Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

November 05, 2025, 06:37:22 pm

Author Topic: Exam 1 - How did you all go?  (Read 18357 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

hard

  • Guest
Exam 1 - How did you all go?
« on: November 06, 2009, 10:41:10 am »
Admin edit: This seemed to be the most populous thread, so I'm making it the proper disc. thread.
« Last Edit: November 06, 2009, 12:00:40 pm by admin »

KeyMan

  • Victorian
  • Forum Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 58
Re: SUGGESTED SOLUTIONS
« Reply #1 on: November 06, 2009, 10:45:23 am »
Q1)
a) log_e(x) + 1
b) 1/(2pi^2 + 4pi + 2)

Q2)
a)-1/2log_e|1-2x| + c
b) 23/3

Q3)
3/(x+4)

Q4)
pi/6, 2pi/3

Q5)
a) 1/12
b) 1/3
c) 1/4

Q6) 1/12pi mm/min

Q7)
a) 2/3
b) 1.2

Q8)
k = e^a(a-1)

Q9)
x = 3/2

Q10)
401/200

These are my answers. Sorry about the formatting, don't know how to use latex ><
« Last Edit: November 06, 2009, 10:46:55 am by KeyMan »

avram_grant

  • Victorian
  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 128
Re: SUGGESTED SOLUTIONS
« Reply #2 on: November 06, 2009, 10:47:23 am »
yep, got the same answers as you

sdhains

  • Guest
Re: SUGGESTED SOLUTIONS
« Reply #3 on: November 06, 2009, 10:48:21 am »
Q1)
a) log_e(x) + 1
b) 1/(2pi^2 + 4pi + 2)

Q2)
a)-1/2log_e|1-2x| + c
b) 23/3

Q3)
3/(x+4)

Q4)
pi/6, 2pi/3

Q5)
a) 1/12
b) 1/3
c) 1/4

Q6) 1/12pi mm/min

Q7)
a) 2/3
b) 1.2

Q8)
k = e^a(a-1)

Q9)
x = 3/2

Q10)
401/200

These are my answers. Sorry about the formatting, don't know how to use latex ><

I think 9 was x=3/2, -1. -1 was defined. (I Only had 3/2 but someone was saying that -1 was defined)
and 10 i got something different i think. But other than that looks good.

unknown12

  • Victorian
  • Trailblazer
  • *
  • Posts: 35
Re: SUGGESTED SOLUTIONS
« Reply #4 on: November 06, 2009, 10:48:43 am »
Yep can confrim them and 10 b) you had to state that;

As the value of the gradient was positive at the point x (8), the tangent is always above the graph and therefore using the linear approximation method which takes the value of the tangent the approximate value will always have a larger y value.

avram_grant

  • Victorian
  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 128
Re: SUGGESTED SOLUTIONS
« Reply #5 on: November 06, 2009, 10:49:38 am »
you couldnt have -1, since loge(-1) isnt defined

sdhains

  • Guest
Re: SUGGESTED SOLUTIONS
« Reply #6 on: November 06, 2009, 10:50:19 am »
you couldnt have -1, since loge(-1) isnt defined
awesome :).
If I got 37/40 is it still possible to get 40 raw with A/A+ SACS?
« Last Edit: November 06, 2009, 10:52:52 am by sam5 »

THem

  • Guest
Re: SUGGESTED SOLUTIONS
« Reply #7 on: November 06, 2009, 10:50:53 am »
What was question 3 again? Short term memory ;|
nvm it was find the inverse
« Last Edit: November 06, 2009, 10:53:05 am by THem »

hard

  • Guest
Re: SUGGESTED SOLUTIONS
« Reply #8 on: November 06, 2009, 10:51:02 am »
isn't q 5: 1/16 since 1/4 * 1/4 = 1/16 :S

KeyMan

  • Victorian
  • Forum Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 58
Re: SUGGESTED SOLUTIONS
« Reply #9 on: November 06, 2009, 10:51:51 am »
No, the ball wasn't replaced so it was 1/4 * 1/3

hard

  • Guest
Re: SUGGESTED SOLUTIONS
« Reply #10 on: November 06, 2009, 10:52:12 am »
FMLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL

Murph#3

  • Victorian
  • Adventurer
  • *
  • Posts: 7
Re: SUGGESTED SOLUTIONS
« Reply #11 on: November 06, 2009, 10:53:03 am »
What was question 2b again?

saymun

  • Victorian
  • Adventurer
  • *
  • Posts: 9
Re: SUGGESTED SOLUTIONS
« Reply #12 on: November 06, 2009, 10:53:48 am »

Q2)
a)-1/2log_e|1-2x| + c
b) 23/3


for Q2a, it said find AN anti-derivative...doesnt that mean yyou dont need C?

KeyMan

  • Victorian
  • Forum Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 58
Re: SUGGESTED SOLUTIONS
« Reply #13 on: November 06, 2009, 10:54:32 am »
Evaluate the integral from 0 to 4 i think... forgot ><

avram_grant

  • Victorian
  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 128
Re: SUGGESTED SOLUTIONS
« Reply #14 on: November 06, 2009, 10:54:49 am »
yeh you dont need c