Assess the effectiveness of law reform in the criminal justice system
Spoiler
Although the legal system is dependent on law reform to remain relevant in a dynamic society, it has only been partially effective in the criminal justice system. These inadequacies have been a direct result of the inherent difficulty in balancing the rights of the offender, victim and society. Such is the case in the recent bail amendments, where attempts to achieve justice for the accused, comes at the expense of the rights of the wider community. Further reforms to the majority verdict have tarnished the standard of ‘beyond reasonable doubt’, by reducing the criteria for a valid conviction. As well, the introduction of mandatory sentences has breached the separation in powers, resulting in the limitation of judicial powers and hindering their ability to adapt to the unique features of each case. These attempts to adapt to the changing nature of society have ultimately posed a threat to the achievement of justice, thus rendering law reform as only a partially effective measure in the criminal justice system.
Hey,
From the looks of things, you intro looks a little bit long. Whilst it is written really well, there's probably a bit too much listing of you actual arguments; it almost looks as if you have your thesis points as the body of the intro. Instead I'd shorten your three arguments down to bite size statements, perhaps listed as recent reforms to x, x, and x have limited the ability of the legal system to operate in an effective manner which has resulted in <X>.
From there, I'd establish some clear criteria (the X), whilst you have listed the achievement of justice as one, this criterion is a little broad to be the only one you use, perhaps you should frame the balancing of the rights as the main criterion or an additional one.
All in all, pretty good, but remember that your intro should be relatively tight, not that ~170 words is too long, it just could be shorter, and perhaps a bit more direct.
Of course, that's just my opinion, and I'm happy to hear any dissenting opinions.