Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

September 26, 2026, 07:17:07 pm

Author Topic: Melbourne Postgrad Med vs Monash Undergrad Med  (Read 20182 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Splash-Tackle-Flail

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 797
  • diagnosed with bangali-fever
  • Respect: +94
Re: Melbourne Postgrad Med vs Monash Undergrad Med
« Reply #15 on: December 18, 2015, 03:10:05 pm »
+1
Thank you so much Splash-Tackle-Fail! I'll do that then.
Congrats on your perfect ATAR btw :)

Thanks-you too! good luck for the Monash MMI; if it's anything like the UOM MMI (I'm assuming Monash one is a lot harder lol)- you'll be just fine!
VCE: Done!
2016:  Monash University, Bachelor of Medicine/Bachelor of Surgery (Honours)
Currently offering Methods and Chemistry tutoring for 2016! (Currently full for 2016)
Splash's Life Tips :)
How to be the one who knocks

heart

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 230
  • Respect: +11
Re: Melbourne Postgrad Med vs Monash Undergrad Med
« Reply #16 on: December 18, 2015, 03:58:48 pm »
+1
In the little that I have to offer, I can assure you that I wasted my undergrad years and didn't take it seriously. Having the end of one degree and beginning of another at the age of 21 really allows you to start afresh and actually work like an adult.

Same experience for me.
ATAR: 99.70 Methods [48] | Chemistry [49] | Specialist [41] | Further [46] | English [42] | Biology [44] | Literature [35]
Melbourne University Bachelor of Biomedicine (Biochemistry) 2013-2015
Monash University Bachelor of Medicine and Bachelor of Surgery (Honours) 2016-2019

Stick

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 3774
  • Sticky. :P
  • Respect: +467
Re: Melbourne Postgrad Med vs Monash Undergrad Med
« Reply #17 on: December 18, 2015, 04:15:33 pm »
+2
In the little that I have to offer, I can assure you that I wasted my undergrad years and didn't take it seriously. Having the end of one degree and beginning of another at the age of 21 really allows you to start afresh and actually work like an adult. I'm really glad that I ended up in a postgraduate pathway, and yes it is at least one extra year, but that's of almost no importance at this stage anyway...

Congratulations!

In a similar but different fashion, I'm glad I picked the pathway I'm currently on simply because I didn't have the maturity at the end of high school to start a medical degree. The amount of personal development I've gone through in the past two years has been extraordinary, and while I'm still not 100% sure on what I want to do, I feel I'll be much more ready for medicine should that be the path I take. Granted, I was very unsure about what career I wanted to do at the end of Year 12, so this may not necessarily apply to the OP.
2017-2020: Doctor of Medicine - The University of Melbourne
2014-2016: Bachelor of Biomedicine - The University of Melbourne

Syndicate

  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 797
  • Hard work beats Talent
  • Respect: +139
Re: Melbourne Postgrad Med vs Monash Undergrad Med
« Reply #18 on: January 02, 2016, 10:38:17 am »
0
Hey guys!

I was having a look at this page, which states all the differences between Monash and UoM Medicine  :)

http://www.medentry.edu.au/umat/entry/medicine-at-monash-or-melbourne

Hopefully it clears up, all your concern (it did for me)  :D
« Last Edit: January 02, 2016, 10:43:16 am by Syndicate »
2017: Chemistry | Physics | English | Specialist Mathematics | Mathematics Methods
2018-2020 : Bachelor of Biomedicine at University of Melbourne

Physics Guide 2017

Alter

  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 917
  • socratic junkie wannabe
  • Respect: +341
Re: Melbourne Postgrad Med vs Monash Undergrad Med
« Reply #19 on: January 02, 2016, 11:01:07 am »
+8
Hey guys!

