Hi ssarahj, thats how I approached that essay Q, but the feedback I received from my teacher is that the essay should be focused on Pacino's LFR, so I was only answering the Q in my paragraphs about LFR.
Hey! To weigh in here, this question specifically does demand a slightly different approach than a typical comparative essay. The focus does need to be with LFR. However, you are looking at how
Pacino enriches a theme for KRIII, so it demands you make explicit thematic links between the two. So, although the focus is on Pacino, the question requires you to address KRIII to essentially the same level of depth. Here is what KRIII does, this is how Pacino accentuates.
With this in mind, I agree with Sarah, block essay would be better suited to having KRIII first in exactly the way Sarah describes.
However, unfortunately, inking the themes properly between paragraphs is tough. This question is
much better suited to an integrated paragraph style (again, completely in agreement with Sarah).
Tackling integrated paragraphs is tough (especially this close to exams), so you might not wish to change your approach this late in the game. If you want to give it a go here however, the principle would be:
Topic Sentence: Identify the theme and link to the texts
First Half of Paragraph: How does KRIII represent the theme?
Second Half: How does Pacino accentuate it (explore differently or the same)?
ConcludeThis is what I'd call a
semi-integrated approach, because you still divide by the text in the paragraph. This was my preferred approach in most Module A essays, might be worth a try
