I think you'll find that when people tend to work overseas, which is most commonly during their Fellowship (ie. after passing all their registrar exams and training requirements), the medical school they went to doesn't really mean anything. I guess if for some reason you wanted to leave Australia earlier than that, something which would be irrelevant to 99% of domestic graduates, then it
might matter
Rankings aren't a reflection on the quality of primary medical degrees, but are rather determined by research the Faculty pumps out. It's not surprising the oldest medical schools have the higher rankings... they've been around for longer, it would be very odd to expect anything else. My understanding, is that again for Fellowships, it's largely a moot point. What you've done, which hospitals you have worked in, and who you've met along the way play the big roles in getting these overseas Fellowship stints. Granted, I don't have any family in the area and am just drawing conclusions on a few convos with consultants I've had along my own journey.
UoM and USyd do try and emphasise these things. And I really think they're over-emphasised to the point of exaggeration. Ultimately, and like any uni, they want the best students; and if the lure of "but hey guys it helps for some select overseas countries who have MDs implemented in them" convinces a small percentage, then good job on marketing for them!
So I guess it's fair to say, that for purposes of the vast majority of domestic students, it has absolutely no implications whatsoever!
