Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

November 11, 2025, 04:49:51 am

Author Topic: brenden's Ask Me Anything  (Read 34712 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

sweetiepi

  • National Moderator
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 4767
  • "A Bit of Chaos" (she/they)
  • Respect: +3589
Hey Brenden!
Your responses are already on fire, what's your second favourite meme, and why?
« Last Edit: August 12, 2017, 11:37:32 am by insanipi »
2017-2019: Bachelor of Pharmaceutical Science (Formulation Science)
2020: Bachelor of Pharmaceutical Science (Honours) Read my uni journey here!

brenden

  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 7185
  • Respect: +2593
Hi brenden,

- how did you achieve almost perfect marks in uni?
what were your studying tips/tricks?
- what else did you study in your degree? (like subject areas) anything else you really liked?

thank you :)
how did you achieve almost perfect marks in uni?
what were your studying tips/tricks?

Here's something I wrong in 2015, when I was my third year of Uni:

Become a bafflingly and slightly worrisome semi-psychotic fiend about your marks and pretend not to be one when you go outside.
I feel bad for giving this shitty answer even though I gave it because it is literally the answer to your question.

What do I mean about being a semi-psychotic fiend?

Really, by this, I'm just talking about a hyper sense of discipline that pertains to your marks less than it does your studies (as your studies will only function as an extension of your pedanticness over your marks -- if you take the 'fiend' route).

To give you an example, the first year Philosophy unit "Life, Death, and Morality" has 10 "bonus" quizzes that are each worth .5% each. So if you complete all 10 successfully, you can get 105% for the unit. Now, in my first year, if push came to shove I would likely have stayed up all night if it meant getting that .5%. (I'm serious).

This is a pretty extreme example, though, but the principle I'm trying to invoke is the idea that you need to care about the little things because they add up. The .5% probably doesn't make much difference, but what about an assignment worth 5%? 10%? 15%? I treat them all like a major essay - i.e, I make sure every sentence is perfect. This way, you build a buffer. People forget that even though there's weightings, if you get 80% in all your assessments, you get 80 for the unit. Why, then, not ensure that you get more than 80 in the small, easy ones, so you've got a buffer come major essays and exams? In a lot of the exams I've sat, I've only needed 50%-75% on them in order to HD, which is a huge advantage. Why? Because I'm unhealthily obsessive. This quite literally isn't intelligence. It's obsessive discipline. (I'm not being one of those people that's all like "i'm totally not smart I just work so hard". I am smart, but I also believe this 'fiendishness' is more conducive to a system where marks are based more on habits than intelligence).

Like, I look at people that don't hand in assessments worth 2.5% and feel like I'm going insane... did I really just see someone ignore a free 2.5%? You would be surprised by how careless a lot of people are... So my first tip is just be overwhelmingly conscientious.

How I study for my Arts degree... I go to lectures, absorb as much as I can without looking at my phone or taking notes, then I go to tutes and discuss as much as I can, and I make sure I do my readings and then I google extra stuff to get a broader, but not necessarily much deeper, understanding of what we're doing in class. So I see the where the content fits into a particular puzzle, which makes the content 'click'.

That's about as much as I can say about study habits... Really, they're just dependent upon the given pattern of assessments I get given throughout the semester. My study habits are like chess moves... I'm not sure if you're familiar with game theory decision making but that's sort of how you should approach uni. Emotionlessly and logically.

I make to-do lists and work through them, which I've always found better than schedules and which is conducive to the "work whenever you want" nature of uni. If you have a to-do list, then you can just work through the to-do list and that's all there is to it.

Everything I've just said probably tells you about how I manage a (very semi) semi-active social life and extra curricular activities... If going out would compromise my marks, I don't go out. If going out would benefit my marks, I go out.

Okay, so things aren't that morbid. The first part is definitely true, and I just go out when I feel like it, which isn't too often. I normally just relax at home - I certainly have the time to go out if I wanted to though. Essentially, when you're psychotic enough about it, you should burn through your to-do list pretty quickly and have a fair amount of spare time. When you're on top of uni and focus on it as your first priority, it's actually pretty easy. Again, I'm not being "one of those" people - but if you don't have a job and all you do is study, things are simple enough. In Arts anyway. The issue a lot of people have with uni is that they're in a situation that FORCE other things - like work - to be the top priority, and that's when the type of conscientiousness required for consistently high marks becomes tough. It's just shit, really, because some people just have to work and can't afford to focus on it. The other side of that coin is people who COULD focus on it but just don't care enough to bother. It's actually a pretty small minority that are nuts about their undergraduate marks... and, spoiler alert... they're all in Biomed. So, "how do live life and uni?" --- focus on uni and live life in the time you have remaining - which should be sufficient given you do the first task right.

