Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

November 01, 2026, 03:25:58 pm

Author Topic: How did you all go on exam 1?  (Read 23160 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

calindeberg

  • Victorian
  • Adventurer
  • *
  • Posts: 7
Re: How did you all go on exam 1?
« Reply #45 on: November 02, 2009, 04:03:32 pm »
networks
8 = E
9 = B

8 has to be B

B is "all even degrees" and it's possible to get that if you have an edge between the two odd vertices. making all even degrees.

I still stick with E - You can't get four even degree and one of odd degree.

Remember you're looking for the answer that is NOT possible

tim2541

  • Victorian
  • Forum Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 78
Re: How did you all go on exam 1?
« Reply #46 on: November 02, 2009, 04:13:15 pm »
Haha question 9 for trig i guessed C. All up i think i got 35-34

Saraime2003

  • Victorian
  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 115
Re: How did you all go on exam 1?
« Reply #47 on: November 02, 2009, 04:15:11 pm »
I got all those core ones the same as posted.

the rest i got were:

Module 3: BCABEDCCD

Module 4: BDBEDDBAC

Module 5: CBBADECEB.

I'm confident with all those answers but please tell me if you think different

According to those i only got 28/40 (70%). Dam. I suck anyways. But atleast its higher than the last practice exam i did, i only got 65% lol.

BTW, sucky, dont stress, i had about 97/100 for SACs.... I got WAY less. lol. Its so hard to remember all the things from ages ago though. I mean sacs should be higher because you do sacs right after learning the things. ugh :(.

kaz890

  • Victorian
  • Fresh Poster
  • *
  • Posts: 1
Re: How did you all go on exam 1?
« Reply #48 on: November 02, 2009, 04:17:13 pm »
What is the A cut off mark?


Ilovemathsmeth

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1370
Re: How did you all go on exam 1?
« Reply #49 on: November 02, 2009, 04:19:11 pm »
If I think I have got 100% for this exam, with rank 1 for SACs in a strong cohort, how many marks can I afford to lose on exam 2 to get 50?

I really think I'll lose a couple of marks on exam 2 because from what I've seen, I don't get a lot of time to check my answers :( My English is screwed up, I need a 50 in Further for a good ENTER.
Raw Scores:
Psychology 50 | Mathematical Methods 49 | Further Mathematics 49 | Accounting 49 | Chemistry 44 | English 43
ATAR: 99.75

okeydoke7

  • Victorian
  • Fresh Poster
  • *
  • Posts: 3
Re: How did you all go on exam 1?
« Reply #50 on: November 02, 2009, 04:21:09 pm »
networks
8 = E
9 = B

8 has to be B

B is "all even degrees" and it's possible to get that if you have an edge between the two odd vertices. making all even degrees.

I still stick with E - You can't get four even degree and one of odd degree.

Remember you're looking for the answer that is NOT possible
B is all of "Even" degree. I ended up choosing B over E. A was "Equal" degree which obviously suits your explanation there.

calindeberg

  • Victorian
  • Adventurer
  • *
  • Posts: 7
Re: How did you all go on exam 1?
« Reply #51 on: November 02, 2009, 04:27:11 pm »
networks
8 = E
9 = B

8 has to be B

B is "all even degrees" and it's possible to get that if you have an edge between the two odd vertices. making all even degrees.

I still stick with E - You can't get four even degree and one of odd degree.

Remember you're looking for the answer that is NOT possible
B is all of "Even" degree. I ended up choosing B over E. A was "Equal" degree which obviously suits your explanation there.

yeah, my bad.

I'm pretty sure you can't get four even and one odd. I drew up several diagrams.

