Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

October 16, 2025, 04:07:17 pm

Author Topic: English Exam Discussion 2009  (Read 41198 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

methodsboy

  • Guest
Re: English Exam Discussion 2009
« Reply #30 on: October 30, 2009, 01:27:33 pm »
OMG the prompt for I & B was dumb:
"To be true to urself in a world that is constantly trying to make u somthing else is the greatest achievement"

spontaneouscombustion

  • Victorian
  • Forum Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 97
Re: English Exam Discussion 2009
« Reply #31 on: October 30, 2009, 01:28:39 pm »
So im guessing we're all in agreement, that persuasive article at the end sucked nut, left right and centre, absolutely dominated part 1 and 2 but the image in the article was so poor...
That was why they were so easy I reckon, you just explained the ambiguity in the image and moved on.


I mentioned the circuitry being shown as inside the head thus presenting the role of technology in human life as a positive, something that could enhance our potential etc.  Also the rays of light coming out of it could be said to suggest that technology is a 'ray of light' to civilisation.
Same here, derivativex.
Scientists tell us that the fastest animal on earth, with a top speed of 120ft/sec, is a cow that has been dropped out of a helicopter. –Dave Barry

2008: Music Performance Solo 44
2009: English 50, Biology 45, Literature 42, Revs 40, Further 38 (ahahahahaha stupid score xD)
ENTER - 99.05
2010: Bachelor of Arts Law @ Monash

methodsboy

  • Guest
Re: English Exam Discussion 2009
« Reply #32 on: October 30, 2009, 01:30:29 pm »
i related the 101010101's (from the micro chip) to the reference to the 'homo superhabilis" which indicated a more intelligent human

costargh

  • Victorian
  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 170
Re: English Exam Discussion 2009
« Reply #33 on: October 30, 2009, 01:31:03 pm »
What were the two AMFAS questions? I'm quite interested lol



More says: "I do none harm, I say none harm". Mores decision to place his principles above his family is difficult for a modern audience to understand. Do you agree?

or

The steward says "The great thing's not to get out of your depth..."
To what extent are the characters in the play out of their depth?

btw could someone share with me how they answered the second? I was quick to reject that prompt because i didn't really understand what it was asking.

Thank-you. Prompt (i) to me sounds the better choice, probably because a lot of study would have been more focused on 'principles' rather than the broad 'out of their depth'.

Best of luck to everyone.

What was the Identity and belonging prompt?

methodsboy

  • Guest
Re: English Exam Discussion 2009
« Reply #34 on: October 30, 2009, 01:32:51 pm »
^^ scroll up

costargh

  • Victorian
  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 170
Re: English Exam Discussion 2009
« Reply #35 on: October 30, 2009, 01:35:24 pm »
OMG the prompt for I & B was dumb:
"To be true to urself in a world that is constantly trying to make u somthing else is the greatest achievement"

I like it a lot! Can definitely relate it to social issues!

Parallels with Witness I can think of:

- John Book did not go down the road of corruption in the police force.
- John Book doesnt get married even though his sister wants him to be.
- Amish people don't let 21st century change them.
- The mother of Eli Lapp (name?) doesn't let her infatuation with John Book change her devotion to the Amish people and way of life.


dekoyl

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Superstar
  • ******
  • Posts: 2152
Re: English Exam Discussion 2009
« Reply #36 on: October 30, 2009, 01:38:11 pm »
Twas okay. I didn't get mental block.

I think I wrote homosupersaiyen instead of homosupersomething for the language analysis though.

xXNovaxX

  • Guest
Re: English Exam Discussion 2009
« Reply #37 on: October 30, 2009, 01:39:06 pm »
Would I lose marks for not talking about the BACKGROUND ISSUE in my language analysis....and why do we have 2 threads on the exam =S

so glad that its over, don't believe text response was similar to what I did at home YAY


xXNovaxX

  • Guest
Re: English Exam Discussion 2009
« Reply #38 on: October 30, 2009, 01:39:29 pm »
Twas okay. I didn't get mental block.

I think I wrote homosupersaiyen instead of homosupersomething for the language analysis though.
LOL, I read it as super sayan as well, LMAO, too much anime night before= not good

faraout

  • Victorian
  • Adventurer
  • *
  • Posts: 7
Re: English Exam Discussion 2009
« Reply #39 on: October 30, 2009, 01:41:43 pm »
my context was on identity and belonging,
basically the notion of 'to thine self be true' inspired by Shakespeare(omg i didnt know it was him then), where the texts my school uses are witness and sometimes gladness poems(they are so boring)
My biggest flaw is that i spent too long on context and text response, and lang ana was on the Key In? or did anyone else have that as well? I find it vague and less opinion oriented. overall i did okay, did not expect much however.
« Last Edit: October 30, 2009, 01:55:02 pm by faraout »
[it is rather simpler to find out what is within us than trying to understand the world outside]

skinny

  • Victorian
  • Trailblazer
  • *
  • Posts: 44
Re: English Exam Discussion 2009
« Reply #40 on: October 30, 2009, 01:45:01 pm »
i got the lang/an over with first. i thought it was a bit hard, was pushed for time so i kinda rushed it in the end :S but still, i got through it. text response was romulus, thought they were reasonable topics, thought topics for amfas were reaaally good but i didnt study that... lol. and context prompt for i and b i thought was great, so i feel i did ok with that :)
overall though, i really dont know how i went.
2009 - english, english lit, history revs (french and russian), further maths, psych

faraout

  • Victorian
  • Adventurer
  • *
  • Posts: 7
Re: English Exam Discussion 2009
« Reply #41 on: October 30, 2009, 01:47:39 pm »
oh by the way i did ESL, but it was still hard as, for me at least T_T
[it is rather simpler to find out what is within us than trying to understand the world outside]

Ilovemathsmeth

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1370
Re: English Exam Discussion 2009
« Reply #42 on: October 30, 2009, 01:53:11 pm »
Thrilled! Now I can burn Hard Times! Here I come! =)
Raw Scores:
Psychology 50 | Mathematical Methods 49 | Further Mathematics 49 | Accounting 49 | Chemistry 44 | English 43
ATAR: 99.75

methodsboy

  • Guest
Re: English Exam Discussion 2009
« Reply #43 on: October 30, 2009, 01:53:47 pm »
OMG the prompt for I & B was dumb:
"To be true to urself in a world that is constantly trying to make u somthing else is the greatest achievement"

I like it a lot! Can definitely relate it to social issues!

Parallels with Witness I can think of:

- John Book did not go down the road of corruption in the police force.
- John Book doesnt get married even though his sister wants him to be.
- Amish people don't let 21st century change them.
- The mother of Eli Lapp (name?) doesn't let her infatuation with John Book change her devotion to the Amish people and way of life.


i guess but it was just too long..i expected a much shorter and concise prompt.
i related it to witness:
- John Book successfully realized that his policeman identity suited him the most
- How Muslim women continue to wear the 'hijab' in the western world
- Rachael Lapp's knowledge of her identity prevented her from entering Book's, less familiar, world.

IntoTheNewWorld

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1800
  • Hello World
Re: English Exam Discussion 2009
« Reply #44 on: October 30, 2009, 01:57:01 pm »
I've never written such a shit language analysis, and I think I forgot to mention the author and publication which was quite stupid.

...*plays with ENTER calc*