I was having a look at this page, which states all the differences between Monash and UoM Medicine  :)

http://www.medentry.edu.au/umat/entry/medicine-at-monash-or-melbourne

Hopefully it clears up, all your concern (it did for me)  :D

That website doesn't really look at the differences, it's just a campaign for people to go to Monash (it says "this is why we think Monash is better" lol). It doesn't take a genius to figure out that a company focusing on selling UMAT preparation material (UMAT is only for undergrad med) wants to encourage people to do the UMAT instead of the GAMSAT. By doing so, they'll make prospective med students feel obliged to try out for undergrad med just so that they pay Medentry. This is a pretty cynical outlook, I admit, but you need to understand the goal of Medentry in writing this article. In fact, many of the points in that article are pretty biased, so I implore you not to be falsely convinced that the MBBS is decidedly better, when they are two very different routes. It's best not to look at MD vs. MBBS as two comparable pathways, because what degree may be better for some people might not be the better pathway for another.
« Last Edit: January 02, 2016, 11:03:36 am by Alter »
2016–2018: Bachelor of Biomedicine (Neuroscience), The University of Melbourne
2019–2022: Doctor of Medicine, The University of Melbourne

Syndicate

  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 797
  • Hard work beats Talent
  • Respect: +139
Re: Melbourne Postgrad Med vs Monash Undergrad Med
« Reply #20 on: January 02, 2016, 11:06:31 am »
0
That website doesn't really look at the differences, it's just a campaign for people to go to Monash (it says "this is why we think Monash is better" lol). It doesn't take a genius to figure out that a company focusing on selling UMAT preparation material (UMAT is only for undergrad med) wants to encourage people to do the UMAT instead of the GAMSAT. By doing so, they'll make prospective med students feel obliged to try out for undergrad med just so that they pay Medentry. This is a pretty cynical outlook, I admit, but you need to understand the goal of Medentry in writing this article. In fact, many of the points in that article are pretty biased, so I implore you not to be falsely convinced that the MBBS is decidedly better, when they are two very different routes. It's best not to look at MD vs. MBBS as two comparable pathways, because what degree may be better for some people might not be the better pathway for another.

Yeah, I was mainly looking at the melbourne model (you know, how they want more money and all that) and how long it takes to gain the final med degree  :P
2017: Chemistry | Physics | English | Specialist Mathematics | Mathematics Methods
2018-2020 : Bachelor of Biomedicine at University of Melbourne

Physics Guide 2017

pi

  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 14348
  • Doctor.
  • Respect: +2376
Re: Melbourne Postgrad Med vs Monash Undergrad Med
« Reply #21 on: January 02, 2016, 11:10:07 am »
+5
Medentry is a highly biased source.

Shenz0r

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1875
  • Respect: +410
Re: Melbourne Postgrad Med vs Monash Undergrad Med
« Reply #22 on: January 02, 2016, 11:28:49 am »
+13
Just be wary about sourcing things from Medentry because they do have a financial interest in trying to push undergrad med over postgrad.

Quote
Our view is that Monash school leaver entry is far superior for several reasons including:

1. No guarantee: Melbourne Graduate medicine does NOT have guaranteed places in Medicine, even though the university claims that it has. Even those who obtain an ATAR of 99.95 have to maintain certain GPA to progress to medicine after their first degree! There have been many students misled, disappointed and angry that the 'guaranteed' place is really no guarantee at all - unfortunately they discover it too late: after finishing their Biomedicine degree.

Chancellors scholars do have to maintain a certain average at uni but it quite low and very achievable - only very few chancellors will have their guaranteed spot rescinded.

Quote
2. More stress and uncertainty: You have just finished a hard slog for your final high school exams. Do you really want to continue to do that for another 3 to 4 years? And you have to live with the pressure and uncertainty that you may not get in, in spite of your hard work. Only those with high GPAs have a chance of getting in to graduate entry medicine.

True, there is more uncertainty to deal with, most likely for longer too. But 3-4 years fly by very fast and you do get used to the workload at university, its not like you will be stressed/anxious all the time for the next few years.

Quote
3. The dreaded GAMSAT: To get into Melbourne medicine, you will also need to sit the dreaded 6 hour GAMSAT test and do well, to have a chance of getting into Melbourne graduate medicine.

Dumb point. You get used to sitting long exams anyway. And a lot of people (like myself) found it easier than the UMAT.