- what else did you study in your degree? (like subject areas) anything else you really liked?
Honestly, I basically studied nothing other than Philosophy and Human Rights Theory (and virtually every HRT unit I took was also a Philosophy unit). So of the 24 units I completed something like 18 of them were pure Philosphy. There might have been one that was pure Human Rights and... the others, I just didn't like. Hahahaha.

The pure Philosophy units I took were:

Life Death Morality
Introduction to Logic
The Ethics of Global Conflict
The Moral Psychology of Evil
Ethics
Poverty, Ecology, and International Justice
Political Philosophy
Time, Self, and Mind
Stoic and Epicurean Philosophy
Metaphysics
Critical Thinking - How to Improve Your Reasoning Skills
Democratic Theory
Symbolic Logic
God, Freedom, and Evil
Philosophy of Religion
The Human Body and the International Marketplace



✌️just do what makes you happy ✌️

brenden

  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 7185
  • Respect: +2593
How do you deal with a teacher who you admire as a person, but you don't like their teaching style? My English teacher is a great person, but she doesn't really "teach" us, she gives us worksheets to fill and then expects us to be able to write essays without explaining what we need to put in.
Hey Pumpion, this is such a brutal scenario, especially this late in the year.

Honestly, I'd just schedule time with her individually and ask her to guide you. Like, from your teacher's perspective, she might be doing what she thinks is best... and it's hard for her to know what people need if no one actually ever tells her. She might have the ability to teach the stuff you need, if only you give her some guidance.

I wouldn't outright say "Miss, you're shit". I'd schedule an appointment and say, "Miss, I'm struggling with XYZ". I just need some more guidance on how to xyz, could you give me that guidance?" and I'm sure she will lend assistance.

If she can't, or won't, then I'd double down your efforts to learn things by yourself by sucking dry the resources available to you - like AN or other teachers.

There are always going to be things in life where you don't like someone's style, or someone's personality is a little bit annoying. Ultimately, we have to take responsibility for what we can control and deal with it. If she's not giving you what you need - well, that's a bummer, but not worth thinking about for more than 2 seconds. Instead, it's time to get what you need from somewhere else, even if it takes a little bit of effort!
✌️just do what makes you happy ✌️

Melody_Zhou66

  • Fresh Poster
  • *
  • Posts: 3
  • Respect: 0
Hello, would you be able to assist in Biology questions? What is your advice for maximizing your opportunities of getting into your desired course?

brenden

  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 7185
  • Respect: +2593
+14
>Is your dog a good boy?
>What is your favourite joke?
>Given your indecisiveness with what degree to take in uni, how do you feel about what you graduated with?

>Is your dog a good boy?


>What is your favourite joke?
Changing your username to Caleboiiiiiiz (unfortunately in the past :( )

>Given your indecisiveness with what degree to take in uni, how do you feel about what you graduated with?
Extremely happy. I graduated with a Bachelor of Arts, which is what I should have been enrolled in in the first place.

So like, I ended up where I was supposed to be.

Bachelor of Arts/Bachelor of Education
Bachelor of Arts/Bachelor of Science
Bachelor of Arts/Bachelor of Laws
Bachelor of Arts.

There's only one constant, there, and it was the one constant for a reason. When I dropped education, I should have just dropped education and gone straight into a BA, but perhaps I didn't have the courage or the self-insight. I am not sure. But I am certainly happy with what I graduated with - I gained a lot from uni and really enjoyed my education, and I'm grateful for what it gave me.
✌️just do what makes you happy ✌️

brenden

  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 7185
  • Respect: +2593
Okay I've got a question [actually questions]

1. I can't seem to improve my expression in English, whenever I analyze language for example, I always end up saying 'this positions the reader to' or it makes the reader feel'- how do I improve this????

2. Rankings suck, but I was just wondering, lets say hypothetically, I get higher then rank 1, and he gets really low- wouldn't it be unfair if he got my awesome grades for his SAC marks and I got his crappy ones??? And then I don't get it, how gets the higher mark??
3. Thanks for taking the time out to address the many concerns of year 12 students!!!  :)
Hey!

The two best threads for improving expression are here:

https://atarnotes.com/forum/index.php?topic=162777.0
https://atarnotes.com/forum/index.php?topic=158168.0

There's probably a few thousands words there - so that will be far more instructional than anything I could write you right now!

2. Rankings suck, but I was just wondering, lets say hypothetically, I get higher then rank 1, and he gets really low- wouldn't it be unfair if he got my awesome grades for his SAC marks and I got his crappy ones??? And then I don't get it, how gets the higher mark??

Hey! You wouldn't get his crappy ones. If he were 1 and you were 2, and he bombed, you wouldn't get his marks! Your SAC marks would be aligned closer to the top.

