Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

April 24, 2026, 04:32:22 am

Author Topic: Are 2016 checkpoints OK to use?  (Read 920 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

bigbrownsurfer

  • Adventurer
  • *
  • Posts: 5
  • Respect: 0
Are 2016 checkpoints OK to use?
« on: August 01, 2017, 09:46:07 pm »
0
I got a second handed bio 2016 checkpoint and was wondering if that was ok to use this year? I know the study design changed but I'm not sure how much it changed exactly.

Quantum44

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 756
  • Respect: +313
Re: Are 2016 checkpoints OK to use?
« Reply #1 on: August 01, 2017, 10:08:01 pm »
+2
I got a second handed bio 2016 checkpoint and was wondering if that was ok to use this year? I know the study design changed but I'm not sure how much it changed exactly.

It should be ok. In terms of Unit 3 it is pretty much the same aside from transferring some molecular genetics from the old unit 4. The new unit 4 has been shaken up a bit though. Classic Punnett square genetics is gone and they've focused more on evolution and it's relationship with genetics.
UAdel MBBS

vox nihili

  • National Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *****
  • Posts: 5343
  • Respect: +1447
Re: Are 2016 checkpoints OK to use?
« Reply #2 on: August 02, 2017, 11:00:14 pm »
0

I got a second handed bio 2016 checkpoint and was wondering if that was ok to use this year? I know the study design changed but I'm not sure how much it changed exactly.

Nope. New study design so I don't think 2016 checkpoints should be the focus of your study.

Unit 3 has made some cosmetic changes but is largely similar, unit 4 is pretty different. Judging by the changes to the study design, I wouldn't be surprised if VCAA begun to change the way they ask questions in biology a little bit.
2013-15: BBiomed (Biochemistry and Molecular Biology), UniMelb
2016-20: MD, UniMelb
2019-20: MPH, UniMelb
2021-: GDipBiostat, USyd