consequential marks

[skl]

Hi just wandering, For my last SAC a question was:
explain the 2 management SKILLS an organisation can implement to improve their operations (AOS3 operations management)
This was the easiest question ever, and probably my only mistake on the SAC, however it was content from the previous area so i pretty much mind blanked...
I wrote about leading and organiSing... which are management ROLES, however I linked it to the case study beautifully and the answer was amazing, since i finished early and had about 12 mins for the 4 marker, and if the question was about roles... it would have gotten 4/4.

Can i still get consequential marks e.g. 2/4 or higher? If i justified it well enough...  for writing leading/organizing instead of say delegation, e.t.c.. (management skills)

Thank you! 
-I WILL NOW CRY IN SILENCE (

[upandgo]

dont think you'd be able to, if the question specifically asked for management skills then you'd be required to recommend a management skill in your answer to gain full marks 

[skl]

dont think you'd be able to, if the question specifically asked for management skills then you'd be required to recommend a management skill in your answer to gain full marks 

Yes but what about a 1/4 or 2/4? surely they can reward you for displaying amazing knowledge and linkage to the case study and why these roles are necessary... CANT THEY !?!??!?

[Callum@1373]

Unfortunately you won't receive any marks, as it asked for skills and you didn't answer the question   

[Joseph41]

Yeah, I don't think this is really an issue of consequential marks - more about answering the question (as tough as that may be to take). You'll be okay, though. This will be a good learning experience if nothing else.

All the best.