Argh I screwed up two questions:
I said that the p score of 0.05 meant that the "probability of the results being due to chance were 0.05 (1 in 5 out of 100)." Don't ask me why I included that bit in brackets at the end which will now make my correct answer incorrect. I don't know why I did that.
For the debriefing bit (last question) I said (and I'm truncating this majorly)
1. Information about the true nature of the study, hypothesis etc
2. Any info about deception to clear up any misconceptions and ongoing stress
I'm pretty sure what I wrote in 2 should have been added to 1 and in 2 I should have said participants must be given their results if they request them.
Ah well, I'm fairly sure I didn't get anything else wrong. something compelled me to go over the semantic network theory last night before I went to bed. It was the last thing I studied so I'm very lucky I was able to give enough detail on those first questions. I think a lot of people would be too hazy on the semantic network theory to give enough detail to answer all those questions.
I think I'm heading for a 40. A+ in all the SACs, what I think was a high A+ in the mid year, and what I think is a medium A+ in this exam.