Is there anyone else you thinks it's E?

kazoospasm

  • Victorian
  • Trailblazer
  • *
  • Posts: 46
Re: How did you all go on exam 1?
« Reply #52 on: November 02, 2009, 04:28:20 pm »
If I think I have got 100% for this exam, with rank 1 for SACs in a strong cohort, how many marks can I afford to lose on exam 2 to get 50?
The only person I know with a 50 had 40/40 & 59/60.
2009: Psychology; Further
2010: English Language; Biology; Chemistry; Methods

sucky

  • Victorian
  • Trailblazer
  • *
  • Posts: 33
Re: How did you all go on exam 1?
« Reply #53 on: November 02, 2009, 04:32:18 pm »
Quote
BTW, sucky, dont stress, i had about 97/100 for SACs.... I got WAY less. lol. Its so hard to remember all the things from ages ago though. I mean sacs should be higher because you do sacs right after learning the things. ugh :(.

Yeah. :(

Anyone have any idea what I'd get?

Ilovemathsmeth

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1370
Re: How did you all go on exam 1?
« Reply #54 on: November 02, 2009, 04:34:44 pm »
If I think I have got 100% for this exam, with rank 1 for SACs in a strong cohort, how many marks can I afford to lose on exam 2 to get 50?
The only person I know with a 50 had 40/40 & 59/60.

ahhh crap!! =(
Raw Scores:
Psychology 50 | Mathematical Methods 49 | Further Mathematics 49 | Accounting 49 | Chemistry 44 | English 43
ATAR: 99.75

cjays66

  • Victorian
  • Trailblazer
  • *
  • Posts: 37
Re: How did you all go on exam 1?
« Reply #55 on: November 02, 2009, 04:36:28 pm »
If I think I have got 100% for this exam, with rank 1 for SACs in a strong cohort, how many marks can I afford to lose on exam 2 to get 50?
The only person I know with a 50 had 40/40 & 59/60.

What can i achieve with a 37/40 and 55/60

spontaneouscombustion

  • Victorian
  • Forum Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 97
Re: How did you all go on exam 1?
« Reply #56 on: November 02, 2009, 05:02:39 pm »
question 9 for module 5....I really don't get it.
Scientists tell us that the fastest animal on earth, with a top speed of 120ft/sec, is a cow that has been dropped out of a helicopter. –Dave Barry

2008: Music Performance Solo 44
2009: English 50, Biology 45, Literature 42, Revs 40, Further 38 (ahahahahaha stupid score xD)
ENTER - 99.05
2010: Bachelor of Arts Law @ Monash

hychyr

  • Victorian
  • Adventurer
  • *
  • Posts: 6
Re: How did you all go on exam 1?
« Reply #57 on: November 02, 2009, 05:06:10 pm »
question 9 for module 5....I really don't get it.

i'll try explain.

elephant has a one step dominance of one, and a two-step dominance of 1. which means, the animal elephant beats, beat only one other animal.

we can see that aardvarks has a one step dominance of 1, which means it only beat one animal.

spontaneouscombustion

  • Victorian
  • Forum Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 97
Re: How did you all go on exam 1?
« Reply #58 on: November 02, 2009, 05:13:17 pm »
question 9 for module 5....I really don't get it.

i'll try explain.

elephant has a one step dominance of one, and a two-step dominance of 1. which means, the animal elephant beats, beat only one other animal.

we can see that aardvarks has a one step dominance of 1, which means it only beat one animal.

but why can't it be E?
Scientists tell us that the fastest animal on earth, with a top speed of 120ft/sec, is a cow that has been dropped out of a helicopter. –Dave Barry

2008: Music Performance Solo 44
2009: English 50, Biology 45, Literature 42, Revs 40, Further 38 (ahahahahaha stupid score xD)
ENTER - 99.05
2010: Bachelor of Arts Law @ Monash

hychyr

  • Victorian
  • Adventurer
  • *
  • Posts: 6
Re: How did you all go on exam 1?
« Reply #59 on: November 02, 2009, 05:16:15 pm »
question 9 for module 5....I really don't get it.

i'll try explain.

elephant has a one step dominance of one, and a two-step dominance of 1. which means, the animal elephant beats, beat only one other animal.

we can see that aardvarks has a one step dominance of 1, which means it only beat one animal.

but why can't it be E?

because you can't get a 2-step dominance value of 5 from beating chimps and two others