Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

September 25, 2025, 03:24:59 pm

Author Topic: Referencing or Subsitution?  (Read 1710 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

GGWP VCAA

  • Trailblazer
  • *
  • Posts: 39
  • Respect: 0
  • School: A School
  • School Grad Year: 2015
Referencing or Subsitution?
« on: September 02, 2015, 08:03:15 am »
0
One of the most debatable questions in Language ( according to my teacher anyways), but what is the difference between referencing (anaphoric) and substitution?

PS. The use of a pronoun in referencing is one difference that my teacher talked about, but im still not sure.

TIA

kayoak

  • Victorian
  • Fresh Poster
  • *
  • Posts: 4
  • Respect: 0
  • School Grad Year: 2015
Re: Referencing or Subsitution?
« Reply #1 on: September 24, 2015, 07:34:03 am »
+2
To my knowledge, anaphoric referencing only refers (hehe) to the substitution of a lexeme with a pronoun that comes after the original, ie. Sally was happy. She had cake to eat.
The other type of referencing, cataphoric, would be in a sentence like 'She was so happy, Sally ate her cake in one gulp.'

I was under the impression that substitution was more of an umbrella term that indicates the replacement of one lexeme with one or more other lexemes, ie. both anaphoric and cataphoric references as well as something like 'Sally the Labrador was hungry. Barking, the dog licked her owner.'

I hope I haven't mixed anything up, but that's what I believe is the difference - if any other forum members would like to correct me, feel free! And good luck for ENL this year :)
2014: Mathematical Methods, Physics
2015: Chemistry, Biology, English Language, French
2016 - 2020: Monash MBBS

dmitridr

  • Victorian
  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 172
  • VCE English Language Tutor
  • Respect: +38
Re: Referencing or Subsitution?
« Reply #2 on: September 30, 2015, 02:18:18 pm »
0
To my knowledge, anaphoric referencing only refers (hehe) to the substitution of a lexeme with a pronoun that comes after the original, ie. Sally was happy. She had cake to eat.
The other type of referencing, cataphoric, would be in a sentence like 'She was so happy, Sally ate her cake in one gulp.'

I was under the impression that substitution was more of an umbrella term that indicates the replacement of one lexeme with one or more other lexemes, ie. both anaphoric and cataphoric references as well as something like 'Sally the Labrador was hungry. Barking, the dog licked her owner.'

I hope I haven't mixed anything up, but that's what I believe is the difference - if any other forum members would like to correct me, feel free! And good luck for ENL this year :)

Yes, I would agree with this. Substitution is different to synonyms and referencing in that substitution replaces whole words with more generic terms that are not generally synonymous to that word. For example, "Do you play tennis on the weekends?" - "Yes I do"

In this case, "do" functions as a substitution of 'play' but can ONLY be understood in that given context!

I hope that helps!
Winter EL Workshop on Unit 4 AOS 1! Click here!

Need VCE English Language tutoring? Offering personal and group tutoring! See more details here!

Require a VCE tutor for any subject? - Click here!

Learn the entire VCE English Language 3/4 course inside out, in an interactive & engaging way! Get 25% OFF the full price today: Click here.