It's not unfair that his SAC marks stay higher than yours. He beat you in the SACs, right? So after moderation, he should still beat you, no?

If you won a 100m race, then raced in the 200m and lost... Do you not deserve the gold medal for the 100m? They are two different races.

If someone wins in the SACs, they deserve the gold medal in SACs. If they then don't finish on the podium for the  exam, they don't deserve a medal.... but they also don't deserve to have their gold medal taken away. Does that make sense?

SACs and Exams are totally different - if you beat someone in the exam that was ranked higher than you, that doesn't mean you deserve to beat them in the SACs. If you deserved to beat them in the SACs, why didn't you already?

Please let me know if that makes sense - this is a very important question and I am very happy to follow up on it if you don't follow my reasoning.
✌️just do what makes you happy ✌️

brenden

  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 7185
  • Respect: +2593
[BRB HAVE TO GO PICK UP MY BROTHER TALK SOON ATAR NOTES OKAY XOXOOXOXOX]
✌️just do what makes you happy ✌️

brenden

  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 7185
  • Respect: +2593
What is your favourite meme?
Hey Brenden!
Your responses are already on fire, what's your second favourite meme, and why?

Meme Number 1 - Courage Wolf
Meme Number 2 - Scumbag Steve

I like Scumbag Steve because of the cadence. Top line neutral, bottom line downbeat. Bazinga.
✌️just do what makes you happy ✌️

brenden

  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 7185
  • Respect: +2593
Hi brenden,

Is psychology a true science?
Of course it is. It's not really an argument, is it?

If you define science:

Quote
the intellectual and practical activity encompassing the systematic study of the structure and behaviour of the physical and natural world through observation and experiment.

Psychology is the systematic study of the human mind and behaviour through observation and experiment.

Ergo, must be a science.

Anyone arguing it's not a science either needs to change the definition of science or explain in what way Psychology is not systematic/experimental.

The more controversial question is whether Psychology constitutes good science.
✌️just do what makes you happy ✌️

Ashjames

  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 152
  • Life.is.short-incorrect-Its the longest thing ever
  • Respect: +22
Hey!

The two best threads for improving expression are here:

https://atarnotes.com/forum/index.php?topic=162777.0
https://atarnotes.com/forum/index.php?topic=158168.0

There's probably a few thousands words there - so that will be far more instructional than anything I could write you right now!

2. Rankings suck, but I was just wondering, lets say hypothetically, I get higher then rank 1, and he gets really low- wouldn't it be unfair if he got my awesome grades for his SAC marks and I got his crappy ones??? And then I don't get it, how gets the higher mark??

Hey! You wouldn't get his crappy ones. If he were 1 and you were 2, and he bombed, you wouldn't get his marks! Your SAC marks would be aligned closer to the top.

It's not unfair that his SAC marks stay higher than yours. He beat you in the SACs, right? So after moderation, he should still beat you, no?

If you won a 100m race, then raced in the 200m and lost... Do you not deserve the gold medal for the 100m? They are two different races.

If someone wins in the SACs, they deserve the gold medal in SACs. If they then don't finish on the podium for the  exam, they don't deserve a medal.... but they also don't deserve to have their gold medal taken away. Does that make sense?

SACs and Exams are totally different - if you beat someone in the exam that was ranked higher than you, that doesn't mean you deserve to beat them in the SACs. If you deserved to beat them in the SACs, why didn't you already?

Please let me know if that makes sense - this is a very important question and I am very happy to follow up on it if you don't follow my reasoning.

Thanks Brenden- love the analogy btw!!!

Yeah I kinda do get it, but what really stressed me out is that on my 2nd SAC I bummed out. I actually gave up half-way though the SAC and refused to complete it. I left out half of it as was legitimately thinking of dropping out. So that is where I gave rank 2 the advantage. and that's why I'm concerned. Because he is not as strong as me- I've been getting higher than him ever since I'm trying hard. So I'm freaking out because  wanna be rank one so that I can get above 45- you feel me

Thanks again Brenden

jason.rodrigues

  • Fresh Poster
  • *
  • Posts: 1
  • Respect: 0
Hey man,
would you happen to know what you'd need to be averaging in subjects to get above 70?
Subjects: English, HHD, Further, Food, Business

brenden

  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 7185
  • Respect: +2593
hey Brendan! i just wanted some tips on ways to prepare for exams since i'm trying to remember concepts from unit 3! i'm trying to achieve an ATAR Of 80! I'm doing pretty well in classes averaging A and some A+ , however my memory is not so good so i'm really stressed out i wanna do well but time is going so fast i over-stress

btw my subjects are English, Business management , Legal studies and HHD including a health science university subject which counts as my 5th subject
Hey, great question! Sounds like you're in a really really good position to be honest... you can definitely achieve 80+!!!!

