Hey guys,
I came across a Mod A question where I'm not entirely sure how to answer: How does the presentation of the female in Metropolis compare to that of 1984? How do you account for this in terms of the context of each text?
I can talk about the Madonna/whore complex with Maria and the association of sexual desire with Julia but I'm not entirely sure what else to talk about.
Well for Lang, he idolised his mother who was like the epitome of females around his time period and he was also very conservative and Christian. So he models maria after his ideal vision of a woman. He uses robot maria to highlight how the current societal changes taking place at the time would corrupt women and turn them into something resembling robot maria. Something land didn't want. So his portrayal is then both his perfect image of a women/warning of what will happen to women in the future.
As for Orwell... I'm not actually quite sure...
There was also another question where I wasn't sure: How does a study of 1984 contribute to our understanding of the nature of hope in Metropolis?
If it only asked us to discuss about the nature of hope, I could come up with ideas on emotionality, human selflessness etc. But how does a text that is produced 20 years later influence an older text...?
So when we look at metropolis, we see that there actually is hope at the end. That the head and hands can be mediated by the heart.
But in 1984, this hope is squashed completely and there is no happy ending at all.
I think when you look at it contextually, you see that Lang has hope for humanity which is why he has a hopeful ending.
But Orwell witnessed the rise of Hitler and Stalin and the brutality of the mid-20th century.
So i think it shows how much context can play a key role in how composers represent their ideas?
P.s these questions seem hard! where did you find them?
I hope this helps, sorry i couldn't be of more assistance!