Name of Article/Resource: Logistics by IKEA, on forbes.com. Published: 09/29/2005 at 10:00am.
The date of this stands out to me as not exactly contemporary given that it was published almost 12 years agoSource:
http://www.forbes.com/2005/09/28/logistics-ikea-retail-cx_rm_0929ikea.htmlSummary of the article:
The article titled “Logistics by IKEA” comprises of information
the language here seems a little bit forced and formal, try to say things a bit more naturally, flowy and succinctly related to IKEA’s Operation Strategies in regards to Supply Chain Management through Logistics. IKEA has pioneered many innovative approaches to Logistics which allow the company to minimise costs and smoothly manage it’s flow of supplies to outputs that best meet the needs of it’s customer base. These unconventional approaches include IKEA’s innovation
try to think of another word for innovation - it's good but I am afraid you will repeat it a lot of flat-packs, application of costs-per-touch strategy and operation of retail outlets simultaneously as warehouses.
This is good
But I know that you have probably been inundated with English introductions as this sort of reminds me of one. Don't be afraid to chuck in some statistics to back up what you are saying especially to show the increase in efficiency, quality, speed (this would be a great way to link it to performance objectives from the strategies dot point. Some of these sentences are too general, sweeping statements introducing what you will be talking about How
"How" is sort of a hybrid BOS directive verb which really means explain - therefore you should show a cause and effect as well as draw out the relationships. Not sure if you totally did this within the paragraph is your article linked to your syllabus point?
You know what would be great, if you have a definition of what SCM and logistics are so that you could have a more concrete link to Ikea and the syllabus!My syllabus point encompasses two overall headings, Supply Chain Management (SCM) and Logistics. My article about displays that IKEA combines it’s supply chain operations with logistical inventory management techniques (outlined below) to create a system that operates effortlessly from it’s manufacturing base to distribution centres, and then retail outlets, delivering the fastest supply chain route as possible.
I would like to see a bit more drawing out the relationship between Ikea's strategies and logistics - why do they do it? what specific areas do they focus on? benefits? drawbacks? etc.Describe
characteristics and features should be provided to answer this directive verb the action(s) taken by managers
Costs-per-touch Strategy: IKEA has engaged a costs-per-touch strategy to satisfactorily manage all inventory, which means “the more hands touch the product, the more costs are associated with it.”¹ Every time the product is shipped, moved, and loaded, it incurs costs. The fewer times someone moves or touches the item, the fewer costs are associated with it. To reduce the amount of “touches”, and therefore “costs” associated with transportation, IKEA allows customers to directly purchase and retrieve products from it’s warehouses, which simultaneously serve as retail outlets. (see dot point below). In doing so, IKEA reduces the transportation required of the product to the customer, instead encouraging self-service and reducing costs incurred. The less the product is transported through various modes, the faster it arrives to the customer, allowing for the shortest, and therefore fastest supply chain combination. Overall, this tactical logistics strategy manages inventory and reduces costs, while ensuring a fast and effective supply chain
This is a lot of retelling of what they do but not so much relating it back to the syllabus and showing the relationship between Ikea's actions/strategies and SCM/logistics IKEA utilises it’s warehouses as simultaneous retail outlets.
This sort of short sentence - whilst I get that you are using it as the title of the strategy - seems a little awkward and out of place ... maybe you could combine the first two sentences (stylistic thing though, feel free to ignore) This allows customers to come into warehouses and purchase items directly, instead of having a demonstration room which incurs more costs.
It would be cool if you could elaborate on the drawbacks as well 
Goods are transported directly from distribution centres via rail to warehouses, and then are purchased by the customers. This logistics tactic encourages self-service, as customers are able to choose and buy products directly from IKEA’s
diverse, stocked, warehouse, leading to a
fast efficient supply chain that produces outputs suited to the customer’s needs.
