyrannical control to catalyse revolution when Syme says, “The proles are not human beings”. Retell, no technique. Orwell’s zoomorphic characterisation of the proles is utilised as they symbolise the unadulterated and primordial side of human nature, posing as a literary foil to the party, a resistance towards their authoritarianism and monopolisation of human expression. What does this reveal to the audience? Portrayed as a dormant form of revolution, O’Brien reifies the idea of this revolution when he says, “Your old idea that the proles will arrive and overthrow us”.  Retell. Winston’s ‘old idea’ of galvanising the proles contextually harmonises with the attitudes during WWII where German civilians became content under totalitarian leadership, however Orwell’s novel reflects reality as he criticises the inaction of ‘the proles’ as ‘If there is any hope’ for revolution, ‘it lies in the proles’.

It is in the denouement of the two texts that the distinct divergence between contexts occurs regarding control and revolution. Metropolis’ revolution under economic control ends with a sense of hope with a liberated Maria who unites Grot and Frederson through the empathic Freder, whereas in 1984’s final line, Winston’s proclamation of love for big brother is seen as a final, crushing defeat that suggests no hope for revolution exists under overwhelmingly powerful totalitarian regimes. I feel these shorter paragraphs feel quite out of place. While I know they are a method of comparison, they feel forced due to their length in comparison to the others.

An analytical comparison of both Lang’s film Metropolis and Orwell’s novel 1984 reveals that the composers’s respective contexts influences their choice of language forms and features along with the ideas and values being conveyed in each text. With regard to what issues specifically? What do they focus on? Both Lang’ Metropolis and Orwell’s 1984 demonstrate the idea that comparing texts through time allows for an enlightened understanding of the relationship between them, despite context, content and form. Ultimately, the texts display the timeless truth of oppressive, tyrannical control engendering revolution through both composers’ idiosyncratic, yet somewhat similar dystopian worlds. Solid conclusion on the whole, again, good links to module.

This is a great essay Jimmy, especially in how you bring in the contextual aspects of the module! You have a clear understanding of the contextual purpose of both composers, that is clear, and you have some great concepts and excellent textual knowledge. Great work on all counts!  ;D

Feel free to have a flick through my comments in the essay, I'll give you two big pieces of feedback with which to proceed  :)

First, improving quality of analysis. Right now, you are not connecting your analysis to the audience effectively, and often, using retell to communicate your ideas. For example:

Orwell presents this concept of control when Winston says, “The thought police moved always amongst them … eliminating the few individuals who were judged capable of becoming dangerous.

Here, you are simply using something that happened in the text to prove your concept. This isn't analytical, but it is an easy fix! Good analysis has three aspects, go to TEA:

- Technique: What technique has the composer used?
- Explain: Why did the composer use this technique? What were they trying to communicate? What aspect of context comes across?
- Audience: What does the audience learn about the concept as a result? What new understanding do we gain?

The sentence above, using these principles, could become (not a good example because the quote has no obvious technique, but I used alliteration to demonstrate):

This concept of control is accentuated through Orwell's use of alliteration in the description of his world space. “The thought police moved always amongst them," as the audience realises that totalitarianism ultimately threatens our personal privacy.

Technique, Example, Audience

Using this style will eliminate retell and guarantee you connect to the audience at all times  ;D

My other piece of feedback concerns your structure; those smaller paragraphs aren't as strong as your others, it creates a balance issue. I'd trim them and instead try to integrate the comparison throughout your other 4 paragraphs. The two short paragraphs interrupt the greater flow, and further, aren't quite enough to fulfil the comparative aspects of the module  ;D

So those are the two things for you to work on moving forward, I hope this helps!! Let me know if you need any clarification  ;D

sudodds

  • HSC Lecturer
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Part of the furniture
  • *******
  • Posts: 1753
  • "Seize the means of the HSC" ~ Vladimir Lenin
Re: English Advanced Essay Marking (Modules Only)
« Reply #448 on: July 26, 2016, 12:03:41 am »
Hi! Here is my module B essay if you would be able to have a look at it as well :) This was my other weaker area (16/20) that I want to sort out before trials. Thank you!

