The statements are accurate, but they could be more specific. The general content you are expected to learn for the exams through lectures and readings are clearly laid out. I feel the criticisms are more directed at
some of the assessments, and even more specifically, the introductory units (PSY1011/PSY1022).
In saying that, I feel like they've tried to step up the clarity of assessments and increase the level of support tutors give at second/third level units. I remember not even receiving marking rubrics and constantly being fed different expectations for assessments compared to the actual instructions in first year. The units I took in my second year had only maybe one or two assessments that seemed ambiguous and confusing. Everything else was clear and easy to grasp.
Happy to answer any more questions you have. The Psychology units I've finished are in my signature starting with 'PSY' if you have unit specific questions.
