Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

August 30, 2025, 05:15:04 pm

Author Topic: how did everybody go?  (Read 24326 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

mtwtfss

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 495
Re: how did everybody go?
« Reply #75 on: November 05, 2009, 05:34:28 pm »
for total value of stock q 1.2.1 i got $9680

100 x 18
120 x 29
80 x 55

anyone else get that ?
I got 10,530...
100x18
120x29
80x60...
didn't include those darn posters

chuckjefster90

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 201
Re: how did everybody go?
« Reply #76 on: November 05, 2009, 05:35:52 pm »
so is 9680 correct?

nbalakers24

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 672
Re: how did everybody go?
« Reply #77 on: November 05, 2009, 05:42:27 pm »
i put cost of sales in general journal too,

mathsmeth: what question on posters?

nbalakers24

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 672
Re: how did everybody go?
« Reply #78 on: November 05, 2009, 05:45:28 pm »
for total value of stock q 1.2.1 i got $9680

100 x 18
120 x 29
80 x 55

anyone else get that ?


i got that, hope its correct

GoodGuys

  • Guest
Re: how did everybody go?
« Reply #79 on: November 05, 2009, 05:50:36 pm »
went into that exam with doing one trial, which i did with the solutions just before the exam started. Im a gun! LOL

unknown12

  • Victorian
  • Trailblazer
  • *
  • Posts: 35
Re: how did everybody go?
« Reply #80 on: November 05, 2009, 05:53:19 pm »
I think i lost 3 marks on both papers, should get something ok.

andrew4443

  • Victorian
  • Forum Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 66
Re: how did everybody go?
« Reply #81 on: November 05, 2009, 06:09:25 pm »

I know for sure now I've lost 3 marks with the mark for 120 on cost of sales in general journal pending. :(
[/quote]
Take a look at question 2.3.2 in the 2008 examiners report, they had the exact same situation for the cost of sales, and they accepted both methods. So you would get the marks for putting it in the general journal (that was the preferred method for the VCAA as well)

unknown12

  • Victorian
  • Trailblazer
  • *
  • Posts: 35
Re: how did everybody go?
« Reply #82 on: November 05, 2009, 06:39:43 pm »
Its actually more correct to put it in the general journal as it is to do with that part of the sales revenue. So you will not lose a mark for that.

darkphoenix

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1564
Re: how did everybody go?
« Reply #83 on: November 05, 2009, 06:39:58 pm »
for total value of stock q 1.2.1 i got $9680

100 x 18
120 x 29
80 x 55

anyone else get that ?

Yep i got this. But when it said 90 posters were on hand, what was that supposed to mean? I just ignored it.
2009: Accounting
2010: English | Methods (CAS) | Specialist Maths | Chemistry | Chinese SL
2011: Bachelor of Commerce/Engineering @ Monash

nbalakers24

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 672
Re: how did everybody go?
« Reply #84 on: November 05, 2009, 06:43:43 pm »
the only thing that i used the poster for was working out the NRV which is 60 - 5 = 55

Ilovemathsmeth

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1370
Re: how did everybody go?
« Reply #85 on: November 05, 2009, 06:57:14 pm »
yeah you should feel miserable, was an easy exam. you ate too many notes and ended up choking on them

lol i didnt know it was possible to eat notes. do you do that?

hmm...it was okay. i wouldnt be as over confident as you are and say it was easy. in my opinion, an exam is easy only when you get 50. if you get 50 for accounting, ill believe that you did well/honestly felt it was easy, but you were just too arrogant to be nice to other forum members!
Raw Scores:
Psychology 50 | Mathematical Methods 49 | Further Mathematics 49 | Accounting 49 | Chemistry 44 | English 43
ATAR: 99.75

ninwa

  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 8267
Re: how did everybody go?
« Reply #86 on: November 05, 2009, 06:59:18 pm »
Guys please stop feeding the troll, you just encourage them that way.
ExamPro enquiries to [email protected]

sdhains

  • Guest
Re: how did everybody go?
« Reply #87 on: November 05, 2009, 07:48:59 pm »
yeah you should feel miserable, was an easy exam. you ate too many notes and ended up choking on them

lol i didnt know it was possible to eat notes. do you do that?

hmm...it was okay. i wouldnt be as over confident as you are and say it was easy. in my opinion, an exam is easy only when you get 50. if you get 50 for accounting, ill believe that you did well/honestly felt it was easy, but you were just too arrogant to be nice to other forum members!
You actually have to be such a freak to get 50 in accounting

YT_17

  • Victorian
  • Forum Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 75
Re: how did everybody go?
« Reply #88 on: November 05, 2009, 08:47:35 pm »
i wonder if there is solution .........

Ilovemathsmeth

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1370
Re: how did everybody go?
« Reply #89 on: November 05, 2009, 10:14:12 pm »
LOL I know!! How scary would a 50 be for Accounting?? I admire Jamison and rhjc 1991. They must have aced the exams!!
Raw Scores:
Psychology 50 | Mathematical Methods 49 | Further Mathematics 49 | Accounting 49 | Chemistry 44 | English 43
ATAR: 99.75