(btw I actually do have 15 posts now, they just don't seem to be showing up on the side :( If you go to my profile though it should have 15 because I know I needed another five to send this essay through :) )

Spoiler
Evaluate the effectiveness of Eliot’s exploration of the relationship between individuals and their world within his poetry. In your response discuss ‘The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock” and TWO other poems set for study.

Throughout his poetry, TS Eliot has made many comments and criticisms upon the dynamic relationship between the individual and their wider context, effectively explaining to his readership what he perceives to be the individual’s role within his contemporary society.  Greatly influenced by the modernist movement, TS Eliot presents to the reader a bleak outlook upon the state of modern society, and the oppressive hold it has upon an individual’s existence through the adoption of the key themes within his poetry – modernity, isolation and meaning. The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock demonstrates the pervasiveness of these ideas within Eliot’s poetry, with the ideas further established through the related poems Journey of the Magi and Rhapsody of a Windy Night.

Eliot effectively explores the impact of modernity upon his contemporary society, and its relation to the lives of individuals, evident within his poems The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock and Rhapsody of a Windy Night. Like many poets of the 20th Century, Eliot was greatly influenced by Modernism, a socio-philosophical movement which sought the replacement of Romantic optimism for pessimistic cynicism as a reaction to the Industrial Revolution and the horrors of the First World War. It was an effort to portray the truth about humanity during a time where humanity, according to modernists, appeared to be at its lowest point, and this is evident within Eliot’s poetry.
The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock presents to the reader a modern urban landscape (the typical setting for many of his poems) of “half-deserted streets” and “cheap hotels,” which serves to introduce Eliot’s perception of the modern world as a mundane ‘wasteland’ that carries through the rest of the poem. Thus, the character of Prufrock acts as a vehicle in which Eliot can represent this further, through a melancholy stream of consciousness that demonstrates his discontent with modern society. This is evident through lines such as “streets that follow like a tedious argument,” which emphasizes the infinitely repetitive and mundane nature of his world, which enables his restlessness to find any meaning or purpose within his life, leading him to his isolation and detachment. The use of enjambment further conveys the labyrinthine, never-ending spatiality of the city and evolves Prufrock’s ‘stream of consciousness’, techniques evident within many of Eliot’s other poems that convey a similar critique of modernity.
Within Rhapsody of a Windy Night, Eliot presents a similarly bleak outlook upon what he perceives to be a decaying society. Within the poem, Eliot describes society through the metaphor “a broken spring in a factory yard, /Rust that clings to the form that the strength has left.” The spring symbolizes Eliot’s world, with the rust of modernity promoting the decay of a strong and true society. Therefore, it is evident that through The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock and Rhapsody on a Windy Night Eliot effectively explores the impact of modernity upon the relationship between the individual and society, through presenting it as a mundane and oppressive force. This leads many readers to, gain insight into Prufrock and other key characters within Eliot’s poem and to recognize their isolation and detachment.

Eliot effectively explores the impact of isolation upon the relationship between an individual and their world through his poems The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock and Rhapsody of a Windy Night. Within almost all of his poems, Eliot presents to the reader an isolated individual, detached from his world. Prufrock’s inability to make decisions in fear of societal judgement – particularly from “the women [who] come and go” – leads to an inability to make connection. His intense fear of human connection stems from the fear of his own vulnerability, the paradoxical element to Prufrock, as he strives for isolation as a means of security, but thus leads him to despair. His isolation is apparent through Eliot’s effective use of imagery within the poem, whereby he creates an atmosphere of loneliness and division between Prufrock and his world. Prufrock describes himself as “a pair of ragged claws / Scuttling across the floors of silent seas,” watching “lonely me in shirt-sleeves, leaning out of windows.” This lonely image presents Prufrock as an even more isolated individual than the men he observes, for all he can do is quietly watch them as they continue to live their mundane lives.
Loneliness and isolation are also a key theme within Rhapsody of a Windy Night, whereby Eliot presents the isolation and loneliness of humanity within the modern world.
Within Rhapsody of a Windy Night, the narrator, who Eliot also presents through a stream of consciousness, wonders the desolate streets alone at night, with only his thoughts and memories to keep him company. The isolated atmosphere is presented through the use of time as a running motif throughout the poem. Almost every stanza begins with Eliot stating a time in the early hours of the morning, the first being “twelve o’clock,” the cusp between one day and the next. The use of time effectively conveys the narrator’s isolation, as these times fall during periods when almost everyone is asleep and therefore the narrator is left alone. Along with this, the reanimation of inanimate objects, such as the the street lamp who “sputtered” and “muttered,” representing humanity’s breakdown in communication, whereby ironically the inanimate objects are the most alive figures within the poem.
Therefore, it is evident that through The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock and Rhapsody of a Windy Night, Eliot effectively discusses the impact of isolation upon the relationship between an individual and their world, through presenting it as a barrier inhibiting true connection.

