coolio- we are given 55 mins to write it (it's in a 1 hour period but it usually take 5 mins for everyone to sit down, get paper and their stuff
Lit is a tricky one if we're talking about in-class SACs, then the length can vary drastically depending on the nature of the task.
If were at a school that told you the topics for a Views and Values essay beforehand and then gives you three hours spread across three days to complete the SAC, then you'd want to be hitting the 1000+ mark with some high quality analysis in there. But if your school does the brutal exam-conditions-even-in-February thing with unseen material and an hour (or less) to finish things, then you could get a really decent score with around 700. Assuming this is your Adaptations and Transformations SAC (correct me if I'm wrong?) then you should be able to come in with a fairly good idea of what you're writing anyway since you'll have studied both the source text and the adaptation in depth beforehand, and the 'essay topics' - if you get them - won't be very restrictive in their focus.
As you say, quality > quantity, so a 600 word piece that's doing everything right will get a better score than someone who's written 800 words of waffle and nonsense, but it really depends on your writing style. My Year 12 teacher had this weird thing where she just wanted us to hit five pages... that was her only basis for critique at one point - we either hit 5 pages and got >17/20, or didn't make that cut-off and were relegated to scoring less than 17. One time, my friend and I actually typed up our respective essays to check the word count and it was like 823 vs. 824, but because I had slightly larger handwriting, my 824 piece made it to three pages and got 20/20 while my friend only got 17, and our teacher had no other comments for either of us save from 'Lauren, I'm really glad you're getting to five pages' and 'Lauren's friend, you really need to try and get to five pages next time' -.-
So you can see why obsessing over the word count (or rather page count) is highly unproductive. Just try and use it as an indicator of how much you've covered of the task so far. If you're only hitting 600 words, there are probably key elements or points of analysis you're leaving out. Whereas if you're stretching yourself to 1400, then you might be compromising clarity and quality overall.
The
really rough estimate from an exam perspective is that you want to be writing in excess of 1000 words if you want to crack the 40+ SS mark, but I'm sure there are people who've disproved this in the past. Most of the really high scoring (45+ SS) pieces that the end of the year will be
at least 1000 words because obviously someone who's got 1000 words of great content trumps someone who's only got 700 words of great content, but it's the greatness of the content they're more concerned with
