Hey guys, so I have read Medentry reviews from psyxwar and the like but they're from a while ago. Has Medentry improved their style of section 1 & 2 questions? I know that company papers will never be exactly like acers real UMAT but I just want to hear some reviews on the sections from last year and this year (if you've used them for prep
)
Thanks
Actually after last year's UMAT (after numerous complaints) Medentry has updated their papers/materials for this year.
In my opinion, 70% of section 2 questions and 60% of Section 1 questions on Medentry reflected the standards and styles found in the real UMAT exam, while prior to the update, only <30% of Section 3 questions were similar to the real UMAT.
I can't say anything about the questions available now (most are still the same - they've just added newer questions into the "new 2016 practice exams"). From what I've seen they've only really improved section 3.
The other important thing to note is that I've only sat one UMAT exam (thank god...) and my memory of it vs what may actually come up this year (and in the future) may differ quite a lot.
For those completing the UMAT in the future, I do suggest perhaps looking at companies other than Medentry and Medstart, and actually asking how the company obtains/creates their questions. Many rely on word of mouth which means the content available is not necessarily accurate, while I have heard that some companies have in fact obtained to access past ACER papers (I don't know how/when etc) and developed their course based on those, which in my opinion would be much more worth your time and money
(especially because they don't cost freaking >$1000
)