Hi Guys,Actually(kind of) failed this piece so hard!

The prompt was:
Should the driving age be raised to twenty-one?Okay,
SO,
I wrote this in like 20 minutes....
I don't know what happened, I knew my ideas, arguments.
I just blanked out.
Had no idea how to express them, I guess.
A theory for why this happened would be:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
So, one of my tooth was loose, my dad tried to get it out.
It legit killed so my dad gave me a break so I could rest for a bit.
I decided to write my essay in the break!

Worst decision of the week.
So, I couldn't concentrate at ALL on my essay, and the prompt was really easy, I thought of ideas right away. Just like, couldn't put them down on paper, I guess.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Another possible theory would be that I felt like I was repeating myself too much.
As in, like a sentence format I used in my last persuasive essay, I would think of using that again, but then I would think it's bad too overuse the same thing.
Then struggle to think of another one, when I finally do, I've wasted like 30 seconds on a sentence that's not even half decent.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Any suggestions?
Overall, I'm all round confused on how to do the rebuttal paragraph.
Any suggestions, like a format? Would make my day.

Anyway, here is the essay, read it and cringe with me.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
The question of whether the driving age be raised to twenty-one has received significant attention among the public. If the driving age is raised to twenty-one, the action will form a safer driving environment, reduce our carbon footprint and will not be unjust to the car companies. Hence, the driving age should be raised to twenty-one.
Firstly, increasing the driving age to twenty one will reduce road related accidents. When one is eighteen, they may commit dangerous and unwise decisions, while driving. Such hazardous actions include, texting smoking and a lack of attention while driving. It is likely a large proportion of road accidents are sourced from the younger population. Therefore, if the driving age is raised to twenty-one, it will lower the amount of accidents on the road.
Secondly, increasing the driving age to twenty-one will force some to use public transport, ultimately helping the environment. Public transport is a more efficient and environmentally friendly way of travelling compared to cars. If the driving age is increased to twenty-one, damaging carbon emissions will be reduced.
Lastly, while some may state that such change will adversely effect car companies, due to less people willing to purchase cars, the amount of people doing so will be too insignificant to be a issue. Increasing the driving age to twenty-one will not be severely damage car companies.
Driving is a task requiring lots of responsibility. Increasing the driving age to twenty-one will create an overall safer driving environment, will benefit the environment and will not be unfair to car companies. Therefore, the driving age should definitely be raised to twenty-one.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Spoiler
[/move]