Quote
4. Choices restricted: For graduate entry, you can only apply to one university (with six preferences) and will be interviewed by only one through the GEMSAS. Medical schools have colluded so that it makes their job of selection easier. With school leaver entry, there are no such restrictions.

What? This is misleading as fuck. When you apply for graduate entry, you interview at one university but even if you get rejected from that uni, you get passed down to your lower preferences and you can still get an offer without being interviewed (eg if you interviewed at Melbourne, which was your first preference, your interview scores get uploaded onto the central GEMSAS database and you can still get an offer at Deakin). It operates like VTAC. Medentry makes it sound like you only get one shot at one uni, which is utter bullshit.

Quote
5. Plan B: If you pursue Biomedicine at Melbourne and are then unable to get into medicine, you will have very limited career options (other than a research career which has little job security)

Fair point. That is why you pick Science instead, unless you have a thing for biomedical research.

Quote
6. Financial reasons: For those who like to look at things rationally, it takes at least two more years of study to do medicine at Melbourne. The average lifetime earnings of doctors in private practice is about $300,000 per year (Source: Australian Doctor 22 July 2011). So by giving up Monash Medicine, you are effectively losing half a million dollars. Plus there is the cost of study – being at university for at least two more years.

2 years is really nothing in the grand scheme of things, especially in medicine where many people will fail when they are specialising anyway.

Quote
7. Length of training: To become a fully qualified specialist, after graduation you will need to train for at least seven years further. The Melbourne university degree will prolong your time training for even longer.

See last point.

Quote
8. After graduating in medicine, once you have chosen the specialty you wish to pursue, you will need to sit exams while working as a Registrar. You will find this last hurdle easier to get through when you are younger (eg by going to Monash) rather than when you are older with family commitments. Studying for exams is less daunting when you are younger for several other reasons.

Perhaps a valid point, but if you can get into graduate medicine soon after finishing undergrad you shouldnt be too disadvantaged.

Quote
9. Focussed training: Some of the subjects that you will be studying in the Biomedicine degree may seem irrelevant to you, as it is not focussed on medicine. Monash university offers focussed medical training and patient contact from week one.

Obviously, because biomedicine is not a medical degree. Comparing apples and oranges.

Quote
10. Most professionals will tell you that real learning takes place when you start work, not at university. Most of what universities teach is irrelevant to real world of work and they teach it because that is all academics know. Hence the adage “Those who can, do; those who can’t teach!”. University is a place for fun and five years of fun is enough for most people!

I would rather stay at uni a tad longer to be honest. :P

Quote
11. Prestige: In Australia, which university you go to doesn’t count as much as in the USA. This is particularly so with medicine, because patients are more concerned about your bed-side manner, diagnostic skills etc. Even if you wish to work overseas, once you get a registration as Medical Practitioner with AHPRA (all medical graduates get this), it makes no difference which university you went to.

Valid point. There is no difference.

Quote
12. Through attracting better students, Monash is dramatically improving its lead over Melbourne in medical school prestige. There is anecdotal evidence that Monash medicine graduates perform better in terms of career prospects and their ability to get into ‘competitive’ specialties. Please see Medical schools ranking.

Just be careful about this, anecdotal evidence is not the most reliable and medical school rankings might also be influenced by other things such as research etc, not just the quality of their alumni

Quote
13. Increasingly the prizes awarded to medical students by the Royal Colleges (eg RACP/RACS) are being won by Monash students with Melbourne students further lagging behind every year.

Not sure if they can really back up this claim, there is no source given.

Quote
14. Misleading MD: The so-called Melbourne MD is misleadingly promoted as a superior degree. It is no different to MBBS degrees offered by other medical schools and you will have no career advantages. The misleading use of ‘MD’ title by Melbourne University has been widely condemned by leading academics and government bodies.

Yeah, that is true. MD = MBBS = BMBS = they are all the same.

Quote
15. Many people wrongly assume that because its an MD degree, the duration of their subsequent training is reduced. Melbourne University is unethically aiding and abetting this misunderstanding. The so called MD does NOT reduce your further training by even ONE DAY.

