Hey guys,
Not sure if this is the right place for my questions but yea. I have an assignment that is a combination of both reading task paper 1 and the paper 1. The catch is, instead of the extended response from the reading task this will be replaced by a modified version of the paper 1 essay. So for the last question, we have to use one of our prescribed texts (one Robert Gray poem) and one of the reading task texts as our related. I'm not exactly sure how to prepare for this though. My teacher gave me a practice question and I've attempted it, if anyone is willing to mark it, I will be one very happy student!! Also, for the modified extended response, can anyone give me tips on synthesis as that is the area I need the most improvement in?
THANK YOU SO MUCH GUYS!
From theyam
Hey! You can post your response in our
marking section to have it marked properly (you'll also need 30 posts for detailed feedback), but some quick pointers on a skim read. I don't have the question so can't judge that aspect, but:
- The use of the word 'responder' when discussing a Discovery concept is a little bit off. The concept should be separate from any textual analysis, a better word would be "individual" just like the very first sentence you wrote.
- Excellent analysis on the whole! Be careful you don't fall into describing scenes/plot points, you were borderline for a little bit in the first paragraph (a nitpick). As a clarity thing, try to always put the technique and quote in the same sentence. That way it is always clear to the marker that you've included it!
- Fantastic job maintaining your conceptual direction throughout the analysis, constantly linking back to the key idea. Really nicely done.
I think this works extremely well. Currently you are sitting on roughly three quotes/techniques per paragraph - If you are keen, you could adjust your word choices, make your explanations super concise, and get to four per paragraph. It would mean taking this:
Gray’s synaesthesia of sense imagery achieves this interpretation. The abattoir is the site for production of human sustenance and paradoxically, death. It is stained with blood “fertilizer thick”, and a “sticky stench… that sent flies mad. The nauseating effect created, provokes readers to be cognizant and thus emotionally responsive towards the brutality nature is subjected to, despite its vulnerability. And reducing it to something like:
Gray's synaesthesia of sensory imagery creates a nauseating effect in describing the "sticky stench... that sent flies mad," provoking readers to be cognizant and thus emotionally responsive towards the brutality nature is subjected to.I'd argue this would earn just as many marks as yours - Pretty much all the important bits are there. And vitally, it makes room for extra analysis. That said, I think you are already at a Band 6 standard with what you have, good stuff
