Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

April 28, 2026, 07:10:16 am

Author Topic: Ho Ho... No  (Read 35358 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

blacksanta62

  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 545
  • "Anything is possible"-KG
  • Respect: +2
Re: Ho Ho... No
« Reply #120 on: May 16, 2016, 12:16:05 pm »
0
Can someone help me with this question please?
"find the antiderivative of the following"
2x - 1/(x - 1)Squared

Using u-sub but can't seem to get the right answer
(sorry phone doesn't have power thing)
Thank you
2016:
Spesh | Methods CAS | Chem | Bio | Eng |

2018-2020:
BSc @ UoM

JellyBeanz

  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 202
  • Respect: +4
Re: Ho Ho... No
« Reply #121 on: May 16, 2016, 06:14:40 pm »
+2


Here is my solution. Sorry it's so messy lol. But basically what I did was split up the fractions so it would be easily integrable. I made 2x-1 = 2(x-1) + 1. Sometimes you have to make subtle changes like this to make it integrable lol. Hope I helped and please ask If you don't understand anything.
2015 - Further Maths

2016 - English, Methods, Specialist, Physics, Chemistry.

Aims: To succeed, nothing more, nothing less.

blacksanta62

  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 545
  • "Anything is possible"-KG
  • Respect: +2
Re: Ho Ho... No
« Reply #122 on: May 16, 2016, 09:27:35 pm »
0
Hey Jelly, is that partial fractions? Or did you make the subtle changes solely on the fact that it would be easier? If that's the case, I don't understand where the "+1" came from after you factorised"2x-1". And is u-sub possible at all with this question? Other than that thank you
2016:
Spesh | Methods CAS | Chem | Bio | Eng |

2018-2020:
BSc @ UoM

JellyBeanz

  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 202
  • Respect: +4
Re: Ho Ho... No
« Reply #123 on: May 17, 2016, 06:22:14 pm »
0
Hey Jelly, is that partial fractions? Or did you make the subtle changes solely on the fact that it would be easier? If that's the case, I don't understand where the "+1" came from after you factorised"2x-1". And is u-sub possible at all with this question? Other than that thank you

Yes, as you can see i did use u-sub for one part of the expression. Basically,  what i did was realise that the i can make the numerator similar to the denominator and hence i can simplify. the +1 is there because 2(x-1) + 1 is the same as 2x - 1 (2x-2 +1 = 2x-1). and you want to keep this expression. I didn't really factorise it, rather i just changed the way it was written.
2015 - Further Maths

2016 - English, Methods, Specialist, Physics, Chemistry.

Aims: To succeed, nothing more, nothing less.

blacksanta62

  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 545
  • "Anything is possible"-KG
  • Respect: +2
Re: Ho Ho... No
« Reply #124 on: May 18, 2016, 10:22:39 pm »
0
I have a mid year trial exam coming up for specialist and then my first specialist SAC. The SAC will cover a variety of things like vectors, calculus & integral calculus and their applications but I want some suggestions on how I should relearn the material that I haven't used since last term (vectors).Should I ask my teacher for her past resources and do all the Cambridge extended response questions I didn't do? Recommendations would be greatly appreciated. 
2016:
Spesh | Methods CAS | Chem | Bio | Eng |

2018-2020:
BSc @ UoM

blacksanta62

  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 545
  • "Anything is possible"-KG
  • Respect: +2
Re: Ho Ho... No
« Reply #125 on: May 30, 2016, 07:11:40 pm »
0
With my spesh SAC approaching I would just like to know what should I include in my spesh notes? The whole SAC is tech enabled and I want to take in my own notes. My main empty areas are: Vectors; what must/should I include? I currently have some basics like the addition of vectors and how to find the magnitude of vectors. Trig: Haven't typed up much for this area of maths, more in my methods notes but not in great detail  :-\
Any suggestions will be greatly appreciated :)
2016:
Spesh | Methods CAS | Chem | Bio | Eng |

2018-2020:
BSc @ UoM

blacksanta62

  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 545
  • "Anything is possible"-KG
  • Respect: +2
Re: Ho Ho... No
« Reply #126 on: June 03, 2016, 10:25:23 pm »
0
Just a quick query: When given the graph of f(x) and told to sketch it's anti derivative what happens to the stationary points and stuff? What I mean is if given f(x) = x^3 + 3x^2 + 1 and told to sketch it's derivative then the stationary points become x-ints and the TP will be half way between the two stationary points: -b/2a, a parabola

Why doesn't seem to follow with the anti derivative? 1/4 x^4 + x^3 +x?? (not the symmetry, the x-intercepts and the TPs etc)
It seems to be strictly decreasing then strictly increasing then a point of inflection occurs while it's still increasing. Graphing these on desmos too :D

Thank you

Edit: Link to my notes on the graphs - https://www.desmos.com/calculator/kokfknmrtf
« Last Edit: June 03, 2016, 10:29:50 pm by blacksanta62 »
2016:
Spesh | Methods CAS | Chem | Bio | Eng |

2018-2020:
BSc @ UoM

lzxnl

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 3432
  • Respect: +215
Re: Ho Ho... No
« Reply #127 on: June 05, 2016, 10:37:13 pm »
0
In general, there's no relationship between the intercepts and the turning point. Parabolas are just special/lucky.
2012
Mathematical Methods (50) Chinese SL (45~52)

2013
English Language (50) Chemistry (50) Specialist Mathematics (49~54.9) Physics (49) UMEP Physics (96%) ATAR 99.95

2014-2016: University of Melbourne, Bachelor of Science, Diploma in Mathematical Sciences (Applied Maths)

2017-2018: Master of Science (Applied Mathematics)

