Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

June 15, 2025, 03:46:57 am

Author Topic: Physics: Discussion, Questions & Potential Solutions  (Read 50781 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

ralguy666

  • Fresh Poster
  • *
  • Posts: 1
  • Respect: 0
Re: Physics: Discussion, Questions & Potential Solutions
« Reply #150 on: November 15, 2018, 07:48:00 pm »
0
Just wondering about the gravity question where you had to substitute 2R (radius) for R. There has been some talk at school that it said 2R from the surface meaning you had to sub in 3R. Was wondering if the exam said that.

Richard Feynman 101

  • Forum Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 54
  • Respect: -12
Re: Physics: Discussion, Questions & Potential Solutions
« Reply #151 on: November 15, 2018, 07:51:19 pm »
-4
can someone send multiple choice answers through pls its been a day

IKR

MrTeacherMan

  • Adventurer
  • *
  • Posts: 7
  • Respect: 0
Re: Physics: Discussion, Questions & Potential Solutions
« Reply #152 on: November 15, 2018, 07:53:58 pm »
+1
Just with the counting of the squares VCAA will have to accept a range for instance, I got 14 sqaures, however, 13 sqaures is perfectly reasonsable. Still don't know why integration is out of the scope but oh well.

While integration is technically correct, we can’t assume that students have undertaken the relevant subjects to be able to use it.

Counting the squares is the preferred method for Units 3 & 4.

However if you undertake physics in university, calculus plays a major role, so it’s a good idea to familiarise yourself with it.
« Last Edit: November 15, 2018, 07:57:52 pm by MrTeacherMan »
Physics and maths teacher at [undisclosed location]

I also play Runescape

MrTeacherMan

  • Adventurer
  • *
  • Posts: 7
  • Respect: 0
Re: Physics: Discussion, Questions & Potential Solutions
« Reply #153 on: November 15, 2018, 08:00:47 pm »
+1
Just wondering about the gravity question where you had to substitute 2R (radius) for R. There has been some talk at school that it said 2R from the surface meaning you had to sub in 3R. Was wondering if the exam said that.

The question specified 2R above the surface of the planet. This means that you are 3R from the centre of the planet.

Substituting 3R then gives you an answer 1/9th of the original field strength.
Physics and maths teacher at [undisclosed location]

I also play Runescape

wanigara

  • Victorian
  • Trailblazer
  • *
  • Posts: 49
  • Respect: +3
Re: Physics: Discussion, Questions & Potential Solutions
« Reply #154 on: November 15, 2018, 08:14:58 pm »
+5
can someone send multiple choice answers through pls its been a day
Multi Choice Answers:

(1) B (2) A (3) A (4) D (5) C (6) C (7) A (8) C (9) B (10) D (11) D (12) C (13) D (14) B (15)D (16) C (17) A (18) A (19) B (20) B
Look deep into nature, and then you will understand everything better. Albert Einstein

wanigara

  • Victorian
  • Trailblazer
  • *
  • Posts: 49
  • Respect: +3
Re: Physics: Discussion, Questions & Potential Solutions
« Reply #155 on: November 15, 2018, 09:42:28 pm »
+1
Solution Q(10)
(a) Passengers zero gravity implies to apparent weightlessness, where N= 0, hence Velocity at the top of the flight  V= Root(rg)
r = 3.31x10^3 m
(b) No, Passenger is still under earths gravity at an altitude of 8000m. Zero gravity experiences means that normal reaction force acting on the passenger become 0 (N= 0) so he/she will experience the apparent weightlessness.
Look deep into nature, and then you will understand everything better. Albert Einstein

wanigara

  • Victorian
  • Trailblazer
  • *
  • Posts: 49
  • Respect: +3
Re: Physics: Discussion, Questions & Potential Solutions
« Reply #156 on: November 15, 2018, 09:47:59 pm »
+2
(Q11)
(a) Lambda = 1.0 m v=f*lambda
(b) Path difference (PD) to second nodal position = 1.5 Lambda
PD = AX- BX = (AX - (10-AX)) = 1.5 m
AX = 5.75 m. So distance from centre to 2nd nodal point = 0.75 m
Look deep into nature, and then you will understand everything better. Albert Einstein