I think the #1 that combats stress is routine - good routine. Find peace if repetition. Wake up 30 minutes earlier, rug the fuck up, and go for a walk. Come home. Eat the same breakfast. RELAX daily.

As for your memory...

One thing I liked to do for definitional subjects like Business and Legal would be to write out all the definitions I need, then record myself saying the definitions in a really enthusiastic and slow way, with plenty of vocal emphasis on key words and so on. Then, I would just listen to that recording all the fucking time.

But even better than that is practice exams and practice questions. The best way to learn something is through experience. You'll learn how to be a good driver not through memorising all the road rules and so on, but by driving a lot and becoming comfortable with it. Learning that you should check your mirrors, indicate, then check your blindspot is all well and good - but you'll never truly learn why that's important until you nearly kill a fucking motorcyclist after only checking your mirrors and not your blindspot.

Do practice questions, get them wrong, realise why you got them wrong (realise what you forgot), and you'll remember it better than ever.

Doing more practice will also decrease your stress because you'll become more and more familiar with what you need to do and how you will be tested on it :)
✌️just do what makes you happy ✌️

brenden

  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 7185
  • Respect: +2593
Hi
I am not happy with some of my sac marks, do I still have hope to get 75+ ATAR?
Thanks
Absolutely you do!

I wasn't happy with some of my SAC marks and I got above 90. I know people who weren't happy with some of  their SAC marks and got above 99. I know people who weren't happy with some of their SAC marks and got above 70.

So much of your scores are yet to be determined by remaining SACs and remaining exams, and it takes more than just 'some' SAC marks to reduce your ATAR significantly. Keep working hard and you never know what you might achieve!
✌️just do what makes you happy ✌️

brenden

  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 7185
  • Respect: +2593
Hey Brendan!

How did your perception on life change after studying Philosophy at Uni?  :)
Such a fucking hectic question, good work.

It's a really tough one because if you think about it, I was in uni from like, 17 to 21. (Turned 18 in my first week of uni but, you know).

That's a huge change, right? Like for a lot of people, literally your entire worldview will change from 18 to 21/22, and like, who knows what changed it? Was it philosophy, was it a new job, was it new living arrangements? Who knows?

I think one really easy thing to point towards is that Philosophy killed my belief in objective morality haha. When I first started I was so certain in my belief that some things were just bloody wrong!! And some things, you just bloody ought to do! I mean, that's what my parents taught me - it's wrong to steal! It's right to hold a door open! If you do wrong, you should be disappointed, and if you do right, you should be happy!

I had a pretty certain and pretty clear set of beliefs about morality - and I'd thought about morality a lot before I ever started Philosophy - and so when I started taking the course it basically challenged all the fucking beliefs I had and tore them to shreds hahahaha. When I realised that an objective morality might not exist, I did as much research as I could on moral realism, relativism, liberalism, rights, and so on. At the beginning I was trying to find evidence that my view was true and really trying to hold on to that belief. It took like 6-12 months for me to release that view and do a complete reversal. I no longer believe that there's a set of objective moral facts - which is a pretty huge perception on life, I think.

Otherwise, I think Philosophy made me think more methodically and with less bias. I think it made me less judgmental/irrational... I can see perspectives outside of my own a lot better now, and I can empathise with different ideologies far better than I used to be able to. Before my degree I'd think, "Wow, right-wing people are just terrible and disgusting!" and now... I guess I just see that right-wing people are actually just people with a different set of beliefs - and I can even see how they'd reasonably come to that set of beliefs, even if I don't agree with them.

So it probably calmed me down a bit. Instead of having intense emotional reactions to statements, my reaction now is basically just to ask, "is that valid", and then, "are those statements up for reasonable debate?".

Those are probably the most broad answers I can give you. It changed so many other things in a really micro level - obviously I know a lot more about the world than I did 3 years ago, and so many of my beliefs have changed - but those two things mentioned above are probably the best answers for how it's changed my 'perception of life'.

Thanks for the awesome question!
✌️just do what makes you happy ✌️

brenden

  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 7185
  • Respect: +2593
Hi brenden,
1) when do you think is the best time to start revising for end-of-year exams?
2) how long did it take for you to find out what way of revising content works best for you? e.g. cue cards, diagrams, memorisation, etc.
1). As soon as you've finished the content, which I'd aim to do by the end of September at the latest.

2. For English and humanities type subjects, teaching was always the best way of revision - I just don't think it's beatable by any of the methods you've mentioned. Closely followed by practice questions.

For Further Maths (the only maths subject I took), it was just practice questions - no teaching even needed lol.

I figured that out pretty quickly I think. Teaching is just natural and is super well known to be the best way to reinforce your own knowledge, and practice questions are pretty well established as one of the best ways to boost your VCE/HSC score.
✌️just do what makes you happy ✌️