Advice taken.
Do you see any disadvantage in not taking Quantitative Methods?
Basically with your way, I'm just moving all the quantitative requirement of the BCom. into the second year (Probability, Stats)?
So if I fail, or get below 70% in Calculus 2, I am stuffed.
Or could I just do it like this....
For first year, Keep QM-1, so breadth subjects: Calculus 2, PBL,
2nd year, Take QM-2, so breadth subjects: Linear Algebra, Probability, Corporate Law
3rd year, breadth subjects: Statistics, Taxation Law
With this way, is it more safer as I actually satisfy the quantitative requirement through QM 1,2, as well as doing the maths, but not to the highest level?
I put the breadths into the course plan guide so it will look like this:

Enough of this, I'm off to bed. Thanks