wanigara

  • Victorian
  • Trailblazer
  • *
  • Posts: 49
  • Respect: +3
Re: Physics: Discussion, Questions & Potential Solutions
« Reply #157 on: November 15, 2018, 09:51:56 pm »
+2
(Q12) (a) C= f Lambda, f = 5.31x10^14 Hz
(b) n1 Sin Thetac = n2, Hence Critical Angel = 60.3 degrees
(c0 n = c/v, v = 3*10^8/ 1.67  = 1.80x10^8 ms^-1
Look deep into nature, and then you will understand everything better. Albert Einstein

wanigara

  • Victorian
  • Trailblazer
  • *
  • Posts: 49
  • Respect: +3
Re: Physics: Discussion, Questions & Potential Solutions
« Reply #158 on: November 15, 2018, 09:58:42 pm »
+2
(Q13)(a) Energy of a single photon = E = hc/lambda = 3.26*10^-19 J
Hence number of photons leaving the laser in each second = 5.03x10^-3/ 3.26x10^-19 = 1.54* 10^16 Photons

(b) Point C at the centre, hence path difference is Zero. When path difference is zero it produces a constructive interference at the centre which gives a bright band.

(c) Path difference = 2.14x10^-6, Lambda = 610 nm

The order of the band at x = PD/ Lambda = 3.5 (4th Dark band) X is the 4th dark band to the right from the centre.
Look deep into nature, and then you will understand everything better. Albert Einstein

Alexmaths

  • Adventurer
  • *
  • Posts: 7
  • Respect: 0
Re: Physics: Discussion, Questions & Potential Solutions
« Reply #159 on: November 15, 2018, 10:33:52 pm »
0
What do you guys think A+ cutoff will be on this exam? Overall I felt it was close to last years but some questions definitely threw me off.

aussiboi

  • Adventurer
  • *
  • Posts: 24
  • Respect: 0
Re: Physics: Discussion, Questions & Potential Solutions
« Reply #160 on: November 15, 2018, 10:35:57 pm »
-2
I think A+ cut off will be 125/130 considering how EASY the exam was

wanigara

  • Victorian
  • Trailblazer
  • *
  • Posts: 49
  • Respect: +3
Re: Physics: Discussion, Questions & Potential Solutions
« Reply #161 on: November 15, 2018, 10:39:59 pm »
+3
I think A+ cut off will be 125/130 considering how EASY the exam was
I would say around 87 - 88% which is around 115/130
Look deep into nature, and then you will understand everything better. Albert Einstein

wanigara

  • Victorian
  • Trailblazer
  • *
  • Posts: 49
  • Respect: +3
Re: Physics: Discussion, Questions & Potential Solutions
« Reply #162 on: November 15, 2018, 11:06:55 pm »
+2
(Q14)
No. Its is uncertain whether its velocity is constant though the speed is constant. Spaceship could be in a circular orbit then will be accelerating radially or its direction could be changing. For ship to be an inertial frame of reference it should be non-accelerating.
Look deep into nature, and then you will understand everything better. Albert Einstein

wanigara

  • Victorian
  • Trailblazer
  • *
  • Posts: 49
  • Respect: +3
Re: Physics: Discussion, Questions & Potential Solutions
« Reply #163 on: November 15, 2018, 11:12:21 pm »
+2
(Q15) Spaceship measures proper time (to) while the stationary scientist measures dilated time (t). So Gamma = 8.
Ek = moc^2(gamma-1) = 10000*(3x10^8)^2 (8-1) = 6.3x10^21 J
Look deep into nature, and then you will understand everything better. Albert Einstein

wanigara

  • Victorian
  • Trailblazer
  • *
  • Posts: 49
  • Respect: +3
Re: Physics: Discussion, Questions & Potential Solutions
« Reply #164 on: November 15, 2018, 11:16:15 pm »
+5
(Q16) Scientist measures dilated time (t). Time measured in quasar's frame is the proper time (to).

to = t/gamma = 20/1.41 = 14.184 hrs = 14.2 hrs.
Look deep into nature, and then you will understand everything better. Albert Einstein