I'm not totally sure that the fact that the warehouse is the retail outlet directly "produces outputs suited to the customers needs" since that is a function of production and not SCM or logistics - instead you should focus on having an efficient supply chain and the benefits of that Through it’s initially unorthodox innovation of flat-packaging by founder Ingvar Kamprad in 1943,
This sort of retell is unnecessary IKEA is able to package it’s products into disassembled parts in flat boxes, or flat-packs. IKEA follows an “Air out, product in” ² method
Not sure what this quote means, could you perhaps elaborate a little bit. As a result, IKEA’s packages take up a significantly reduced amount of space compared to fully assembled goods, and consequently curtails space being occupied in warehouse bins and transportation trucks. This minimizes overall transport cost, as maximum amount of items are being transported in one truck and thus reduces costs such as fuel, stocking costs, paying the driver, security, etc. IKEA’s unique packaging strategy has allowed for faster
How exactly is it faster? It might be more efficient and able to transport larger quantities ... but transporting larger quantities could slow down the truck/plain/train transportation of goods from the manufacturing plants to distribution centres and then to warehouses and customers, effectively facilitating the speed of the supply chain to rapid levels, while consecutively reducing costs to a minimum.
It's great that you are hitting efficiency and the benefits of efficient proccedures as well as strategies to create efficiency - but you should try to integrate other objectives and goals such as profit, business performance, reputation --> these sort of things will show that you know your syllabus and have a more thorough and extensive case study report 
Did the strategies work? Why or why not?
Yes, the strategies have been successful becauseIKEA has been able to manage it’s inventory in a logistically strategic manner which enables it to reduce wastage of time and resources, and hasten the supply chain to allow for the best outputs to reach it’s customer base efficiently and effectively.
I'd like to see a bit more elaboration for this including a few more statistics, Demonstrate statistics, which support your point/idea?
One of Forbes’ World’s Most Valuable Brands³, IKEA has consistently demonstrated increasing and positive statistics in all areas of it’s business. IKEA’s brand value as of May 2016 is 18 Billion Euros, and it’s annual revenue increased from 10.9 Billion Euros in 2001 to 29.3 Billion Euros in 2014⁴. This demonstrates that IKEA’s strategies are effective and adequate in the business’s purpose, as it has achieved high levels of sustained profit over an extensive period of time while implementing these strategies.
Revnue and profit are good indicators but you're not really demonstrating the effectiveness of these strategies - you could show how their expenses compare to business like theirs (since you are saying their strategies help Ikea to minimise waste and decrease expenses much more than other businesses) you could also use statistics, quotes or case studies to describe the nature and relationship of Ikea's Supply ChainExplain how your case study is interdependent with one other key business functions?
Marketing is the process of planning and executing the conception, pricing, promotion and distribution of ideas, goods and services to create exchanges that satisfy individual and organisational objectives⁵.
Good definition IKEA’s logistical strategies under Supply Chain Management allow for customers to receive outputs efficiently and effectively, as outlined above, at minimised costs. This is also interdependent with the key business function of marketing, as the final result of these logistical strategies is the satisfaction of customers, and the retainment of an existing customer base, while also enticing potential customers to purchase IKEA’s products, which are low of cost and readily available in local IKEA retail outlets/warehouses.
I'm not sure that you are totally showing the relationship between these two dot points - further than a brief overview of what these two dot points are. You should try to find and elaborate on the links between logistics/scm and marketing - e.g. who the suppliers are and the relationship between them can be used for marketing purposes (such as food places advertising free range, organic etc...Marking Criteria:
Cast Study chosen allows the student to answer all of the questions extensively /4 -
Really good on describing what the strategies are but the evaluation is a little weakAll BOS verbs have been addressed accurately, answers are concise and in detail, statistics used are relevant /4 -
some higher order verbs need a little more elaboration - and maybe less retell at times, but overall good understanding of the directive verbs 
No obvious mistakes /3
- none that I can see with a quick skim overClear Link to the Syllabus /3 -
links to the syllabus could be highlighted more and talked about furtherA contemporary and interesting case study has been selected /2 -
highly subjective in my opinion. Who's to say what is interesting and what isn'tCase Study has been selected from a highly credible source /2 - Forbes - you should be fine
