I guess this is a bit late now but you might as well still get a reply
justify the appropriateness of a particular investigation plan
To justify your method you want to think about
- Why use these reagents in this order? The answer would always be: because [insert element here] is the most reactive and would give a positive result for all tests, confusing results, thus this element is tested for first.... (and so on - going to the next element reactive, finishing with the least reactive element)
- Why use certain equipment? For precipitation reactions, the main thing would be: using test tubes infant of a black background - allowing colour changes to be clearly identified.
Evaluate the accuracy and reliability that this could be improved investigation ... relation to the Prac test and AAS.
To evaluate the accuracy of your investigation: (for this you would have to think about how sensitive/precise are you measuring equipment at ever step)
- consider having precipitates in front of a black background to ensure the correct colour is viewed
- consider using test tubes allow the sample to be larger and therefore the result can more effectively be determined
- consider if the first tests match up with the expected results from the confirmatory tests it is likely to be accurate
- consider if equal amounts of reagent were used in each test to determine whether a precipitate formed
To evaluate the reliability of your investigation: - consider if experiment was repeated
- consider if results were consistent among tests
Accuracy and reliability of AAS: - accuracy: measures amount of specific metals present in ppm / ppb (hence, it is very sensitive way to measure metals in a substance quantitatively)
- reliability: it is a fast a simple procedure, thus it can be repeated multiple times, an average can be taken - thus it is a procedure that can produce reliable results
Hope this was helpful!

(sorry it was a bit late)