2019-2024: PhD, MIT (Applied Mathematics)

Accepting students for VCE tutoring in Maths Methods, Specialist Maths and Physics! (and university maths/physics too) PM for more details

blacksanta62

  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 545
  • "Anything is possible"-KG
  • Respect: +2
Re: Ho Ho... No
« Reply #128 on: June 06, 2016, 06:30:52 pm »
0
In general, there's no relationship between the intercepts and the turning point. Parabolas are just special/lucky.
Ahh, thanks IzxnI
Could anyone help me with B & C?
Thank you
2016:
Spesh | Methods CAS | Chem | Bio | Eng |

2018-2020:
BSc @ UoM

zsteve

  • ATAR Notes VIC MVP - 2016
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 748
  • The LORD is my shepherd, I shall not want - Ps. 23
  • Respect: +218
Re: Ho Ho... No
« Reply #129 on: June 09, 2016, 08:41:15 pm »
0
Ahh, thanks IzxnI
Could anyone help me with B & C?
Thank you

I'll give you *pointers*, but you can do the maths yourself!
You want to integrate (upper graph)-(lower graph) between the terminals. What is the 'upper graph'/'lower graph' really depends on which region you're integrating.

The terminals should be easy enough to find.
~~ rarely checking these forums these days ~~

2015: Specialist [47] | Methods [48] | Chemistry [50] | Physics [48] | English Language [46] | UMEP Mathematics [5.0] | ATAR - 99.95
Premier's Award Recipient 2016: Top All-Round VCE High Achiever
2016-2019: University of Melbourne : Bachelor of Science (Biochemistry & Molecular Biology), Diploma in Mathematics (Applied)
2019-: University of British Columbia

blacksanta62

  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 545
  • "Anything is possible"-KG
  • Respect: +2
Re: Ho Ho... No
« Reply #130 on: June 11, 2016, 07:59:56 am »
0
Thanks zsteve

A question to anyone who is using the Cambridge spesh book: Are your worked solutions still available under 'more resources' or have they been removed? I've messaged them twice now and haven't gotten a response so I would like to know if this has only happened to me or to others.

Thanks
2016:
Spesh | Methods CAS | Chem | Bio | Eng |

2018-2020:
BSc @ UoM

blacksanta62

  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 545
  • "Anything is possible"-KG
  • Respect: +2
Re: Ho Ho... No
« Reply #131 on: August 15, 2016, 08:45:29 pm »
0
Really don't want this thread to die (kinda dead rn, nothing but tumbleweeds)
Some questions:
1) With most kinematics question, like the one attached, will these bee more prominent in exam 2? I haven't run into any in exam one papers yet
2) With the attached question, I would love some help :)
3) With kinematics, did anyone else struggle with it a bit, and if so, how did you get better at it? Practice, extra help from teachers or peers? My next SAC is on mechanics and kinematics so I would like to do well and hopefully grasp rank one  ::) ;)
4) "Find the distance traveled"- In kinematics, we find the area underneath a curve, if it's a triangle, we use A=1/2b*h, I have forgotten some of these rules, should I go over them and try to remember them?

Sorry for all the questions, thank you :)
2016:
Spesh | Methods CAS | Chem | Bio | Eng |

2018-2020:
BSc @ UoM

Sine

  • Werewolf
  • National Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *****
  • Posts: 5132
  • Respect: +2103
Re: Ho Ho... No
« Reply #132 on: August 15, 2016, 08:53:22 pm »
+2
Really don't want this thread to die (kinda dead rn, nothing but tumbleweeds)
Some questions:
1) With most kinematics question, like the one attached, will these bee more prominent in exam 2? I haven't run into any in exam one papers yet
2) With the attached question, I would love some help :)
3) With kinematics, did anyone else struggle with it a bit, and if so, how did you get better at it? Practice, extra help from teachers or peers? My next SAC is on mechanics and kinematics so I would like to do well and hopefully grasp rank one  ::) ;)
4) "Find the distance traveled"- In kinematics, we find the area underneath a curve, if it's a triangle, we use A=1/2b*h, I have forgotten some of these rules, should I go over them and try to remember them?

Sorry for all the questions, thank you :)
1) you should be able to do these both tech free and tech active, they will just have "nicer" numbers for tech free
2)Draw a velocity time graph
3)kinematics is probably best done with a practical mind so just think of each question in a practical sense. With constant acceleration questions the hardest thing would be deciding whether your allowed to use those formulae once your certain just search for 3 known variables and find the required 4th. With variable acceleration the most important thing is finding what formulae  you need to use, this is best done by checking what the final answer requires.
4)yeah learn how to find areas using rectangles,triangles and trapeziums

blacksanta62

  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 545
  • "Anything is possible"-KG
  • Respect: +2
Re: Ho Ho... No
« Reply #133 on: August 15, 2016, 09:36:14 pm »
0
Thank you :)
Has anyone else found kinematics a challenge and overcome it? Looking for more anecdotes I guess  ;D
2016:
Spesh | Methods CAS | Chem | Bio | Eng |

2018-2020:
BSc @ UoM

blacksanta62

  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 545
  • "Anything is possible"-KG
  • Respect: +2
Re: Ho Ho... No
« Reply #134 on: August 16, 2016, 09:13:07 pm »
0
Can anyone help with these questions please:
1) 8A - How do you find the value of K?
2) With question 10, I integrated but don't know what to do next-hints would be appreciated :)
I'm thinking when v=0, t=? but I don't know how to find the value of K first
3) With differential equations involving kinematics, is the '+c' still required?

Thank you
2016:
Spesh | Methods CAS | Chem | Bio | Eng |

2018-2020:
BSc @ UoM