Yeah, after university the length of your subsequent training is really just dictated by 1) yourself and how eager you are to specialise and 2) how long it takes for you to complete the training program. The degree you did, whether its MD or MBBS is irrelevant.

Quote
16. Uncertainty of career choice: After commencing at Monash, in the unlikely event that you feel Medicine is not for you (the drop out rate is less than 1%), you can always drop out after a year or two and pursue another degree with prior learning credits.

Yup, that is true.

Quote
17. Travel distance: Some students who live in the north are put off by the distance required to travel to Monash. But remember that you go to University at the Clayton campus only for the first two years. For the remaining three years you are being trained in hospitals – you don’t go to to the university campus at all.

At Melbourne, you are at the Parkville campus for one year. For the next three years you will be in hospitals (Inner East zone has Epworth, St. Vs, RMH and Austin, North/West zone has Northern and Western hospitals, and then there is a rural zone).

Quote
18. College experience: Many students, even those who live near Monash, find it convenient to live in the halls of residence provided by Monash to experience college life for at least a year or two.

So do Melbourne students...?

Quote
19. Real reasons: There are at least three (real, as opposed to those peddled by the University) reasons why Melbourne has chosen to ape the US graduate entry model. First, by keeping the students at university for two more years, income from fees is increased (University gets an additional $60,000 from each student). Second, due to government policy, Melbourne is able to charge full fee ($55,000 per year) for their courses but is prohibited from doing so if it is a school leaver entry program. The university is therefore able to increase their income by about 70%. Third, by getting students into their Biomedicine program, they are able to increase the flagging enrolments in their science programs. Since the demand to get into medicine is high, the university is able to lure a large number of students (up to 1000) to commence their Biomedicine program, most of who hope to get into medicine. So it is a nice cash cow for the university, earning a massive $100 million dollars a year. Many students after completion will be unable to get into Med or get jobs and will choose to stay on to pursue higher degrees. This not only further increases the income but they get slave labour (postgraduate research students) to boost their research profile and hence their international ranking.

This author is pretty much saying look how selfish Melbourne is, all they want is your money, they dont actually care about their students. They are really trying to bash Melbourne lol. Most of this is irrelevant for deciding between the MD/MBBS, all you need to be aware of is that some spots in the Melbourne MD are FFP. However, it is not like you are forced to pick FFP against your will. Only people who tick yes to an FFP spot actually get them, so just dont consider taking one if you dont want to!

Quote
20. Due to the fact that GAMSAT entry doctors are older (about 6 years older on average),  they are likely to choose specialties which is easier to get in, and require shorter training, such as General Practice. UMAT entry doctors are more likely to choose competitive specialties such as Dermatology, Ophthalmology, Neurosurgery, Gastroenterology, because time is on their side, among other reasons. There is evidence that graduate entry doctors (GAMSAT route) are more likely to choose general Practice.

I would like to see evidence for this claim.

Quote
21. Competition for everything is increasing in all aspects of life (eg Registrar positions), so the quicker you finish your training, the better it is for you.

When knowledge is so freely available these days, one would expect the time taken to train as a professional should reduce, not increase, as Melbourne university is trying to do.

But you may ask, what if I want to study wider range of subjects or get research experience? Well, you can gain research experience by doing a Masters degree after Monash medicine; and you can learn the subjects that interest you any time, at any university, by enrolling in summer or single subject courses.

In summary, Monash (school leaver entry) medicine is good for you, and Melbourne (graduate entry) medicine is good for the university.

You can really see the bias dripping off your screen here lol. You can also get research experience before you do medicine if you want, its up to you. Its just a matter of whether you feel comfortable dabbling in things that pique your interest before or after medicine.

