Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

June 04, 2026, 11:10:43 pm

Author Topic: Vectors  (Read 2116 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

kenhung123

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 3373
  • Respect: +7
Vectors
« on: November 11, 2009, 12:38:26 am »
0
Resolve forces
« Last Edit: November 11, 2009, 08:47:56 pm by kenhung123 »

dekoyl

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Superstar
  • ******
  • Posts: 2152
  • Respect: +18
Re: Graphing Ellipses?
« Reply #1 on: November 11, 2009, 12:40:51 am »
0
You can re-arrange it in terms of Y and graph it on the calculator. You'll have a

kenhung123

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 3373
  • Respect: +7
Re: Graphing Ellipses?
« Reply #2 on: November 11, 2009, 12:42:08 am »
0
But when I do that with calculator, it will have some gap because you graph 2 functions?

kenhung123

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 3373
  • Respect: +7
Re: Graphing Ellipses?
« Reply #3 on: November 11, 2009, 12:50:16 am »
0
Thanks!

TrueTears

  • TT
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 16363
  • Respect: +667
Re: Graphing Ellipses?
« Reply #4 on: November 11, 2009, 12:50:33 am »
0
Pretend there is no "gap". The calc is stupid.



A better way is to use parametric equations.

Let and

Thus the equation of the ellipse

In parametric form will be and

Change your calc into Parametric form

y1 type in y

x1 type in x

Graph.
« Last Edit: November 11, 2009, 12:52:36 am by TrueTears »
PhD @ MIT (Economics).

Interested in asset pricing, econometrics, and social choice theory.

kenhung123

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 3373
  • Respect: +7
Re: Graphing Ellipses?
« Reply #5 on: November 11, 2009, 12:51:39 am »
0
Btw, isn't it /2 both sides=16 and 32 nots 4 and 8?

TrueTears

  • TT
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 16363
  • Respect: +667
Re: Graphing Ellipses?
« Reply #6 on: November 11, 2009, 12:53:10 am »
0
Btw, isn't it /2 both sides=16 and 32 nots 4 and 8?
Sorry I just edited before you posted haha

braindead after too much physics >.>
PhD @ MIT (Economics).

Interested in asset pricing, econometrics, and social choice theory.

kenhung123

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 3373
  • Respect: +7
Re: Graphing Ellipses?
« Reply #7 on: November 11, 2009, 12:54:14 am »
0
Thanks True for your help

kenhung123

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 3373
  • Respect: +7
Re: Kinematics
« Reply #8 on: November 11, 2009, 01:00:46 am »
0
New question posted..

GerrySly

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 790
  • Respect: +5
Re: Kinematics
« Reply #9 on: November 11, 2009, 01:15:37 am »
0
Dude, leave the first post as your original question then post a new question...

This thread confused me.
VCE 2009
English, Methods, Specialist, IT: Software Development, Religion & Society, French

THem

  • Guest
Re: Kinematics
« Reply #10 on: November 11, 2009, 01:28:55 am »
0
A train accelerating uniformly, attains a speed of 20m/sec from rest in 2 mins. It maintains this speed for 5 mins and is then uniformly retarded to rest in 1 min.

Find the retardation of the train (-20ms-2?)

Find the total distance travelled in 8mins (130m?)

Sketch a velocity time graph of train motion

Based on the question you're wrong, unless you mean seconds. ( 2 seconds, 5 seconds, 1 second, 8 seconds)

kenhung123

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 3373
  • Respect: +7
Re: Kinematics
« Reply #11 on: November 11, 2009, 10:35:13 am »
0
Thanks

THem

  • Guest
Re: Kinematics
« Reply #12 on: November 11, 2009, 10:41:39 am »
0
x = 56.5
A = -9.8ms^-2
u = ?
v = 0 ( speed is 0 at it's maximum height)
v^2 = u^2+ 2ax
u^2 = 2(9.8)(56.5)
u =33.28


kenhung123

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 3373
  • Respect: +7
Re: Kinematics
« Reply #13 on: November 11, 2009, 10:43:18 am »
0
Thanks but how did you know your not meant to anti differentiate accel?

THem

  • Guest
Re: Kinematics
« Reply #14 on: November 11, 2009, 10:46:20 am »
0
you don't really anti-differentiate something unless they tell you the situation
is defined by some equation or some vector.

a = -9.8j ( a = dv/dt)
v = -9.8tj + c

You can't really go any further because you don't know the velocity
at any point in time

Sorry I don't really have a better explanation and I have to go to Physics now ;d, good luck with it.