Eliot effectively explores the impact of meaning and purpose within an individuals’ relationship with their world through his poems The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock and The Journey of the Magi, particularly in regards to the spiritual journey of their narrators. The struggle to find meaning within a meaningless world is a common element within many of Eliot’s poems, particularly within The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock, which features the search for meaning of a profoundly fallible human being. “Do I dare / Disturb the universe? “Throughout the poem, Prufrock ponders upon great philosophical questions pertaining to his role within his world and the wider universe, demonstrating Prufrock’s desperation to find a greater purpose for his existence. It is evident within the poem through Eliot’s inclusion of many other rhetorical questions such as “So how should I presume,” “And how should I begin?” and “Shall I part my hair behind? Do I dare to eat a peach?”  that Prufrock over-analyses the mundane situations of his life, causing him great anxiety as his inability to make decisions leads to his feelings of worthlessness and meaninglessness. Prufrock feels as if he lacks a purpose, however is too afraid to change this. Therefore, through The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock, Eliot effectively explores the role of purpose within individuals lives, and how it affects their relationship with their wider context. However, Eliot does not present purpose and meaning as something unattainable, as evident through many of the religious elements of his poetry, which in the predominant theme of The Journey of the Magi.
A critical moment within Eliot’s life was his conversion to Christianity, which informed many of his ideas and frequently featured within many of his poems. The Journey of the Magi is a reflective text upon religion, and features many biblical allusions, particularly in regards to the birth of Christ. “For a journey, and such a long journey.” Despite the “long journey,” Eliot provides his readers with a finality for the search for meaning, which he perceives to be his religious epiphany and conversion to Christianity. This is evident within the final stanza, where the narrator comments upon “alien people clutching their gods,” demonstrating that after his conversion he is no longer “clutching” for a sense of purpose like those around him, but instead has found his true meaning in God. Therefore, it is evident that through The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock and The Journey of the Magi Eliot effectively explores the role and importance of meaning within the lives of individuals, in that it provides a sense of purpose and control against the mundanity and pressures of modern society.


Therefore, through his poems, particularly The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock, and the related The Journey of the Magi and Rhapsody of a Windy Night, Eliot presents his key themes of modernity, isolation and meaning in order to comment and critique upon the current state of modern society and the psyche of humanity. Through this, he effectively communicates his ideas and values upon the relationship between the individual and society, and thus enables his reader with a new perspective upon our role in this world.


FREE HISTORY EXTENSION LECTURE - CLICK HERE FOR INFO!

2016 HSC: Modern History (18th in NSW) | History Extension (2nd place in the HTA Extension History Essay Prize) | Ancient History | Drama | English Advanced | Studies of Religion I | Economics

ATAR: 97.80

Studying a Bachelor of Communications: Media Arts and Production at UTS 😊

Looking for a history tutor? I'm ya girl! Feel free to send me a PM if you're interested!

jamonwindeyer

  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 10149
  • The lurker from the north.
Re: English Advanced Essay Marking (Modules Only)
« Reply #449 on: July 26, 2016, 12:44:32 am »
Hi! Here is my module B essay if you would be able to have a look at it as well :) This was my other weaker area (16/20) that I want to sort out before trials. Thank you!

(btw I actually do have 15 posts now, they just don't seem to be showing up on the side :( If you go to my profile though it should have 15 because I know I needed another five to send this essay through :) )


Hey Sudodds! Unfortunately, it goes off the number on the side there! Posts in certain parts of the site don't qualify into your "post count" for this purpose (including the Forum Games, the usual culprit)  :-\  sorry about that! You only need two more though, let me know when you hit it and I'll add you to the list  ;D