EDIT: Also did a quick google search of the author and all you can find are UMAT/Medentry links. Take that what you will.
« Last Edit: January 02, 2016, 01:15:37 pm by Shenz0r »
2012 ATAR: 99.20
2013-2015: Bachelor of Biomedicine (Microbiology/Immunology: Infections and Immunity) at The University of Melbourne
2016-2019: Doctor of Medicine (MD4) at The University of Melbourne

pi

  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 14348
  • Doctor.
  • Respect: +2376
Re: Melbourne Postgrad Med vs Monash Undergrad Med
« Reply #23 on: January 02, 2016, 12:35:27 pm »
+1
At Melbourne, you are at the Parkville campus for one year. For the next three years you will be in hospitals (Inner East zone has Epworth, St. Vs, RMH and Austin, North/West zone has Northern and Western hospitals, and then there is a rural zone).

Can't wait to see the Epworth MD2's later this year, finally I'll be able to make some comparisons between unis hahaha :P

Russ

  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 8442
  • Respect: +661
Re: Melbourne Postgrad Med vs Monash Undergrad Med
« Reply #24 on: January 02, 2016, 02:37:52 pm »
+1
I don't believe that anybody should listen to a word MedEntry have to say on the topic of medical school entry, especially when they claim to have the best interests of students at heart.

You can review umat[dot]net[dot]au and form your own opinions if you so wish.

Syndicate

  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 797
  • Hard work beats Talent
  • Respect: +139
Re: Melbourne Postgrad Med vs Monash Undergrad Med
« Reply #25 on: January 02, 2016, 03:14:14 pm »
+1
I don't believe that anybody should listen to a word MedEntry have to say on the topic of medical school entry, especially when they claim to have the best interests of students at heart.

You can review umat[dot]net[dot]au and form your own opinions if you so wish.

yes, I would agree! It felt quite that medenetry is biased, as they didn't state 1 single good thing about studying Medicine at Uni Melb
« Last Edit: January 02, 2016, 07:32:38 pm by Syndicate »
2017: Chemistry | Physics | English | Specialist Mathematics | Mathematics Methods
2018-2020 : Bachelor of Biomedicine at University of Melbourne

Physics Guide 2017

zsteve

  • ATAR Notes VIC MVP - 2016
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 748
  • The LORD is my shepherd, I shall not want - Ps. 23
  • Respect: +218
Re: Melbourne Postgrad Med vs Monash Undergrad Med
« Reply #26 on: January 02, 2016, 07:14:41 pm »
0
Hi everyone,

Just wanted to get some opinions and thoughts about these two courses to help me decide which one to choose.

I am keen to do med and for the majority of my VCE I've been hoping to get a place in Monash's undergrad MBBS course. However, I was fortunate enough to get a high ATAR, which has granted me the guaranteed option to go through Melbourne Uni and do the MD there, an option I hadn't really considered previously since it is much more difficult and uncertain.

So right now I'm in a luxury position of trying to decide whether I should take the Melbourne graduate path or continue pursuing the Monash undergrad path. Do any of you guys have anything you can input on this? If you've had to make this decision too, I'd really like to hear your reasons for choosing one over the other. Any feedback would be greatly appreciated!

Thanks so much :)

I guess I'm in the same position ATAR-wise this year, so this was my position on it:
I really wanted to broaden myself first before launching into a narrow career such as medicine. Not that I wasn't interested in pursuing medicine as a career, but rather I found maths, chemistry and physics (in that order) very interesting and quite frankly the coverage given by VCE is quite the joke, only the tip of the iceberg, obviously.
Hence I opted for Science at Melbourne and then MD.

Given that MBBS doesn't have any 'breadth', plus the workload was very high (so self-study was out of the question), it really put me off.

These are probably not your views, so don't worry :) I'm just having a rant
~~ rarely checking these forums these days ~~

2015: Specialist [47] | Methods [48] | Chemistry [50] | Physics [48] | English Language [46] | UMEP Mathematics [5.0] | ATAR - 99.95
Premier's Award Recipient 2016: Top All-Round VCE High Achiever
2016-2019: University of Melbourne : Bachelor of Science (Biochemistry & Molecular Biology), Diploma in Mathematics (Applied)
2019-: University of British Columbia

Splash-Tackle-Flail

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 797
  • diagnosed with bangali-fever
  • Respect: +94
Re: Melbourne Postgrad Med vs Monash Undergrad Med
« Reply #27 on: January 02, 2016, 08:48:40 pm »
0
I guess I'm in the same position ATAR-wise this year, so this was my position on it:
I really wanted to broaden myself first before launching into a narrow career such as medicine. Not that I wasn't interested in pursuing medicine as a career, but rather I found maths, chemistry and physics (in that order) very interesting and quite frankly the coverage given by VCE is quite the joke, only the tip of the iceberg, obviously.
Hence I opted for Science at Melbourne and then MD.

