Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

June 16, 2024, 01:02:37 pm

Author Topic: My thread of questions  (Read 26168 times)  Share 

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

TrueTears

  • TT
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 16363
  • Respect: +667
Re: My thread of questions
« Reply #90 on: September 27, 2009, 10:09:40 pm »
0
PhD @ MIT (Economics).

Interested in asset pricing, econometrics, and social choice theory.

khalil

  • Guest
Re: My thread of questions
« Reply #91 on: September 27, 2009, 10:25:36 pm »
0
Is this for spesh?

TrueTears

  • TT
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 16363
  • Respect: +667
Re: My thread of questions
« Reply #92 on: September 27, 2009, 10:26:09 pm »
0
No.
PhD @ MIT (Economics).

Interested in asset pricing, econometrics, and social choice theory.

khalil

  • Guest
Re: My thread of questions
« Reply #93 on: September 27, 2009, 10:28:23 pm »
0
Is it in the Essentials methods text?

TrueTears

  • TT
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 16363
  • Respect: +667
Re: My thread of questions
« Reply #94 on: September 27, 2009, 10:28:52 pm »
0
For chain rule - yes.
PhD @ MIT (Economics).

Interested in asset pricing, econometrics, and social choice theory.

QuantumJG

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1748
  • Applied Mathematics Student at UoM
  • Respect: +82
Re: My thread of questions
« Reply #95 on: September 27, 2009, 10:37:42 pm »
0
Why does 0! = 1?

Factorial (n!) is defined as the continued multiplication of 1...n (I.e. n! = 1*2*3*4*...*(n-2)*(n-1)*n, where n>0.

0! = 1, since, the product of no numbers is defined as equalling 1.

The only thing you need to know in maths methods is that 0! = 1. Even if that is required?

I hope in university I'll see how this is actually proved.
2008: Finished VCE

2009 - 2011: Bachelor of Science (Mathematical Physics)

2012 - 2014: Master of Science (Applied Mathematics/Mathematical Physics)

2016 - 2018: Master of Engineering (Civil)

Semester 1:[/b] Engineering Mechanics, Fluid Mechanics, Engineering Risk Analysis, Sustainable Infrastructure Engineering

Semester 2:[/b] Earth Processes for Engineering, Engineering Materials, Structural Theory and Design, Systems Modelling and Design

kamil9876

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1943
  • Respect: +109
Re: My thread of questions
« Reply #96 on: September 27, 2009, 10:48:42 pm »
0
True, it's a convention so that things work nicely. As Quantum pointed out it's the product of no numbers and this can be a useful concept in certain problems (similairly like x^0=1 for all x besides 0). Say for example I have the number 10, and i want to multiply it by the first 3 consecutive numbers, I get 10*1*2*3. If i want to multiply it by the first n consecutive numbers I get 10*n!. But if i want to multiply it by no numbers(0 numbers) the number won't change, still be 10, hence it has the same affect as multiplying by 1. Also, it makes the binomial formula work well and things like that since there are is only one way of choosing nothing( similairly because there is only one way of choosing what not to choose in order to choose nothing).
Voltaire: "There is an astonishing imagination even in the science of mathematics ... We repeat, there is far more imagination in the head of Archimedes than in that of Homer."

ryley

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 239
  • Respect: +2
Re: My thread of questions
« Reply #97 on: September 27, 2009, 11:06:14 pm »
0
If you want a more formal definition, this is way I was taught it (no, the following is not in methods).

2008: 3/4: Biology[41]
2009: 3/4: English[37], Chemistry[43], Methods(CAS)[46], Physics[39], Specialist[46]
ENTER: 98.85
B.Sc(Applied Maths) @ Melbourne Uni

khalil

  • Guest
Re: My thread of questions
« Reply #98 on: September 29, 2009, 10:11:02 pm »
0


Would this transformation be a dilation from the x or y axis.
Cos' when the graph is transformed it it 4/x

Flaming_Arrow

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Superstar
  • ******
  • Posts: 2506
  • Respect: +16
Re: My thread of questions
« Reply #99 on: September 29, 2009, 10:16:03 pm »
0
dilation of factor 4 from the y axis
2010: Commerce @ UoM

khalil

  • Guest
Re: My thread of questions
« Reply #100 on: September 30, 2009, 12:42:00 am »
0
Why not from the x-axis? It is dilated by 4 hence new equation 4/x

TrueTears

  • TT
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 16363
  • Respect: +667
Re: My thread of questions
« Reply #101 on: September 30, 2009, 12:47:56 am »
0


Would this transformation be a dilation from the x or y axis.
Cos' when the graph is transformed it it 4/x
Let be the coordinates of the transformed graph.





Thus the graph of has gone to



and

Thus is mapped onto

So this is a dilation of factor 4 from the y axis.
PhD @ MIT (Economics).

Interested in asset pricing, econometrics, and social choice theory.

kamil9876

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1943
  • Respect: +109
Re: My thread of questions
« Reply #102 on: September 30, 2009, 12:50:21 am »
0


Voltaire: "There is an astonishing imagination even in the science of mathematics ... We repeat, there is far more imagination in the head of Archimedes than in that of Homer."

khalil

  • Guest
Re: My thread of questions
« Reply #103 on: September 30, 2009, 08:52:56 am »
0
Then why does this work out also?












« Last Edit: September 30, 2009, 08:54:57 am by khalil »

kamil9876

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1943
  • Respect: +109
Re: My thread of questions
« Reply #104 on: September 30, 2009, 12:27:47 pm »
0
Note: The possible tranformations from one function to another is not unique.

e.g:

y=x^2 to y=4x^2

could be seen as dilating 4 from x axis. However by expressing the second function as y=(2x)^2 you get dilation by factor of 1/2 from y axis. Different transformations that yield same result.

A more simple and intuitive example:

y=x to y=(x+2)  could also be seen as y=x to (y-2)=x.  This means that Moving the line y=x 2 units left has the same affect as moving the line y=x 2 units up(draw this to see yourself). Hence different transformations can give same result.
Voltaire: "There is an astonishing imagination even in the science of mathematics ... We repeat, there is far more imagination in the head of Archimedes than in that of Homer."