Hi Guys, I'm not sure which one is better to use as an adaptable conclusion (the only real difference is the middle part)?
Discovery is often an abstract process full of complexities that vary for individuals. Although from different époques and with dissimilar purposes, both Shakespeare’s The Tempest and Picasso’s Guernica both illustrate the (adjective) nature of discoveries founded in chaos, as even though they vary depending on perspectives, they ultimately still (integrate thesis). Despite the verity of individual perspectives leading to distinct discoveries, ultimately as Chuck Palahniuck said “real discoveries come from chaos”, and often (integrate thesis).
Discovery is often an abstract process full of complexities that vary for individuals. Although from different époques and with dissimilar purposes, both texts explore (adjective) nature of discovery through the themes of chaos and varying perspectives. Shakespeare enables a vicarious understanding of its (integrate thesis) through his characters, while Picasso stimulates this discovery within the audience. Despite the verity of individual perspectives leading to distinct discoveries, ultimately as Chuck Palahniuck said “real discoveries come from chaos”, and often (integrate thesis).