Given that MBBS doesn't have any 'breadth', plus the workload was very high (so self-study was out of the question), it really put me off.

These are probably not your views, so don't worry :) I'm just having a rant

Is doing something like guaranteed science or biomedicine with the intent of following into MD common amongst people with access to both postgraduate and undergraduate pathways- especially because it seems most Biomed students gun for med, and that there doesn't seem to be many other pathways from Biomed? How beneficial do you guys think having three years to explore and "relax" (using this term warily-and in contrast to the assumption MBBS is quite the killer course) before jumping into the treacherous med school journey is? Lastly, given the undergraduate's lack of breadth, how strenuous (workload wise) is overloading on such a course?
VCE: Done!
2016:  Monash University, Bachelor of Medicine/Bachelor of Surgery (Honours)
Currently offering Methods and Chemistry tutoring for 2016! (Currently full for 2016)
Splash's Life Tips :)
How to be the one who knocks

EspoirTron

  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 598
  • Respect: +82
  • School Grad Year: 2013
Re: Melbourne Postgrad Med vs Monash Undergrad Med
« Reply #28 on: January 03, 2016, 12:05:46 am »
+6
Is doing something like guaranteed science or biomedicine with the intent of following into MD common amongst people with access to both postgraduate and undergraduate pathways- especially because it seems most Biomed students gun for med, and that there doesn't seem to be many other pathways from Biomed? How beneficial do you guys think having three years to explore and "relax" (using this term warily-and in contrast to the assumption MBBS is quite the killer course) before jumping into the treacherous med school journey is? Lastly, given the undergraduate's lack of breadth, how strenuous (workload wise) is overloading on such a course?

There are other pathways for Biomed, just not as widely discussed I imagine. Although yes generally speaking if you're not certain on a health profession then potentially Science is a better option.
I wouldn't term those three years as a "relaxation" period, as Biomed is far from a cruisy undergrad. What I would say however is that, those three years are there for you to mature intellectually, emotionally, mentally and socially. The maturation growth curve coming out of Year 12 is a steep one and you develop as a character significantly in your undergrad - at least in my opinion. I think maturing in your undergrad will give you an advantage in tackling Medicine, you would have developed strong study techniques, made a friendship group and been exposed to a wider array of social situations - all important aspects of studying at any level.

I wouldn't recommend overloading unless it were necessary. VCE has a heavy bias towards achieving specific numbers. In university, although scoring highly should be an aim, you should strive to excel in all aspects of life. Completing 4 units a semester is already enough work in itself and I think doing more really detracts from other facets of your life. I completed 8 Biomedicine units this year with 0 electives, and had ~24 hours at uni with another 25-30 hours or so of independent study. Yes, it was difficult and I wouldn't recommend anyone else do it. Realise that university is more than just about the marks, and it's important to balance your health (sleep, diet, fitness, etc) and to have good group of friends.

Ultimately, no matter what pathway you take, the trek to Medicine is difficult. Just learn how to balance your time and to be opportunistic.
« Last Edit: January 03, 2016, 12:07:56 am by EspoirTron »
2012-2013: VCE
2014-2016: Bachelor of Biomedicine at Monash University

pi

  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 14348
  • Doctor.
  • Respect: +2376
Re: Melbourne Postgrad Med vs Monash Undergrad Med
« Reply #29 on: January 03, 2016, 12:13:07 am »
+4
+1 EspoirTron, top post :)

Lastly, given the undergraduate's lack of breadth, how strenuous (workload wise) is overloading on such a course?

I think you're referring to a concurrent Diploma? I'm not doing one, but friends who do manage fine. It's because they love what they do and that works well for them. I'm sure you'll have no troubles whatsoever.